Navy investigating alleged filming of women

[Misfit]

http://www.kitsapsun.com/news/local...ing-alleged-filming-of-stennis-women_47474662

PACIFIC OCEAN — The Navy is investigating an incident last week aboard the USS John C. Stennis in which a sailor allegedly filmed female officers inside their bathroom.

According to a document the Navy released to the Navy Times, a 33-year-old lieutenant was trying to film with a handheld electronic device held to a ventilation grate. When a woman approached, he said he was sorry and left. She later identified him and ship security took his personal electronic devices.

The suspect was flown off the ship with an escort and reported back to his chain of command, said Cmdr. Jeanette Groeneveld, Naval Air Forces Pacific spokeswoman. No more information will be released while the investigation is in progress, she said. It is expected to take a few weeks.

 

[Gummie]

Does this mean that all hands will have to stand down for another "Tailhook"?

 

[Misfit]

Does this mean that all hands will have to stand down for another "Tailhook"?

I foresee months of training for enlisted.

 

[b23hqb]

I foresee months of training for enlisted.

"All hands on" training.

 

[Bann]

I foresee months of training for enlisted.

Why would the enlisted have to be trained, when it was an officer filming other officers?

#mensbehavingbadly

 

[Misfit]

Why would the enlisted have to be trained, when it was an officer filming other officers?

#mensbehavingbadly

I was active duty enlisted Navy when tailhook happened. We spent countless hours in sexual harassment training after that. I never did understand why.

 

[nutz]

Why would the enlisted have to be trained, when it was an officer filming other officers?

#mensbehavingbadly

A 33 year old lieutenant would tend to indicate
a) not too bright
b) prior enlisted

Assuming b is the most correct, it's the enlisted serviceman's fault and they need to fully understand their behavior can't be tolerated.

 

[Bann]

A 33 year old lieutenant would tend to indicate
a) not too bright
b) prior enlisted

Assuming b is the most correct, it's the enlisted serviceman's fault and they need to fully understand their behavior can't be tolerated.

Not too bright would apply to all ranks, ages & genders, for that matter, in this case. People are so freaking stupid, I swear.