In his message, Pahlavi condemned the violence, cowardice, and destructiveness of Ayatollah Khamenei and co., and confidently predicted that the collapse of the regime there is irreversible. “We are prepared for the first hundred days after the fall, for the transitional period, and for the establishment of a national and democratic government — by the Iranian people and for the Iranian people,” he vowed. Pahlavi is an advocate for a Westernized, secularized government in Iran.
The return of Pahlavi could benefit Jews as well, and not only because the current dictatorial and collapsing regime is dedicated to wiping out Israel. A popular X account called “The Persian Jewess” reminisced about the days of the monarchy, “Since the rise of Islam in Iran, Iranian Jews were oppressed, shoved in ghettos, raped, tortured, murdered forced to convert, and treated like second-class citizens. Then in 1925 the Pahlavis came to power and instituted reforms that recognized Iranian Jews as equal citizens for the first time in millennia. For 54 glorious years, we flourished.”
She added, “When Khomeini came to power, we were forced to flee, our hearts mourning all that Iran once was and could have been under the Pahlavis. And in the 46 years since, we have not forgotten the family who broke us free from our chains, and ended our oppression.”
![]()
Iranians Chant for Shah’s Return As Terrorist Regime Collapses
In Tehran, Iranians are reportedly chanting enthusiastically about the anticipated fall of the “Islapjmedia.com
A discussion on this started on r/AngryCops last night.Senior Defense Planner Fired for Slamming Israel As a 'Death Cult' but More Questions Remain
A senior Army officer has been dismissed from his position inside the Joint Chiefs of Staff office tasked with developing policy and strategy for the Middle East over inflammatory comments he made about Israel and its relationship with the U.S. on social media. Colonel Nathan McCormack, an Army infantry officer who served as a branch chief of the office focusing on Egypt, Syria, Jordan, Lebanon, and Israel in the Joint Staff's Strategy, Plans and Policy Directorate (J5), was removed from a job he's held since June 2024, after media pointed out he'd referred to Israel as a "death cult" and railed against “Netanyahu and his Judeo-supremacist cronies.”
[clip]
During Desert Storm, I worked in the War Plans cell in the Army Operations Center. It wasn't my usual gig, but the call went out early for volunteers to work 12- to 18-hour shifts in the Pentagon sub-basement, and having come from an infantry division, I jumped at the chance to do something that approached real soldiering. My colleagues in the group were mostly senior colonels who weren't going any further. They had all been military attachés to various countries in the Middle East. The first thing that struck me was that they were vehemently pro-Arab and, when the subject came up, anti-Israel. They fervently believed, I think right up until the night of January 16, 1991, that there would be an "Arab solution" that allowed Saddam Hussein to save face and the Arab world to avoid war. I tried to push a bit to understand this romance for the Arab world and antipathy toward Israel, and my best guess is that it came down to hospitality. Colonels stationed in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia and the Gulf States hung out with royalty. They went hunting with falcons. They were treated as though they were royalty, and all of those officers considered various Arabian gentry to be close friends. The relationship with the Israeli military was much more prickly. The Israelis weren't terribly soft and cuddly; they didn't care about your feelings, and the relationships were strictly transactional of the "what can you do for me right now" type. Again, this isn't data, but perception built over several weeks of close contact. My thesis is that much of America's Middle East policy is not driven by AIPAC or a Jewish conspiracy, but I believe it is heavily colored by State and Defense Department officials who love the Arabs and loathe the Israelis. This is why the nonsensical "two-state solution" keeps coming back to life, and the Biden White House did everything it could to scuttle the Abraham Accords.
The practical question is more basic. In what universe did Colonel McCormack think it was okay to denigrate a key U.S. regional ally on social media in an account that was easily matched to his name when his job was leading U.S. Defense strategy and policy for the area occupied by that ally? To me, that demonstrates that a) McCormack's views were well within acceptable parameters within the Joint Staff Plans, Policy, and Strategy office. It is impossible to believe that McCormack's subordinates were not guided by their boss's views. It is equally impossible not to believe that McCormack's superiors either held the same views or tolerated McCormack's. Either way, the Secretary of Defense was not getting unbiased advice and that puts the nation at risk., The lack of discipline apparent in announcing official travel on X and talking smack about a U.S. Senator supporting your boss (several levels up) and sitting on the Senate Armed Services Committee is breathtaking.
This is the kind of cultural rot that Pete Hegseth has to contend with. The bad part is that it took a media leak to bring the matter under control, and it is nearly guaranteed that McCormack is the tiny, least intelligent tip of the iceberg.
One option kicked around last night on FNC was the IDF inserting a commando team at Fordow to destroy the facility. Casualties would likely be high unless there was complete collapse of Iran's military.U.S. Should Destroy Fordow — but Only If Israel Can’t
In under a week, Israel has achieved complete air supremacy, allowing its pilots to hit targets in Iran without fear of harassment. Though the conflict has taken a toll (Iran’s indiscriminate ballistic missile attacks have killed dozens of Israelis and injured hundreds more), the Iranian counterstrikes have not destroyed any significant strategic targets. Israel, meanwhile, has degraded Iran’s ballistic missile production, its stockpiles of missiles, and its rocket launchers; it has damaged or destroyed its airbases and planes; it has struck Iran’s major oil refineries; and it has taken out dozens of top Iranian military leaders. Israel’s opening strike against Iran killed the man who was effectively the chief of staff of the Iranian military, Major General Ali Shadmani; on Monday, they killed his replacement, Major General Gholam Ali Rashid.
In terms of the top goal of the war effort, Israelis have done significant damage to Natanz, Iran’s main nuclear facility, as well as damaging several other nuclear sites and laboratories and killing many of its top nuclear scientists. But looming out there is Fordow, the deeply fortified nuclear-enrichment facility built into the side of a mountain. If Fordow is not destroyed, or at least rendered inoperable by destruction of the infrastructure necessary to operate it, Iran could move whatever stockpiles of uranium it still has and race to enrich it at the facility — an unacceptable conclusion to the current conflict. It’s possible that Israel has some creative way of destroying the facility or damaging it to a degree that puts it out of commission for the short term. The Hezbollah pager operation illustrated its ingenuity. But the most straightforward way to take out the facility is with bunker-buster bombs — of the 30,000 pound Massive Ordnance Penetrator (MOP) variety that are possessed only by the U.S. and can be delivered only by American bombers such as the B-2.
One option kicked around last night on FNC was the IDF inserting a commando team at Fordow to destroy the facility. Casualties would likely be high unless there was complete collapse of Iran's military.