I have no doubt that the hysterical frenzied Left will not accept that.
Outstanding synopsis. Spot onReporters: But we wanted a crime! Are you sure?? Look again!
Barr: Sorry, not there.
Reporters: Can we ask Mueller directly? Will he testify before us??
Barr: Sure.
Reporters: We think you are trying to protect the President!
Barr: WTF is wrong with you?
Reporters: We don't believe you!
Barr: Oh well.
Outstanding synopsis. Spot on
The Five will be "must see TV" this afternoon. My luck though, they will have Donna Brazile on the panel because Juan's head will have exploded.It will be interesting to see how fake news CNN spins this.
Democrats: Mueller is fair! He will find crimes by this President!
Mueller: No collusion. No obstruction.
Democrats: We hate you, you partisan hack!
It will be interesting to see how fake news CNN spins this.
Democrats: Mueller is fair! He will find crimes by this President!
Mueller: No collusion. No obstruction.
Democrats: We hate you, you partisan hack!
I’ll wait to read it myself. Barr’s explanation of the ‘no obstrustion’ Still sounds an awful lot like the ‘no intent’ decision. The only difference is who made the announcement
Spitbubble is working hard on her rationalizations!
Spitbubble hasn't read the report. (Spitbubble, likely will never read the report...like most on here)
Life must be so easy when you do nothing but sit back and let other tell you what to think.
What digging. Barr clearly said Mueller identified 10 discrete instances where trump may have committed obstruction. He also said he didn’t see any criminal intent.Keep digging. Keep your hopes alive my friend.
"Intent" is a requirement for there to be obstruction, legally speaking.What digging. Barr clearly said Mueller identified 10 discrete instances where trump may have committed obstruction. He also said he didn’t see any criminal intent.
I’d like to read it for myself and decide. Are you just going to accept the AGs word for it?