Nadler Gives Republicans One Week To ‘Participate’ In Impeachment Inquiry

GURPS

INGSOC
PREMO Member
“The Democratic-led House Judiciary Committee, which is due to begin weighing possible articles of impeachment against Trump next week, sent a two-page letter to the president setting a deadline of 5 p.m. EDT (2200 GMT) on Dec. 6 for the president’s counsel to specify intended actions under the committee’s impeachment procedures,” the Caller reported the letter as saying.

This week, the inquiry moves from the House Intelligence Committee, which concluded its “fact-finding”mission a week ago, to the House Judiciary Committee, which will handle the legalistic aspect of the impeachment, hosting a final “trial” in the House before the House votes on whether to impeach the President outright. Nadler, the chairman of that Committee claims he’s batting cleanup for the House Intelligence Committee, pushing Republicans who he says have refused to participate in the inquiry thus far, to step up in inquiry’s final week.

https://www.dailywire.com/news/deadline-jerry-nadler-gives-republicans-one-week-to-participate-in-impeachment-inquiry
 

Pete

Repete
In other news the House Parliamentarian is investigating 5 dozen missing Krispy Kreme donuts form the House cafeteria.......
 

gary_webb

Damned glad to meet you
In other news the House Parliamentarian is investigating 5 dozen missing Krispy Kreme donuts form the House cafeteria.......
And until they are found, we're all going to have to tighten our lap bands and do less with more.
 

stgislander

Well-Known Member
“The Democratic-led House Judiciary Committee, which is due to begin weighing possible articles of impeachment against Trump next week, sent a two-page letter to the president setting a deadline of 5 p.m. EDT (2200 GMT) on Dec. 6 for the president’s counsel to specify intended actions under the committee’s impeachment procedures,” the Caller reported the letter as saying.

This week, the inquiry moves from the House Intelligence Committee, which concluded its “fact-finding”mission a week ago, to the House Judiciary Committee, which will handle the legalistic aspect of the impeachment, hosting a final “trial” in the House before the House votes on whether to impeach the President outright. Nadler, the chairman of that Committee claims he’s batting cleanup for the House Intelligence Committee, pushing Republicans who he says have refused to participate in the inquiry thus far, to step up in inquiry’s final week.

https://www.dailywire.com/news/deadline-jerry-nadler-gives-republicans-one-week-to-participate-in-impeachment-inquiry
Again, I think the WH should just say, "No thanks. We'll make our case in the Senate."
 

Stjohns3269

Active Member
After Trump and the GOP spent weeks crying about how they weren't allowed to participate in the process and now they say they won't participate in the process once they are invited formally.

Such a bunch of whiners.
 
Last edited:

This_person

Well-Known Member
This ^^

Screw the House. Do it, you chickenshits! Jump!
I've got to agree. As a general rule, the accused does not get to go before the grand jury and make their case, that's ALL prosecution. Historically, the prosecution was not single-party like this, but it still it's "legal".

For Clinton, there were 31 Democrats who agreed and voted to open the House investigation. For Trump's, the only bi-partisan vote was against opening the investigation. You'd think the Democrats would have learned from the failed Clinton attempts, but apparently they're not smart enough to learn from history (look at how many are socialists).

Interesting to see what happens when Schiff gets called to testify.
 

Stjohns3269

Active Member
I've got to agree. As a general rule, the accused does not get to go before the grand jury and make their case, that's ALL prosecution. Historically, the prosecution was not single-party like this, but it still it's "legal".

For Clinton, there were 31 Democrats who agreed and voted to open the House investigation. For Trump's, the only bi-partisan vote was against opening the investigation. You'd think the Democrats would have learned from the failed Clinton attempts, but apparently they're not smart enough to learn from history (look at how many are socialists).

Interesting to see what happens when Schiff gets called to testify.
Interesting you would rather Schiff testify than Trump. Shows your priorities.

Schiff has no direct knowledge of whether or not Trump tried to extort Ukraine. Trump does as do all the other people he has blocked from testifying. As do the transcripts he refuses to release.

Seems any of that could settle the matter a lot sooner than Schiff testifying.

What exactly would you propose Schiff be asked that would in anyway change our understanding of the phone call in question?
 

This_person

Well-Known Member
Interesting you would rather Schiff testify than Trump. Shows your priorities.

Schiff has no direct knowledge of whether or not Trump tried to extort Ukraine. Trump does as do all the other people he has blocked from testifying. As do the transcripts he refuses to release.

Seems any of that could settle the matter a lot sooner than Schiff testifying.
Have you ever heard of or read the fifth amendment to the constitution?

What exactly would you propose Schiff be asked that would in anyway change our understanding of the phone call in question?
Why it was investigated.
 

limblips

Well-Known Member
PREMO Member
Interesting you would rather Schiff testify than Trump. Shows your priorities.

Schiff has no direct knowledge of whether or not Trump tried to extort Ukraine. Trump does as do all the other people he has blocked from testifying. As do the transcripts he refuses to release.

Seems any of that could settle the matter a lot sooner than Schiff testifying.

What exactly would you propose Schiff be asked that would in anyway change our understanding of the phone call in question?
First I would ask why the investigation began based solely on an third party witness. Second I would ask do you know who the whistleblower is and when did you find out who it is? Third I would ask why did the accusation go from Quid Pro Quo to extortion to bribery?

This may be surprising to you but the people conducting an investigation have the same requirement to be truthful and fair as the accused. Schiff is neither.
 

Stjohns3269

Active Member
Have you ever heard of or read the fifth amendment to the constitution?


Why it was investigated.
Do you often ask that of the police when they discover crime?

Do you ask the firemen who called them after they put out the fire?

why are you more concerned with why a crime was Investigated than the actual crime?
 

Stjohns3269

Active Member
First I would ask why the investigation began based solely on an third party witness. Second I would ask do you know who the whistleblower is and when did you find out who it is? Third I would ask why did the accusation go from Quid Pro Quo to extortion to bribery?

This may be surprising to you but the people conducting an investigation have the same requirement to be truthful and fair as the accused. Schiff is neither.
Do you really not understand that Quid Pro Quo and extortion/bribery are the same thing?

Why are you complaining about an investigation the point of which is to get to the truth? How else would they go about doing that other than calling witnesses and investigating.

Why have you allowed Fox News to poison your mind into thinking anything untoward has happened so far.

The only people not following the rules so far have been members of the GOP on two occasions.
 

GURPS

INGSOC
PREMO Member
Do you often ask that of the police when they discover crime?
Do the Police invent crimes based in OPINION on Public Policy ?

Do you ask the firemen who called them after they put out the fire?
Irrelevant posturing Fire has NOTHING to do with the discussion, you are deflecting and doding

why are you more concerned with why a crime was Investigated than the actual crime?
A crime must 1st be commited, not some arrogant co ck munch pissed off Trump did not take his OPINION on a particular topic, going and whining to the press
 

Stjohns3269

Active Member
Do the Police invent crimes based in OPINION on Public Policy ?



Irrelevant posturing Fire has NOTHING to do with the discussion, you are deflecting and doding



A crime must 1st be commited, not some arrogant co ck munch pissed off Trump did not take his OPINION on a particular topic, going and whining to the press
Why are you foaming at the mouth so much you are not making sense. What are you even trying to say.
 
Top