Midnightrider
Well-Known Member
You better get to destroying, I bought my first in the early eightiesI will destroy any that I might own the day you actually buy a firearm.
You better get to destroying, I bought my first in the early eightiesI will destroy any that I might own the day you actually buy a firearm.
The people of the time obviously didn’t see the NFA as any more of an infringement than you find the bumpstock ban. It was a nothing burger just like this.Not pickin' a nit, just pointing out your error. As to infringement, I believe that I have been more than clear on this, but I will again repeat it for you. Due to the true infringement against the 2ndA, which are the NFA and GCA, this is a nothing burger as no additional firearms are being banned.
You better get to destroying, I bought my first in the early eighties
Infringment,,, No Big Deal,,LOL... You live in a state that has banned the transfer of over 80 firearms.The people of the time obviously didn’t see the NFA as any more of an infringement than you find the bumpstock ban. It was a nothing burger just like this.
Just don’t pretend to be pro 2ndA if you think this infringement is no big deal.
Bet you cannot find a single thread anywhere
Pretend? That is rich coming from you. You pretend that an ancillary device added to a semi-automatic weapon is a weapon in and of itself. It isn't. And it isn't an infringement when it isn't a weapon being banned.The people of the time obviously didn’t see the NFA as any more of an infringement than you find the bumpstock ban. It was a nothing burger just like this.
Just don’t pretend to be pro 2ndA if you think this infringement is no big deal.