PsyOps
Pixelated
What digging. Barr clearly said Mueller identified 10 discrete instances where trump may have committed obstruction. He also said he didn’t see any criminal intent.
I’d like to read it for myself and decide. Are you just going to accept the AGs word for it?
Show me anywhere where someone (Barr or otherwise) said that Trump 'may have committed' obstruction.
And I know where you're going with this 'intent' crap. Comparing intent with Clinton's actions and with Trump's is apples to oranges. Trump fired Comey knowing full-well the investigation would continue. Trump had the authority to stop the whole thing, and never did. In order for Trump to have tried to obstruct justice, he had to have an intentional means to do so. In Hillary's case of mishandling classified, there is no requirement for intent; even though there was plenty of evidence of intent.
And this is why Mueller passed on making judgment of obstruction - because he cannot prove that Trump fired Comey with the intent of obstructing the investigation. In these cases, the presumption of innocence, devoid of concrete evidence, overrules.