Newly released Epstein files Trump orally raped 14 year old girl

StmarysCity79

Well-Known Member
We were discussing one specific incident related to new Epstein documents and you took a tangent to a completely different situation with a different person, and I responded that specific situation that was the new focus of the conversation. The response to your tangent is not applicable to the original topic. Again, do you not understand how conversations work?

Don't bother responding. You're on ignore.


Funny how when you guys are faced with Trumps criminality you suddenly can't respond anymore.
 

Bare-ya-cuda

Well-Known Member
Funny how when you guys are faced with Trumps criminality you suddenly can't respond anymore.
Trump was NEVER on the island. FACT.
Sources PBS, ABC, Washington Post, etc

Based on public records, flight logs, and recent document releases as of February 2, 2026, there is no evidence that Donald Trump ever visited Jeffrey Epstein’s private island, Little St. James.
Official Records and Testimony
Flight Logs: Passenger manifests from Epstein’s private jets show that Trump flew on the aircraft at least eight times between 1993 and 1996. However, all recorded trips were between Palm Beach, New York, and Washington, D.C., with none destined for the U.S. Virgin Islands.
Witness Testimony: Virginia Giuffre, a prominent victim of Epstein, stated in sworn depositions that she never saw Trump at Epstein's island or other homes. She further testified that she did not believe Trump was involved in any of Epstein's illegal activities.
Government Documents: A massive release of over 3.5 million pages of Epstein-related files by the Department of Justice in early 2026 contained references to Trump due to their social relationship in the 1990s, but investigators stated the files contained no credible evidence linking him to the island or any crimes.
 

gary_webb

Damned glad to meet you
Funny how when you guys are faced with Trumps criminality you suddenly can't respond anymore.
We're busy having fun with Bill.
Bill.png
Bill2.png
 

CPUSA

Well-Known Member
Funny how when you guys are faced with Trumps criminality you suddenly can't respond anymore.
Why respond?
We just wait 24-72 hrs for the hoaxes to get debunked...

Is it our fault you're too stupid to see a blatant hoax or lie? That's not on us...blame the parents & teachers who saw no future in educating you...
 
Last edited:

DaSDGuy

Well-Known Member
Don't feel too bad for SMC00. It got stuck swimming in the outhouse and had to drink it's way out.
 

gary_webb

Damned glad to meet you
I bet it took you hours to make that.


Sounds like you have CDS. Clinton Derangement Syndrome
CDS stands for Controlled Dangerous Substance.

I understand your lack of brain activity though. Dealing with your CJD (Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease) has got to be hard for you.
 

StmarysCity79

Well-Known Member
A second hand (mouth) story that was proven not credible.. never charged, nor convicted.

Yes. dummy that is what we are discussing. The Epstein files which contain unverified stories as Epstein is dead and only MAxwell has been charged.

But you are lying about this story being proven not credible. Please provide your proof.
 

BOP

Well-Known Member
Funny how when you guys are faced with Trumps criminality you suddenly can't respond anymore.
You might find it instructive to look up the Dale Akiki case in San Diego from the early '90s. Despite a complete lack of evidence; physical capability on Akiki's part; the absurd accusations against him, the DA and the Sheriff at the time essentially tried this case in public, on the local TV stations.

How absurd? Read on, McDuff:

The trial against Akiki started in the spring of 1993. The prosecution produced no physical evidence but did present allegations of satanic ritual abuse, including testimony that he had killed a giraffe and an elephant in front of the children, had drunk human blood in satanic rituals, and had abducted the children away from the church, despite his being unable to drive.[7] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Faith_Chapel_Church_ritual_abuse_case

In case you're a Somalian, I'm bringing this up because 99.99% of the allegations against President Trump fall into the category of the absurd. There's never any credible evidence; never any 1st hand witnesses; only vague allegations based on (always) anonymous or unnamed sources.
 

StmarysCity79

Well-Known Member
You might find it instructive to look up the Dale Akiki case in San Diego from the early '90s. Despite a complete lack of evidence; physical capability on Akiki's part; the absurd accusations against him, the DA and the Sheriff at the time essentially tried this case in public, on the local TV stations.

How absurd? Read on, McDuff:



In case you're a Somalian, I'm bringing this up because 99.99% of the allegations against President Trump fall into the category of the absurd. There's never any credible evidence; never any 1st hand witnesses; only vague allegations based on (always) anonymous or unnamed sources.

Exceot when he was found liable for digitally raping a woman.

Except for when his University was found guilty of fraud and ordered to close and pay a fine

Except when his childrens cancer chairty was found to have been stelaing the funds and it was closed and made to agree not to operate any other charities.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: BOP

WingsOfGold

Well-Known Member
Exceot when he was found liable for digitally raping a woman.

Except for when his University was found guilty of fraud and ordered to close and pay a fine

Except when his childrens cancer chairty was found to have been stelaing the funds and it was closed and made to agree not to operate any other charities.
You're getting so neurotic that even your spell checker is phucked up.
 
Top