Ponytail
New Member
As it was just decribed to me, and not because I'm an offender, the law will be enforced using the following criteria supposedly following MD state code:
"Any listening device visibly seen covering one or both ear openings is considered to be in violation of the law. As well, a cord seen coming from under the helmet indicating a listening device is being used under a helmet is also considered to be in violation."
Is this not totally friggin ridiculous? Don't get me wrong, I wanna see cell phone use while driving eliminated, but to use THAT as the criteria? Their argument is that you can not hear emergency vehicles and such if you have those things in your ear. Bullshiat! Those things inhibit hearing less than my co-workers ear hair.
Now even listening to an i-POD type of device while on your motorcycle is illegal.
This is going WAY to friggin far.
"Any listening device visibly seen covering one or both ear openings is considered to be in violation of the law. As well, a cord seen coming from under the helmet indicating a listening device is being used under a helmet is also considered to be in violation."
Is this not totally friggin ridiculous? Don't get me wrong, I wanna see cell phone use while driving eliminated, but to use THAT as the criteria? Their argument is that you can not hear emergency vehicles and such if you have those things in your ear. Bullshiat! Those things inhibit hearing less than my co-workers ear hair.
Now even listening to an i-POD type of device while on your motorcycle is illegal.
This is going WAY to friggin far.