N/A

glhs837

Power with Control
He's right though. Larrys being a bitch. Make a fvucking CHOICE, Larry!!!!! You need to decide who you think will be best, and like the rest of us, you get these two to choose from.
 

OccamsRazor

Well-Known Member
So this man is saying he wants to represent the people of Maryland in one of the highest political offices that can be attained YET, tells us he refuses to exercise thee most important and valuable political tool/right that he possesses?

Brilliant move! :doh:
 

jrt_ms1995

Well-Known Member
He's right though. Larrys being a bitch. Make a fvucking CHOICE, Larry!!!!! You need to decide who you think will be best, and like the rest of us, you get Turd Sandwich and Giant Douche to choose from.
Fixed (although there are other choices).
 

LightRoasted

If I may ...
For your consideration ...

"Hogan said Tuesday that he will not be voting in the 2024 U.S. presidential election."

Now watch that fool lose by one vote.
 

22AcaciaAve

Well-Known Member
I don't get that republicans in Maryland won't vote for Hogan. It's Maryland, what do you people want? The last republican senator for Maryland was Mathias who left office in 1987. He was succeeded by Mikulski who was a die hard liberal. Maryland has not had even the most remote possibility of a republican senator until now. I understand that Hogan is not a far right conservative. If that's what you want for your senator you need to move the F out of one of the top 10 liberal states in America. If it makes that big of a deal to you, why do you still live here? Bottom line is that Hogan won't vote 100% of the time with republicans. But he will vote 75% with them. And I would think that is better than Alsobrooks who will vote 0% of the time with republicans. I just don't understand republicans who won't vote for Hogan.
 

WingsOfGold

Well-Known Member
No dog in this fight, I left the shithole 10 or so years ago for good.
The animals in PG, Mont Co, Charles, Balt City, Balt Co will vote for the tax cheat colored bitch. Md is a forever lost cause.
That being said Hogan is the lesser of 2 evils.
 

glhs837

Power with Control
I don't get that republicans in Maryland won't vote for Hogan. It's Maryland, what do you people want? The last republican senator for Maryland was Mathias who left office in 1987. He was succeeded by Mikulski who was a die hard liberal. Maryland has not had even the most remote possibility of a republican senator until now. I understand that Hogan is not a far right conservative. If that's what you want for your senator you need to move the F out of one of the top 10 liberal states in America. If it makes that big of a deal to you, why do you still live here? Bottom line is that Hogan won't vote 100% of the time with republicans. But he will vote 75% with them. And I would think that is better than Alsobrooks who will vote 0% of the time with republicans. I just don't understand republicans who won't vote for Hogan.

Odd. You expect us to vote out of party unity, but not Larry. I don't expect him to be far right. Although I might quibble over what you think that term means.

I'll vote for him, but he's being a bitch by not voting. Just as he could very well when Trump was President and running for reelection simply have refused to make critical remarks. It's not like the Maryland Dems were going to override him less than they did.
 

22AcaciaAve

Well-Known Member
Odd. You expect us to vote out of party unity, but not Larry. I don't expect him to be far right. Although I might quibble over what you think that term means.

I'll vote for him, but he's being a bitch by not voting. Just as he could very well when Trump was President and running for reelection simply have refused to make critical remarks. It's not like the Maryland Dems were going to override him less than they did.

I'm not really saying vote out of party unity, but I can see how you got there. I don't like either party. I subscribe to the founding father's view that parties will destroy the democracy they were building. They just could not figure out how to prevent them.

My thing is if you are a conservative, you have to play percentages and get what you can get. Hogan isn't a far right conservative, but fiscally he was decent. He cut taxes and fees, and he cancelled the red line in Baltimore which was a spending nightmare.

I do agree he should have voted for someone for president. It's not a good look. Still better than Alsobrooks who wants to expand the supreme court so that liberals can get their way, and wants to get rid of the senate filibuster. The senate is a 6 year term. This year the senate may flip making her vote inconsequential. But in two years, it could flip again and it will make her vote mean something. I would rather have Hogan voting against democrat radical left proposals than Alsobrooks voting for them.
 

glhs837

Power with Control
You’re in the wrong forum, this is the home of cultist or blue haired freaks.

The somd.com you knew is long gone, don’t waste your thoughtful energy, let me show you the door, you sweet intelligent man.
See. AC22 and I are having thing called a conversation. Where you debate a point without calling anyone named. You use facts and logic to explain your point. Beats the hell out of lying and name calling.
I'm not really saying vote out of party unity, but I can see how you got there. I don't like either party. I subscribe to the founding father's view that parties will destroy the democracy they were building. They just could not figure out how to prevent them.

My thing is if you are a conservative, you have to play percentages and get what you can get. Hogan isn't a far right conservative, but fiscally he was decent. He cut taxes and fees, and he cancelled the red line in Baltimore which was a spending nightmare.

I do agree he should have voted for someone for president. It's not a good look. Still better than Alsobrooks who wants to expand the supreme court so that liberals can get their way, and wants to get rid of the senate filibuster. The senate is a 6 year term. This year the senate may flip making her vote inconsequential. But in two years, it could flip again and it will make her vote mean something. I would rather have Hogan voting against democrat radical left proposals than Alsobrooks voting for them.

He was better than the one before and after. True. I think he'll be most like Manchin, which isn't bad. I do wish he'd simply said I'm not saying who. Each side would have excoriated him but that would have passed and each side could have believed he was secretly voting for their side.
 
Top