Only 1 percent military raise for January?

nhboy

Ubi bene ibi patria
Link to original article.

"In the midst of discussion about launching a U.S. military strike on Syria, President Obama moved Friday to reduce the size of January’s military raise.

Instead of the 1.8 percent raise due troops under a federal pay formula, Obama notified Congress he is exercising his powers as the government’s pay agent to cap the Jan. 1 increase at 1 percent.

The announcement came at 5 p.m. at the start of the Labor Day weekend after the news had been dominated for days about how the U.S. should respond to apparent use of chemical weapons against civilians by the government of Syria.

The pay decision is not unexpected and is not final, but it may diminish some support for a bigger military raise.

Obama’s 2014 defense budget sent to Congress in February included a 1 percent pay increase, a recommendation endorsed by the Senate Armed Services Committee but opposed by the House of Representatives. The defense authorization and appropriations bills approved by the House include the 1.8 percent across-the-board raise, the amount called for under the Federal Pay Comparability Act requiring raises to keep pace with private-sector wages.

Congress could override Obama’s pay order in whatever final defense legislation is passed for the year. However, doing so requires finding $580 million in 2014 and $3.5 billion over five years to make up the difference between the 1 percent and 1.8 percent raises. "
 

MMM_donuts

New Member
True but, I HAVE seen many service members in line for federal aid (WIC, Food Stamps, etc.)

Having been in the military, I do not understand how this is possible through no fault of the individual service member.

If someone is willing to try, I would really appreciate an explanation of how this is possible because I hear it brought up often.
 

stgislander

Well-Known Member
PREMO Member
Having been in the military, I do not understand how this is possible through no fault of the individual service member.

If someone is willing to try, I would really appreciate an explanation of how this is possible because I hear it brought up often.

In my experience from the 80's, it was almost always an E-3 or 4 with a unemployed spouse and two or more kids.
 

dave1959

Active Member
They should be happy with anything at all. Private sector rarely gets a cost of living raise.
 

CrashTest

Well-Known Member
When the former Mrs Crash was an E3 back in 2001, she was making comparible to $36,000 a year when you count housing allowance, etc. About 2.5 times as much as someone her age working at Walmart and more than an entry level County Sheriff at the time.
 

MarieB

New Member
When the former Mrs Crash was an E3 back in 2001, she was making comparible to $36,000 a year when you count housing allowance, etc. About 2.5 times as much as someone her age working at Walmart and more than an entry level County Sheriff at the time.

Is housing allowance taxable?
 

SG_Player1974

New Member
Bottom line is that the "Cost of Living" is definitely NOT going up by only 1%

It is usually a steady 3-3.5%. Now multiply that by the number of years that this has been going on.

The rest is just basic math. :coffee:
 

b23hqb

Well-Known Member
PREMO Member
After taxes, a 1% payraise might buy you a case of beer. :buddies:

A case of beer a month for the year, minimum, with money left over......

Moral: Don't drink beer, and get promoted so it goes farther,

And vote the big o and his minions out of office.
 
Top