SmallTown
Football season!
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A20093-2003Aug5.html
not exactly scientific, but a fun read
not exactly scientific, but a fun read
No Way!
- Thread starter SmallTown
- Start date
J
justhangn
Guest
Only a liberal would believe this hogwash!!!!!!!
"A new Harvard study says the conservative editorial pages are more intensely partisan, and far less willing to criticize a Republican administration than the liberal pages are to take on a Democratic administration."
"A new Harvard study says the conservative editorial pages are more intensely partisan, and far less willing to criticize a Republican administration than the liberal pages are to take on a Democratic administration."
Don't they have the professors who slit their babies throats? Don't they also have the ones who say that you should be able to abort your child up to 5 years of age?
About as unbiased as that Berkeley study a week or so ago.
How can I trust the opinion of someone who refers to Bush supporters as "Bushies"?
Would a Clinton supporter trust the opinion of someone who called him a "Clintonista" or referred to Clinton as "Slick Willie" or "Herr Klinton"?
I'm surprised I didn't see "Shrub" in there.
Ok, ok.
Praise and criticism is hardly something that can be measured objectively. I don't believe for a minute that Clinton supporters were more apt to criticize him than Bush supporters are to criticize Bush. **THAT** in itself is a judgment call. To me, when someone says "it was all about sex" they're really saying "I support Clinton, right or wrong". If I say that I think the Dems are making way too much over the SOTU/uranium flap, I'd be called "supporting Bush" even if I also say I think he shouldn't have put spurious information in there to prove a point. See what I mean? It's a matter of opinion.
NOW this guy who does this study happens to BE liberal, and surprise, surprise, his "objective" study supports what he believes to begin with.
Was ANYONE surprised by that?
How can I trust the opinion of someone who refers to Bush supporters as "Bushies"?
Would a Clinton supporter trust the opinion of someone who called him a "Clintonista" or referred to Clinton as "Slick Willie" or "Herr Klinton"?
I'm surprised I didn't see "Shrub" in there.
Ok, ok.
Praise and criticism is hardly something that can be measured objectively. I don't believe for a minute that Clinton supporters were more apt to criticize him than Bush supporters are to criticize Bush. **THAT** in itself is a judgment call. To me, when someone says "it was all about sex" they're really saying "I support Clinton, right or wrong". If I say that I think the Dems are making way too much over the SOTU/uranium flap, I'd be called "supporting Bush" even if I also say I think he shouldn't have put spurious information in there to prove a point. See what I mean? It's a matter of opinion.
NOW this guy who does this study happens to BE liberal, and surprise, surprise, his "objective" study supports what he believes to begin with.
Was ANYONE surprised by that?