He spent $250,000 of taxpayer money for a PR stunt at the direction of his boss while he was on the clock and being paid.
So, $250,000 is based on an assumption of worst-case costs for the plane by a Toronto reporter. This assumption does not take into account that the VP was pretty likely to travel either way, and therefore is a bad assumption.
The "PR stunt" is an opinion, not supportable by facts.
The "at the direction of his boss" is an assumption based on Trump's tweet that came AFTER the VP left. Mind you, if this was any other situation, no one would believe that Trump was involved beforehand and was merely taking credit for something he had no involvement in. Hypocrite, much?
With respect to "on the clock and being paid", the VP is a salaried employee and is technically on the clock 24/7/365.25. It is a meaningless phrase for a person of his status.
Therefore, virtually every phrase is the sentence is inaccurate, and assumption, an opinion, or meaningless. Good job, Sap!
Him And the president should be focused on
The rise of white nationalism
What "rise" is this? Source (note: anecdotes are not a "source")
The fires on the west coast
What about the fires elsewhere? Should he, as the federal government's chief executive, be involved in the fires in Montana? How about the Burger King fire in Charlottesville? Where do we draw the line on what is federal government's responsibility vs. state responsibility, in your view?
The hurricane damage in Texas and Florida and Puerto Rico
What's not being done?
Deescalating tensions with N Korea.
The last president who worked on deescalation with North Korea did so by giving him nuclear power plants, thus creating North Korea as a nuclear weapons capable nation. Thanks, Slick Willie!! Perhaps deescalation is not the right policy.
And whatvstarted this whole thing excessive force by a few of our nations police.
Is that the job of the federal government? If so, what in the Constitution gives the federal government control over local police forces?
And, is there a problem with excessive force? Can you show me trends over time from a peer-reviewed academic study that shows what you see as a problem actually exists?
That is what real leaders would be doing.
I know you found President Obama to be a "real leader". I also know that virtually any anecdote you've offered happened during or before President Obama's administration. Can you tell me what that "real leader" did that Trump stopped, or that Trump should be emulating? What did President Obama do to help the situation you say exists?