Obama caging kids isn't news

Monello

Awww, jeez
PREMO Member
Just 1 more example of news outlets cherry picking stories based on who the president is at the time.

So the United States has “the world’s highest rate of children in detention.” Is this worth reporting? Maybe, maybe not. Nevertheless, Agence France-Presse, or AFP, and Reuters did report it, attributing the information to a “United Nations study” on migrant children detained at the US-Mexico border.

Then the two agencies retracted the story. Deleted, withdrew, demolished. Sheepishly, the two news organizations explained that, you see, the UN data was from 2015 — part of a border crackdown that had begun years earlier.

We all know who the president was in 2015. It wasn’t evil, child-caging monster President Trump. It was that nice, compassionate, child-caging monster President Barack Obama.

Zap. The story made Obama look bad. Hence the story was removed. Not updated or corrected, removed.

AFP and Reuters deleted a story that was, in a narrow sense, true — that a UN study claimed the United States had some 100,000 children in migrant-related detention. At any rate, what the agencies didn’t seem to like was the story’s changed implication: That Obama, rather than Trump, locked up a lot of children.
orange man bad
 

Kyle

Just being a fly in the ointment...
PREMO Member
One of these days, with a little luck, enough people will recognize the multifaceted leftist machine put together to manipulate and control the population and they'll rebel.

Then again... They may just go back to watching reruns of the Kardashians.
 

RoseRed

American Beauty
PREMO Member
One of these days, with a little luck, enough people will recognize the multifaceted leftist machine put together to manipulate and control the population and they'll rebel.

Then again... They may just go back to watching reruns of the Kardashians.
I'm afraid that your answer is the latter.
 

Makavide

Not too talkative
Top