D
DysonFamily
Guest
NATIONAL ADVISORY: ORGANIZED CRIME OPERATING IN THE CHILD PROTECTION SERVICES
I know this is a long post, but if you read nothing else see this page:
http://www.thesociologycenter.com/slavetrade.html
It details the congressional hearings and the evidence that has been sent to The Sociology Center, which does not include that already sent to the state and federal legislatures. Maryland's turn is coming sooooooon... Ehrlich's already been caught in one DSS crime. It's time for all of the rest of the SENATORS and congressmen in on this FEDERAL FRAUD to start sweating the investigations... More on these crimes IN MARYLAND will specifically be reported to you soon.
Those who care about children, or at least about what their hard earned tax dollars have been paying for, will continue to read. Those who care to learn that the true terrorism is being perpetrated by their own government officials upon their OWN FAMILIES and their OWN neighbors, will also continue to read. Pass this around to everyone you know who has had trouble with Calvert County DSS, specifically, Doreen McKenzie and Gary Anderson. It's time those two went shopping for something in ORANGE. Maybe Martha can help them out.
Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2004 23:20:40 -0700
From: James R Brown
You may use this to make handouts, post it on your web site and link to my Child Slave Trade page.
Attached is the new version which now includes a catalogue of criminal acts committed by those operating the national child protection system. It also identifies two specific administrative steps that can be taken at the State level to begin prosecuting the criminals, establish an organized crime task force specifically to investigate and prosecute interlinked organized crime across the child protection, mental health, and social work systems. Another step is to use State insurance fraud investigators to go after science fraud-based mental health and social work service provider insurance claims.
These are also politically attainable goals for State CPS critics and activists.
James Roger Brown
thesociologist@earthlink.net;
http://www.thesociologycenter.net
NATIONAL ADVISORY ORGANIZED CRIME OPERATING IN THE CHILD PROTECTION SYSTEM
June 29, 2004 Release
This release supercedes all previous dated and undated releases.
by James Roger Brown
Director THE SOCIOLOGY CENTER
www.thesociologycenter.com;
thesociologist@earthlink.net
Five-year-old Florida foster child Rilya Wilson was kidnapped from State custody in February 2001. Florida officials did not detect the kidnapping for fifteen months. The kidnapping went undetected for two reasons, Rilya Wilson was kidnapped by persons knowledgeable of the inner workings of the child protection system, and Florida Department of Children and Families case file record forms were falsified for fifteen months.
Case workers falsely reported Rilya Wilson was in Florida State custody and in good health.
The Rilya Wilson case is not an isolated incident. Falsification of child protection system records is part of a national pattern of organized crime. For one example, Employees of the Florida Department of Children and Families were also implicated in the kidnapping of an Arkansas child that involved falsification of records.
In a June 6, 2002, opinion, the Arkansas Supreme Court ruled that an infant Arkansas citizen had been illegally transferred to Florida State custody in what was essentially an interstate criminal conspiracy to seize and transport children in complete disregard of State and Federal law. (See Arkansas Department of Human Services v. Cox, Supreme Court of Arkansas No. 01-1021, 349ark, issue 3, sc 9, 6 June 2002 http://courts.state.ar.us/opinions/2002a/20020606/01-1021.wpd)
The Rilya Wilson case is merely the tip of a criminal iceberg. Beginning about 1973, criminal elements in the mental health and social work professions began cooperating to construct a nationwide organized criminal bureaucracy to exploit children and implement a shared political agenda behind the legislated secrecy of the child protection, juvenile justice, and mental health systems. (For details see EVIDENCE BOOK SUBMITTED TO CONGRESS link on page 9.)
The current result is a nationwide organized criminal operation integrated across the child protection, mental health and social work systems that uses everything from sophisticated science fraud-based "evaluation" instruments structured to produce false positives (see EVIDENCE BOOK) to third-party State service contracts written to sustain a system of structural corruption in which State employees and contract service providers must falsify records and testimony or they will not continue to be employed or paid.
To maintain their existence, organized criminal operations such as these are no different from other bureaucracies that must construct policies, methods, and procedures necessary to sustain daily operations. The only special adaptation required to run criminal operations in government and quasi-government agencies is that organized crime bureaucracy policies, methods, and procedures must be integrated into the policies, methods and procedures of the umbrella agency or program and not be detected as criminal processes.
The existence of organized crime in the child protection system in any given State is not that difficult to detect. Prominent among the indicators (see EVIDENCE BOOK) are:
1. Systematic, consistent falsification of child protection agency records and testimony, contract mental health evaluations and testimony, and social work intervention records and testimony;
2. The annual number of "founded" child abuse allegations can be predicted from the number of conditional federal grant and reimbursement salary fund dollars needed to balance the State child protection agency payroll (the number of children taken into State custody each year will be the number sufficient to generate the federal fund claims necessary to balance the agency payroll); and
3. Third-party contracts to file State child protection agency federal fund claims will contain provisions that only compensate the contractor for increases in federal funds paid to the State over and above the amount paid in the previous contract for such claim filing services.
Inserting a contract provision that links a federal fund claims contractor's compensation to increasing annual federal fund dollars generated over the previous contract period is a classic example of structural corruption. If the contractor fails to increase paid federal fund claims for a specified time period (usually
quarterly), their contract can be cancelled.
The end result is a system in which everyone stays employed only if the annual number of founded child abuse cases always increases and never decreases, or annual paid federal fund claims increases and never decreases.
An important by product of this criminal process for
exploiting children, independent of the true child abuse rate, is the blind political support for the criminal operations generated by the constant flow of conditional federal funds into the respective State's economy.
In the Rilya Wilson case, even the Foster Mother continued to receive and accept payments for the care of Rilya over a year after the child disappeared. Caseworkers reportedly told her to take the money.
An ironic twist is that this corrupt modern child slave trade system is another example of history repeating itself. A criminal bureaucracy previously developed and operated in the Swiss social welfare system from about 1850 to 1950 under the same pretext of protecting children from alleged inadequacies of their parents.
The Swiss Verdingkinder system is described in Peter Neumann's documentary film "Verdingkinder" and Marco Leuenberger's Thesis, "Verdingkinder. Geschichte der armenrechtlichen Kinderfürsorge im Kanton Bern 1847-1945, 211 S., 1991." (An internet search using the term "Verdingkinder" will produce links to some English language articles.)
The Swiss "Verdingkinder" and United States child slave trade systems have the following social processes in common:
1. Poor families are required to register with the Government. (US Public Assistance, Welfare, Medicaid, Medicare and numerous other special programs.)
2. Once registered with the Government, Parents are subjected to ongoing monitoring to determine if "the best interest of the child" is served by removing the child from the home and placing the child in State "protective" custody.
3. Children who age out of the system are not intellectually and emotionally prepared for adult life, especially marital relationships.
4. Decisions about the "best interest of the child" are made by Government employees using vague subjective criteria and State or personal economic interest.
[ Continued Below ]
I know this is a long post, but if you read nothing else see this page:
http://www.thesociologycenter.com/slavetrade.html
It details the congressional hearings and the evidence that has been sent to The Sociology Center, which does not include that already sent to the state and federal legislatures. Maryland's turn is coming sooooooon... Ehrlich's already been caught in one DSS crime. It's time for all of the rest of the SENATORS and congressmen in on this FEDERAL FRAUD to start sweating the investigations... More on these crimes IN MARYLAND will specifically be reported to you soon.
Those who care about children, or at least about what their hard earned tax dollars have been paying for, will continue to read. Those who care to learn that the true terrorism is being perpetrated by their own government officials upon their OWN FAMILIES and their OWN neighbors, will also continue to read. Pass this around to everyone you know who has had trouble with Calvert County DSS, specifically, Doreen McKenzie and Gary Anderson. It's time those two went shopping for something in ORANGE. Maybe Martha can help them out.
Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2004 23:20:40 -0700
From: James R Brown
You may use this to make handouts, post it on your web site and link to my Child Slave Trade page.
Attached is the new version which now includes a catalogue of criminal acts committed by those operating the national child protection system. It also identifies two specific administrative steps that can be taken at the State level to begin prosecuting the criminals, establish an organized crime task force specifically to investigate and prosecute interlinked organized crime across the child protection, mental health, and social work systems. Another step is to use State insurance fraud investigators to go after science fraud-based mental health and social work service provider insurance claims.
These are also politically attainable goals for State CPS critics and activists.
James Roger Brown
thesociologist@earthlink.net;
http://www.thesociologycenter.net
NATIONAL ADVISORY ORGANIZED CRIME OPERATING IN THE CHILD PROTECTION SYSTEM
June 29, 2004 Release
This release supercedes all previous dated and undated releases.
by James Roger Brown
Director THE SOCIOLOGY CENTER
www.thesociologycenter.com;
thesociologist@earthlink.net
Five-year-old Florida foster child Rilya Wilson was kidnapped from State custody in February 2001. Florida officials did not detect the kidnapping for fifteen months. The kidnapping went undetected for two reasons, Rilya Wilson was kidnapped by persons knowledgeable of the inner workings of the child protection system, and Florida Department of Children and Families case file record forms were falsified for fifteen months.
Case workers falsely reported Rilya Wilson was in Florida State custody and in good health.
The Rilya Wilson case is not an isolated incident. Falsification of child protection system records is part of a national pattern of organized crime. For one example, Employees of the Florida Department of Children and Families were also implicated in the kidnapping of an Arkansas child that involved falsification of records.
In a June 6, 2002, opinion, the Arkansas Supreme Court ruled that an infant Arkansas citizen had been illegally transferred to Florida State custody in what was essentially an interstate criminal conspiracy to seize and transport children in complete disregard of State and Federal law. (See Arkansas Department of Human Services v. Cox, Supreme Court of Arkansas No. 01-1021, 349ark, issue 3, sc 9, 6 June 2002 http://courts.state.ar.us/opinions/2002a/20020606/01-1021.wpd)
The Rilya Wilson case is merely the tip of a criminal iceberg. Beginning about 1973, criminal elements in the mental health and social work professions began cooperating to construct a nationwide organized criminal bureaucracy to exploit children and implement a shared political agenda behind the legislated secrecy of the child protection, juvenile justice, and mental health systems. (For details see EVIDENCE BOOK SUBMITTED TO CONGRESS link on page 9.)
The current result is a nationwide organized criminal operation integrated across the child protection, mental health and social work systems that uses everything from sophisticated science fraud-based "evaluation" instruments structured to produce false positives (see EVIDENCE BOOK) to third-party State service contracts written to sustain a system of structural corruption in which State employees and contract service providers must falsify records and testimony or they will not continue to be employed or paid.
To maintain their existence, organized criminal operations such as these are no different from other bureaucracies that must construct policies, methods, and procedures necessary to sustain daily operations. The only special adaptation required to run criminal operations in government and quasi-government agencies is that organized crime bureaucracy policies, methods, and procedures must be integrated into the policies, methods and procedures of the umbrella agency or program and not be detected as criminal processes.
The existence of organized crime in the child protection system in any given State is not that difficult to detect. Prominent among the indicators (see EVIDENCE BOOK) are:
1. Systematic, consistent falsification of child protection agency records and testimony, contract mental health evaluations and testimony, and social work intervention records and testimony;
2. The annual number of "founded" child abuse allegations can be predicted from the number of conditional federal grant and reimbursement salary fund dollars needed to balance the State child protection agency payroll (the number of children taken into State custody each year will be the number sufficient to generate the federal fund claims necessary to balance the agency payroll); and
3. Third-party contracts to file State child protection agency federal fund claims will contain provisions that only compensate the contractor for increases in federal funds paid to the State over and above the amount paid in the previous contract for such claim filing services.
Inserting a contract provision that links a federal fund claims contractor's compensation to increasing annual federal fund dollars generated over the previous contract period is a classic example of structural corruption. If the contractor fails to increase paid federal fund claims for a specified time period (usually
quarterly), their contract can be cancelled.
The end result is a system in which everyone stays employed only if the annual number of founded child abuse cases always increases and never decreases, or annual paid federal fund claims increases and never decreases.
An important by product of this criminal process for
exploiting children, independent of the true child abuse rate, is the blind political support for the criminal operations generated by the constant flow of conditional federal funds into the respective State's economy.
In the Rilya Wilson case, even the Foster Mother continued to receive and accept payments for the care of Rilya over a year after the child disappeared. Caseworkers reportedly told her to take the money.
An ironic twist is that this corrupt modern child slave trade system is another example of history repeating itself. A criminal bureaucracy previously developed and operated in the Swiss social welfare system from about 1850 to 1950 under the same pretext of protecting children from alleged inadequacies of their parents.
The Swiss Verdingkinder system is described in Peter Neumann's documentary film "Verdingkinder" and Marco Leuenberger's Thesis, "Verdingkinder. Geschichte der armenrechtlichen Kinderfürsorge im Kanton Bern 1847-1945, 211 S., 1991." (An internet search using the term "Verdingkinder" will produce links to some English language articles.)
The Swiss "Verdingkinder" and United States child slave trade systems have the following social processes in common:
1. Poor families are required to register with the Government. (US Public Assistance, Welfare, Medicaid, Medicare and numerous other special programs.)
2. Once registered with the Government, Parents are subjected to ongoing monitoring to determine if "the best interest of the child" is served by removing the child from the home and placing the child in State "protective" custody.
3. Children who age out of the system are not intellectually and emotionally prepared for adult life, especially marital relationships.
4. Decisions about the "best interest of the child" are made by Government employees using vague subjective criteria and State or personal economic interest.
[ Continued Below ]
Last edited by a moderator: