Obamanet

GURPS

INGSOC
PREMO Member
From Internet to Obamanet

BlackBerry and AT&T are already making moves that could exploit new ‘utility’ regulations.​


Critics of President Obama’s “net neutrality” plan call it ObamaCare for the Internet.

That’s unfair to ObamaCare.

Both ObamaCare and “Obamanet” submit huge industries to complex regulations. Their supporters say the new rules had to be passed before anyone could read them. But at least ObamaCare claimed it would solve long-standing problems. Obamanet promises to fix an Internet that isn’t broken.

The permissionless Internet, which allows anyone to introduce a website, app or device without government review, ends this week. On Thursday the three Democrats among the five commissioners on the Federal Communications Commission will vote to regulate the Internet under rules written for monopoly utilities.

No one, including the bullied FCC chairman, Tom Wheeler, thought the agency would go this far. The big politicization came when President Obama in November demanded that the supposedly independent FCC apply the agency’s most extreme regulation to the Internet. A recent page-one Wall Street Journal story headlined “Net Neutrality: How White House Thwarted FCC Chief” documented “an unusual, secretive effort inside the White House . . . acting as a parallel version of the FCC itself.”





:whistle:
 

b23hqb

Well-Known Member
PREMO Member
Any other place to read the link? I'm not going to subscribe to the WSJ just for an occasional article.
 

merc669

New Member
So now we can look forward to Higher Rates, Slower Speeds, key word search alerts to eliminate the bad guys and girls, and also a requirement to have a Minimum Data Plan that meets Obama and Feds Minimum standards or you can buy one of several Obama Flavors of data plans. Those that do not have a data plan or it meet the Feds Minimum are subject to a new penalty tax in 2016. The new Obamanet subscription sites will be up to an efficient level sometime this fall.......:elaine:

Here is link to the WSJ that I had no problem getting to;
http://www.wsj.com/articles/l-gordon-crovitz-from-internet-to-obamanet-1424644324

And a couple of others;

http://www.cnbc.com/id/102450337

http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/inside-obamas-net-fix/article/2560377

http://www.usatoday.com/story/tech/2015/02/23/house-chairman-urges-fcc-transparency/23882079/
 
Last edited:

Bay_Kat

Tropical
So now we can look forward to Higher Rates, Slower Speeds, key word search alerts to eliminate the bad guys and girls, and also a requirement to have a Minimum Data Plan that meets Obama and Feds Minimum standards or you can buy one of several Obama Flavors of data plans. Those that do not have a data plan or it meet the Feds Minimum are subject to a new penalty tax in 2016. The new Obamanet subscription sites will be up to an efficient level sometime this fall.......:elaine:

I can't give an opinion until I see TJ and the rest come in and say what a good thing this is.
 

RPMDAD

Well-Known Member
Damn, i really don't want to go back to a dial up modem. I have enjoyed high speed internet till obama stuck his socialist a$$ into it. how many days till this guy is gone??
 

GURPS

INGSOC
PREMO Member
The second-class internet? You're soaking in it

Summary:Forget about net neutrality and balkanisation; Lenovo's Superfish idiocy proves that we already have a dual-class internet -- and most of us are proles.



Lenovo's original tone-deaf statement on the Superfish matter included a telling paragraph.

"In our effort to enhance our user experience, we pre-installed a piece of third-party software, Superfish (based in Palo Alto, CA), on some of our consumer notebooks. The goal was to improve the shopping experience using their visual discovery techniques," it said.

Lenovo went on to stress that Superfish's software wasn't anywhere in its enterprise devices -- let's face it, it wouldn't dare. But in order to "improve the shopping experience" -- because that's what consumers do, right? -- it thought it was perfectly fine to fiddle with the content of other organisations' web pages and give users something other than what they'd requested.

Is the word "arrogance" adequate to cover this sort of behaviour?

It sounds to me like if Lenovo were a car company, you'd start driving to your mother's house, but before you even got to the end of your street, the car would have decided to take a detour, pick up a few of its mates, and head out for pizza.

Lenovo is far from being the only example, of course. Do I need to list them?

Many of the sci-fi dystopias of the 1970s imagined the creation of a two-tier society, with one level for corporations and governments in an all-too-close alignment, and the other an endless advertising-riddled shopping mall for the proles. Well, it's already here.
 
Top