Obama and McCain Tax Proposals

dn0121

New Member

Attachments

  • GR2008061200193.gif
    GR2008061200193.gif
    72.3 KB · Views: 70

xusnret

New Member
"From a tax policy perspective, the approaches of the two candidates are vastly different. Senator Obama emphasizes who gets what, and Senator McCain focuses on economic growth and broadly reshaping how the tax system affects household and business decisions. To put it differently, one focuses on redistribution and the other focuses on improving economic incentives. Also, focusing on who gets what is, by its very nature, more near-term, while promoting economic growth is more long-term.

One cannot get a good picture of what the candidates are trying to achieve by considering only the individual tax or the business tax provisions. One needs to apply a more holistic approach and consider the full set of proposals. Senator Obama provides tax relief directly to individuals, without major changes in how the tax system interacts with or affects individual and business decision making. Senator McCain provides broad tax relief and channels most of it to businesses, with the notion that the best way to help workers is to encourage investment and ensure that the U.S. remains competitive in the global marketplace. The policies present very different choices: redistribution versus economic growth, and short run versus long term." Quote from:

The Tax Foundation - Senator McCain’s and Senator Obama’s Tax Plans: Different Roads Taken

To me the business growth approach is more feasible, no bandaids on todays problems and if they need to it would be easier to adjust the numbers later as the economy changes.
 

ylexot

Super Genius
Like I said in another thread, a person making $2.9M will go from 35% taxes to 60% taxes. Anybody who thinks that 60% taxes is fair has some serious mental issues.

Also, if I was looking at a change from 35% to 60% taxes, I'd leave the country in a heartbeat.
 

dn0121

New Member
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 4.01; Windows CE; PPC; 240x320))

xusnret said:
"From a tax policy perspective, the approaches of the two candidates are vastly different. ...

good post
 
Last edited:

jazz lady

~*~ Rara Avis ~*~
PREMO Member
Like I said in another thread, a person making $2.9M will go from 35% taxes to 60% taxes. Anybody who thinks that 60% taxes is fair has some serious mental issues.
But...but...but...why should you be REWARDED for working harder and getting more education than the fry cooker at Mickey Dee's? Geesh, how unsocialist of you. :sarcasm:

Also, if I was looking at a change from 35% to 60% taxes, I'd leave the country in a heartbeat.
Amen, brother. I pay more than my fair share of taxes and if you're going try to take that much from me, I can find a country that won't. :yay:
 

ylexot

Super Genius
I just looked at it again. The $700k (which was also shown in the other thread) is average, so it includes the increase to the mega-millionaires. Still, a change from 35% taxes to 46.5% taxes is insane.
 

SamSpade

Well-Known Member
Also, if I was looking at a change from 35% to 60% taxes, I'd leave the country in a heartbeat.

And the net result for the government is that they get NONE of your money.

This kind of thinking is killing the golden goose to get all of the golden eggs. It's shortsighted and stupid.
 
Top