Suz
33 yrs & we r still n luv
I didn't know which area to put this. Hope this is right but it may not even matter......
Question: Does a notary have specific guidlines or oath that they should follow?
In theory I thought if they were notarizing someone's signature on a document that specified the person was 'signing of their own free will' and not being forced to--that they should ask the question- not make an assumption. To protect themselves if nothing else. And if they were informed prior to the signing that the person wasn't signing freely, shouldn't that throw up a red flag???
synopsis of what happened:
Parents had papers drawn up to take physical custody of minor child (birth mother is a minor also) from their daughter SUPPOSEDLY for medical purposes.
Daughter did not want to sign, father said you will sign or "else." Father is a SOB and the daughter is scared to death of him.
Lawyers office was called (by me) informing secretary (notary) that she (babies mother) was being forced to sign the papers against her will. Didn't hold nothing back-told her who I was and why I was involved (my grand daughter). I thought that would end it there. (course I was using the logic from my banking days-if we had any clue someone was being forced to make withdrawals we were obligated to have all the accounts locked to protect the account holder).
Tuesday the Father drove daughter to lawyers office and everything was completed/signed.
Is not the notary under any kind of obligation to protect the individuals involved? I am really pissed here. Mainly because as I told the girls mother-there is no reason for them to have custody as the baby is covered through Maryland's medicare system. But I am mainly pissed that the notary allowed her to sign the papers!!! What good it will do them I don't know. The papers also require my son's signature and he is not going to sign it. (I'm hoping that fact alone makes it a dead issue, but if needed I will get a lawyer myself). The lawyer sent a 2nd copy to us yesterday-this time with original signatures, notary seals, and the babies name filled in. Course they used the mothers last name and the baby has ours...... (they are STUPID people).
So what say you legal eyed people. Did the notary f up or was she legally within her rights/boundries to notarize the signature???
Question: Does a notary have specific guidlines or oath that they should follow?
In theory I thought if they were notarizing someone's signature on a document that specified the person was 'signing of their own free will' and not being forced to--that they should ask the question- not make an assumption. To protect themselves if nothing else. And if they were informed prior to the signing that the person wasn't signing freely, shouldn't that throw up a red flag???
synopsis of what happened:
Parents had papers drawn up to take physical custody of minor child (birth mother is a minor also) from their daughter SUPPOSEDLY for medical purposes.
Daughter did not want to sign, father said you will sign or "else." Father is a SOB and the daughter is scared to death of him.
Lawyers office was called (by me) informing secretary (notary) that she (babies mother) was being forced to sign the papers against her will. Didn't hold nothing back-told her who I was and why I was involved (my grand daughter). I thought that would end it there. (course I was using the logic from my banking days-if we had any clue someone was being forced to make withdrawals we were obligated to have all the accounts locked to protect the account holder).
Tuesday the Father drove daughter to lawyers office and everything was completed/signed.
Is not the notary under any kind of obligation to protect the individuals involved? I am really pissed here. Mainly because as I told the girls mother-there is no reason for them to have custody as the baby is covered through Maryland's medicare system. But I am mainly pissed that the notary allowed her to sign the papers!!! What good it will do them I don't know. The papers also require my son's signature and he is not going to sign it. (I'm hoping that fact alone makes it a dead issue, but if needed I will get a lawyer myself). The lawyer sent a 2nd copy to us yesterday-this time with original signatures, notary seals, and the babies name filled in. Course they used the mothers last name and the baby has ours...... (they are STUPID people).
So what say you legal eyed people. Did the notary f up or was she legally within her rights/boundries to notarize the signature???