Chopticon64
Well-Known Member
N/A
Last edited:

Fixed (although there are other choices).He's right though. Larrys being a bitch. Make a fvucking CHOICE, Larry!!!!! You need to decide who you think will be best, and like the rest of us, you get Turd Sandwich and Giant Douche to choose from.
I don't get that republicans in Maryland won't vote for Hogan. It's Maryland, what do you people want? The last republican senator for Maryland was Mathias who left office in 1987. He was succeeded by Mikulski who was a die hard liberal. Maryland has not had even the most remote possibility of a republican senator until now. I understand that Hogan is not a far right conservative. If that's what you want for your senator you need to move the F out of one of the top 10 liberal states in America. If it makes that big of a deal to you, why do you still live here? Bottom line is that Hogan won't vote 100% of the time with republicans. But he will vote 75% with them. And I would think that is better than Alsobrooks who will vote 0% of the time with republicans. I just don't understand republicans who won't vote for Hogan.
Odd. You expect us to vote out of party unity, but not Larry. I don't expect him to be far right. Although I might quibble over what you think that term means.
I'll vote for him, but he's being a bitch by not voting. Just as he could very well when Trump was President and running for reelection simply have refused to make critical remarks. It's not like the Maryland Dems were going to override him less than they did.
See. AC22 and I are having thing called a conversation. Where you debate a point without calling anyone named. You use facts and logic to explain your point. Beats the hell out of lying and name calling.You’re in the wrong forum, this is the home of cultist or blue haired freaks.
The somd.com you knew is long gone, don’t waste your thoughtful energy, let me show you the door, you sweet intelligent man.
I'm not really saying vote out of party unity, but I can see how you got there. I don't like either party. I subscribe to the founding father's view that parties will destroy the democracy they were building. They just could not figure out how to prevent them.
My thing is if you are a conservative, you have to play percentages and get what you can get. Hogan isn't a far right conservative, but fiscally he was decent. He cut taxes and fees, and he cancelled the red line in Baltimore which was a spending nightmare.
I do agree he should have voted for someone for president. It's not a good look. Still better than Alsobrooks who wants to expand the supreme court so that liberals can get their way, and wants to get rid of the senate filibuster. The senate is a 6 year term. This year the senate may flip making her vote inconsequential. But in two years, it could flip again and it will make her vote mean something. I would rather have Hogan voting against democrat radical left proposals than Alsobrooks voting for them.