MVA With A Motorcycle - California

Yeah, and while everyone is at wreck A, what of wreck B and C?

I fail to see why it is uncomfortable to say, yeah, 30 people at a down bike might not necessarily be the best practice. I mean, all I am getting is that that was the LEAST that should have happened.

:shrug:

And thereby comes the "no medics available", if they are on the way or not reporting available. Bound to happen though.

This isn't black and white; either too many OR too few. Better to have the right number than too few and better to have the right number than too many. There is such a thing as too many, yes? Can we just agree on that? Too few people can always do more, especially a good crew, people used to working together. Too many, people get in one anothers way.

I guess it's the difference between private and public sector. Too many is not a virtue in small business. Neither is too few but, come on, that is a FAR cry from too few. There is over 20 people in the one shot, most just watching and that is what caught my eye.

Yeah, but if one fire fighter is busy, none of them can leave. I saw where one guy was cleaning up. The rest just idle I imagine.
 

rmorse

Well-Known Member
For all those people who are saying they would rather have too many:

I hit a deer on my dirt bike and had to be chopper lifted out. It was like a field day for the paramedics. One person involved, no cars, one person injured. We had about 20+ people on the scene (private road, too). Now, I'm good with it being a slow day and all, and they wanted to come to a crash. Seriously, I'm good with that and I 100% understand it. But, all of the extra people made for chaos. I was conscious until I arrived at the hospital and I was observing what was going on. I was kicked, stepped on, bumped into, etc. many times. All by accident, but all becuase there was simply waaaaaay too many people there.

That being said, after going through this, I am extremely grateful of the people who cared for me. There definitely was an element of reassurance that there would be SOMEONE there who knew what to do. If it happened again, I would want the same people there taking care of me. They did great!
 

MMDad

Lem Putt
There's 20 people IN the one pic either geared up or obviously wearing their affiliation sweatshirts. That means, what, at least four more, two up and two down stream directing traffic. Some folks in vehicles checking gear, comms, what have you. With your math skills, you should work for OMB.

In one pic I see 8 EMS and 4 FD, one guy in a t-shirt (witness or the guy he hit?), one onlooker, and two people who may possibly be volunteers standing by. Every one of the EMS are working. One FD is cleaning up while three are waiting to help if needed.

In the other pic that has a lot of people there are 8 EMS, 4 FD, one cop, t-shirt guy, two sweatshirt guys, and two onlookers. Two of the FD are putting away the fire hose, one is cleaning up, and one is in command. The EMS are all involved.

Anyone who has ever driven past a crash in SMC knows that nobody is ever directing traffic. There are two people using radios in the pic, so there would be no reason to have anyone else doing comms. There's no evidence that there are more than 12 responders on scene plus maybe two or three off duty "helpers."

So tell me, Larry, how many people should they send to a motorcycle vs. SUV crash on a road with a 50 MPH speed limit?
 

MMDad

Lem Putt
For all those people who are saying they would rather have too many:

I hit a deer on my dirt bike and had to be chopper lifted out. It was like a field day for the paramedics. One person involved, no cars, one person injured. We had about 20+ people on the scene (private road, too). Now, I'm good with it being a slow day and all, and they wanted to come to a crash. Seriously, I'm good with that and I 100% understand it. But, all of the extra people made for chaos. I was conscious until I arrived at the hospital and I was observing what was going on. I was kicked, stepped on, bumped into, etc. many times. All by accident, but all becuase there was simply waaaaaay too many people there.

That being said, after going through this, I am extremely grateful of the people who cared for me. There definitely was an element of reassurance that there would be SOMEONE there who knew what to do. If it happened again, I would want the same people there taking care of me. They did great!
That's a command issue, not a too many people issue. The person with command on scene should have assigned the personnel to avoid exactly what you describe.
 

bohman

Well-Known Member
This isn't black and white; either too many OR too few. Better to have the right number than too few and better to have the right number than too many. There is such a thing as too many, yes? Can we just agree on that? Too few people can always do more, especially a good crew, people used to working together. Too many, people get in one anothers way.

I guess it's the difference between private and public sector. Too many is not a virtue in small business. Neither is too few but, come on, that is a FAR cry from too few. There is over 20 people in the one shot, most just watching and that is what caught my eye.

Larry, I was with you at first. It does seem like a lot of people, even if we use the lower number that other people counted. And I agree that there is often un-necessary outrage on this forum if you ask questions about fire/EMS/cops. And that's just for the honest questions, not even actual criticism.

On the other hand, you've been presented with a number of reasonable scenarios that explain the large response, yet you are choosing to go down in flames rather than bail out. Almost any activity is more complicated than it looks. Why do you bother hiring employees? All you're doing is just putting seeds in dirt and watering them, right? You should be able to handle that yourself. Hell, you've even got the fancy machine that does the potting for you. Sounds like you've hired too many people. :duel:
 

Larry Gude

Strung Out
Larry, I was with you at first. It does seem like a lot of people, even if we use the lower number that other people counted. And I agree that there is often un-necessary outrage on this forum if you ask questions about fire/EMS/cops. And that's just for the honest questions, not even actual criticism.

On the other hand, you've been presented with a number of reasonable scenarios that explain the large response, yet you are choosing to go down in flames rather than bail out. Almost any activity is more complicated than it looks. Why do you bother hiring employees? All you're doing is just putting seeds in dirt and watering them, right? You should be able to handle that yourself. Hell, you've even got the fancy machine that does the potting for you. Sounds like you've hired too many people. :duel:

First off, it's soil. Not dirt. Second, it's interesting you would make your first comment, about how you can't say a word about EMS and how silly that is and then you step right in their with them and, lastly, there's been no 'reasonable' scenario; only 'reasons' why 20-30 people is appropriate to this incident. Are you seriously suggesting EMS and small business are analogous? Seriously?

Fine. It HAS to be the proper number because they wouldn't all be there if it were not the correct number.

:yay:
 

Larry Gude

Strung Out
So tell me, Larry, how many people should they send to a motorcycle vs. SUV crash on a road with a 50 MPH speed limit?

The correct number, is, obviously, however many were there. If it's too many, not that that is possible, or they are getting in one anothers way which, again, can't happen, it's all a 'command' issue.

So, A, the correct answer is 'however many are there'.

:buddies:
 

SoMDGirl42

Well-Known Member
And you don't see the glaring inconsistency in what you are saying?

No glaring inconsistencies.

We'll disbatch 1 or 2 to your accident and you can wait 20 minutes IF they require additional personnel

Disbatch 30 to me or my family as the inital disbatch. I'll say thank you and return them to service if they aren't required.
 

ICit

Jam out with ur clam out
No glaring inconsistencies.

We'll disbatch 1 or 2 to your accident and you can wait 20 minutes IF they require additional personnel

Disbatch 30 to me or my family as the inital disbatch. I'll say thank you and return them to service if they aren't required.

:yay:
... and just to think... they give their spare time up for this.


well how many firefighters should we send to his burning house?
 

Larry Gude

Strung Out
No glaring inconsistencies.

We'll disbatch 1 or 2 to your accident and you can wait 20 minutes IF they require additional personnel

Disbatch 30 to me or my family as the inital disbatch. I'll say thank you and return them to service if they aren't required.

I'll spell it out; if 30 are at your motorcycle accident, it's going to be tough to get many to your family.


I find it illustrative that this has struck such a raw nerve.
 

bohman

Well-Known Member
First off, it's soil. Not dirt. Second, it's interesting you would make your first comment, about how you can't say a word about EMS and how silly that is and then you step right in their with them and, lastly, there's been no 'reasonable' scenario; only 'reasons' why 20-30 people is appropriate to this incident. Are you seriously suggesting EMS and small business are analogous? Seriously?

Fine. It HAS to be the proper number because they wouldn't all be there if it were not the correct number.

:yay:

I didn't "step right in" with anybody. I think that it's a good thing to question public servants, and even criticize if necessary. I did not bash you for asking the initial question - I agreed with you that it seemed like a large response. But I do think that you are lumping the "OMG!!!! EMS hater!!" knee-jerk responses in with those who provided you with (IMO, reasonable) examples of why there might be so many people/equipment showing up for a MC accident. Some people seemed to think you're just bashing EMS; others just tried to give you some first-hand info.

As for EMS vs. small business, I was just making the point that sometimes there are things going on behind the scenes that a casual observer won't be aware of. I'm quite certain your business involves more than soil & water, but I wouldn't know what they are unless you told me. (No, that was not a request :biggrin:)
 

Larry Gude

Strung Out
I didn't "step right in" with anybody. I think that it's a good thing to question public servants, and even criticize if necessary. I did not bash you for asking the initial question - I agreed with you that it seemed like a large response. But I do think that you are lumping the "OMG!!!! EMS hater!!" knee-jerk responses in with those who provided you with (IMO, reasonable) examples of why there might be so many people/equipment showing up for a MC accident. Some people seemed to think you're just bashing EMS; others just tried to give you some first-hand info.

As for EMS vs. small business, I was just making the point that sometimes there are things going on behind the scenes that a casual observer won't be aware of. I'm quite certain your business involves more than soil & water, but I wouldn't know what they are unless you told me. (No, that was not a request :biggrin:)


Wait. So, is it possible to have too many EMS people on a scene? Is that what we're saying? :jerry:

The ONLY reason this got started was because my initial reaction at seeing over 20 some odd people IN ONE picture was 'Wow. That makes no sense to me." and all I got was everything BUT interest that maybe, just maybe, some improvements are needed. I got reasons WHY there were so many. I got reasons that the number was just right. I got reasons it may well have not been enough. I got real world reasons that too many is bed (victim getting stepped on) is a command, not numbers, problem.

I got nothing discussing a more efficient use and allocation of resources.

You mention my business and this is why I reacted the way I did; every single day we look at how many people we have, what do we need, how to balance needs, the unpredictable nature of the thing, equipment, rent, buy, part time, full time, no one knows more than a small business person how challenging this is.

A leader in our industry promoted some time back the concept of fact based conversations so as to avoid the kind of useless, pithy comments that sometimes get in the way of things working better.

If, in fact, 20-30 people is proper allocation and use of resources, so be it. To me, it struck me as absurd.

And, once again, thank you to everyone who does EMS work. Desire for efficiency and good allocation of resources is not opposition to you. It is, frankly, support for you.

:buddies:
 

SoMDGirl42

Well-Known Member
I'll spell it out; if 30 are at your motorcycle accident, it's going to be tough to get many to your family.


I find it illustrative that this has struck such a raw nerve.

I don't think that at all. This area has a wonderful EMS system. Have you ever once heard of an emergency in this tri-county area where there wasn't enough man power? We aren't talking World Trade Center Disaster, they didn't even have enough man power for that. We are talking typical house fire, building fire, accident incident. If we don't have enough man power in the tri-county area, they'll call out the next county. Many times our county volunteers fill in for other paid counties. :razz:

You are a real pain in the azz, you know that? Like a dingle berry I can't scrape off. Chaps my azz.
 

Larry Gude

Strung Out
No glaring inconsistencies.

We'll disbatch 1 or 2 to your accident and you can wait 20 minutes IF they require additional personnel

Disbatch 30 to me or my family as the inital disbatch. I'll say thank you and return them to service if they aren't required.

I'll spell it out; if 30 are at your motorcycle accident, it's going to be tough to get many to your family.


I find it illustrative that this has struck such a raw nerve.

I don't think that at all. This area has a wonderful EMS system. Have you ever once heard of an emergency in this tri-county area where there wasn't enough man power? We aren't talking World Trade Center Disaster, they didn't even have enough man power for that. We are talking typical house fire, building fire, accident incident. If we don't have enough man power in the tri-county area, they'll call out the next county. Many times our county volunteers fill in for other paid counties. :razz:

You are a real pain in the azz, you know that? Like a dingle berry I can't scrape off. Chaps my azz.

You'll excuse me if I can't tell what you think?
 

bohman

Well-Known Member
Wait. So, is it possible to have too many EMS people on a scene? Is that what we're saying? :jerry:

The ONLY reason this got started was because my initial reaction at seeing over 20 some odd people IN ONE picture was 'Wow. That makes no sense to me." and all I got was everything BUT interest that maybe, just maybe, some improvements are needed. I got reasons WHY there were so many. I got reasons that the number was just right. I got reasons it may well have not been enough. I got real world reasons that too many is bed (victim getting stepped on) is a command, not numbers, problem.

I got nothing discussing a more efficient use and allocation of resources.

You mention my business and this is why I reacted the way I did; every single day we look at how many people we have, what do we need, how to balance needs, the unpredictable nature of the thing, equipment, rent, buy, part time, full time, no one knows more than a small business person how challenging this is.

A leader in our industry promoted some time back the concept of fact based conversations so as to avoid the kind of useless, pithy comments that sometimes get in the way of things working better.

If, in fact, 20-30 people is proper allocation and use of resources, so be it. To me, it struck me as absurd.

And, once again, thank you to everyone who does EMS work. Desire for efficiency and good allocation of resources is not opposition to you. It is, frankly, support for you. :buddies:

Of course it's possible to have too many.

And thank you for the bolded point; I never understand those who think that if you care about something, you must never criticize it. If I didn't give a crap about it, I wouldn't waste my breath suggesting improvements.

Let me sum it up for you. Keep your ass up the road and you don't need to worry about how many people show up in St. Mary's County for 1 motorcycle accident.

How's that?

There you go, Larry, problem solved! :killingme
 

Larry Gude

Strung Out
There you go, Larry, problem solved! :killingme

I called Fredneck EMS to report a man down, chewed up ass, bruised and hurt feeling (I only have one), and you know what they told me?


"Deal with it, pal. We've got an emergency in Southern Maryland and have to back them up. Seems a moped fell over or something..."

:evil:
 
Top