Not Guilty!

transporter

Well-Known Member
And yet:

“While this report does not conclude that the president committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him,” Attorney General William Barr quoted Mueller as writing in his report on the issue of possible obstruction of justice.
What Barr's summary does not do, under any circumstance, is make Trump qualified and fit to be President. It does not make him a competent manager or negotiator. It does not make him a qualified judge of talent (in fact this entire episode proves beyond doubt how lackadasical and inept Trump and his family is at hiring quality people).

So the ignorati will cheer...the rest of us will still wait for the details from the report AND we everyone will still know how inept, incompetent and unfit Donald Trump is to be President.
 

Hijinx

Well-Known Member
I just finished reading Mueller's Synopsis of the report.
Mueller spent 2 years finding nothing about any collusion.

IMO if the report does nothing else it found that the Russians were reading Hillary's emails.
If the report does anything it should lead to an indictment for Hillary.
 

gary_webb

Damned glad to meet you
And yet:



What Barr's summary does not do, under any circumstance, is make Trump qualified and fit to be President. It does not make him a competent manager or negotiator. It does not make him a qualified judge of talent (in fact this entire episode proves beyond doubt how lackadasical and inept Trump and his family is at hiring quality people).

So the ignorati will cheer...the rest of us will still wait for the details from the report AND we everyone will still know how inept, incompetent and unfit Donald Trump is to be President.
:killingme
 

Yooper

Childhood idol: George Washington, Fighter Pilot
PREMO Member
That's all.
I think the more accurate thread title would be, "No Evidence." "Not Guilty" implies there was a valid charge, but insufficient evidence to obtain a conviction or the jury/judge was not persuaded.

This was not that. This was a case where the "grand jury" found nothing. Thus, "No Case."

--- End of line (MCP)
 

stgislander

Well-Known Member
From my reading of Barr's preliminary conclusions, it's kinda hard to prove obstruction if no proof was found that the Trump campaign coordinated with the Russians.
 

PeoplesElbow

Well-Known Member
They knew from the beginning that there was nothing. The hopes were that weaponizing a charge would cause impeachment, resignation etc.
 

PsyOps

Pixelated
And yet:



What Barr's summary does not do, under any circumstance, is make Trump qualified and fit to be President. It does not make him a competent manager or negotiator. It does not make him a qualified judge of talent (in fact this entire episode proves beyond doubt how lackadasical and inept Trump and his family is at hiring quality people).

So the ignorati will cheer...the rest of us will still wait for the details from the report AND we everyone will still know how inept, incompetent and unfit Donald Trump is to be President.
135903
 

Midnightrider

Well-Known Member
The irony in barr determining trump didn’t commit obstruction because he didn’t have ‘intent’is freaking incredible.
 

Grumpy

Well-Known Member
For you Dems out there, think about this..Mueller's staff was made up of a vast majority of Democrats. Some even worked for Hillary at one time or another. Do you honestly think that they didn't turn over every stone, twig or whatever during this witchhunt?? Mueller had a staff that wanted BADLY to get Trump on something and they couldn't find anything to recommend any type of indictment.
 

Hijinx

Well-Known Member
Mueller said NO collusion. Then he got wishy-washy over the obstruction they made up.
They can't prove obstruction , Mueller didn't have the balls to say there was none so now its the hot topic.
Something to keep crying over.

Now the Russian BS will stop and the obstruction will go on.

Then Dershowittz kissed Hillary's ass.
 

Ken King

A little rusty but not crusty
PREMO Member
Seems pretty clear to me, "...Rod Rosenstein and I have concluded that the evidence developed during the Special Counsel's investigation is not sufficient to establish that the President committed an obstruction-of-justice offense." In other words, the incompetent buffoon must be smarter then some of the best prosecutors in the USA to get away with that. Or the firings and innocuous comments about taking it easy on Flynn weren't illegal.
 
Top