Is that allowed? You would think that if Hillary did win the nomination and was deemed to be not qualified, it would go to the runner up???
Interesting. I guess the establish thinks the same be it d or r: how to thwart the people.
The gop mostly gave up on getting around trump before he secured nomination.
Not so fast...I saw something on the news this morning about a "big announcement" coming from Bill Kristol soon about a new independent candidate that he and his cronies are going to put forward.
Bolton?
No idea...
An article(actually a blog) was posted over the weekend on Huffpo stating all of that but was taken down almost immediately with no explanation. It laid out the whole strategy that the DNC was taking, all based on anonymous sources.--but the whispers around Washington are that Hillary will be indicted AFTER her nomination so that Biden can be drafted for November.
And the Democratic Party supports the idea.
An article(actually a blog) was posted over the weekend on Huffpo stating all of that but was taken down almost immediately with no explanation. It laid out the whole strategy that the DNC was taking, all based on anonymous sources.
I think they have to weigh in on the likelihood of Sanders supporters going ape#### over the maneuver. One, however moderate and likable Uncle Joe is to moderates, he's the VP. He's more of the same. He's more digestible than Hillary, but he's not Sanders and he doesn't speak for them.
So I think the switch will piss them off - a lot. .
--but the whispers around Washington are that Hillary will be indicted AFTER her nomination so that Biden can be drafted for November.
And the Democratic Party supports the idea.
They're also talking a 3rd party candidate. They slip Biden in there after she's indicted, then a 3rd party Conservative Candidate to split the Republican vote and viola, you got another 4 years of a dumbass Dem in the White House.--but the whispers around Washington are that Hillary will be indicted AFTER her nomination so that Biden can be drafted for November.
And the Democratic Party supports the idea.
They should have tapped Biden in the first place, the big dummies, but then we wouldn't have had these last few highly entertaining months.
I wish someone would write a tell-all book about this election because the behind the scenes must be fascinating.
They're also talking a 3rd party candidate. They slip Biden in there after she's indicted, then a 3rd party Conservative Candidate to split the Republican vote and viola, you got another 4 years of a dumbass Dem in the White House.
They're also talking a 3rd party candidate. They slip Biden in there after she's indicted, then a 3rd party Conservative Candidate to split the Republican vote and viola, you got another 4 years of a dumbass Dem in the White House.
They're also talking a 3rd party candidate. They slip Biden in there after she's indicted, then a 3rd party Conservative Candidate to split the Republican vote and viola, you got another 4 years of a dumbass Dem in the White House.
No, this is not just conspiracy theory. It's happened before.Yup Sam, you put this thread in the perfect section.
And that's it. It would depend on who they threw in as the 3rd party candidate to mess things up.That is the interesting feature of this, who would be the 3rd candidate and what would their participation mean? Perot got in solely to see to it that his grudge with 41 was settled.
Nader got in because...well...because AlGore.
Trump and Bernie ARE 3rd party style candidates.
I can't imagine a GOP/anyone but Trump type (Cruz, Bolton, whomever) actually getting in such is the hatred of Hillary and the pure desire to win whatever it takes. But, it's possible.
Bernie couldn't do it. He'd throw away everything he's gained, the power to push some of his agenda.
So, what of Johnson? I am thinking he pulls evenly from the middle so, would he really hurt either one of them, Don or Hil?