Police subject women to roadside cavity searches

[Misfit]

http://rt.com/usa/news/texas-women-roadside-cavity-422/

Two Texan women have filed a lawsuit for being subjected to embarrassing ‘roadside body cavity searches’ by state troopers who searched their genital regions.

The women were stopped by a trooper for throwing a cigarette butt out of their car window, which is prohibited under the Texas Health & Safety Code that outlaws littering. Angel Dobbs, 38, and her niece Ashley Dobbs, 24, were stopped by a trooper on State Highway 161 and forced to exit their vehicles. Trooper David Farrell then began to question the women about marijuana, proceeding to search the car and then calling his female colleague Kelley Helleson to the scene to search the women’s bodies.

 

[MMM_donuts]

The video shows Helleson using her fingers to search the anuses and vaginas of the women. The trooper used the same latex glove to touch the genitals of both women, while conducting the search on the side of the road in full view of the passing vehicles.

 

[Misfit]

 

[MadDogMarine]

Cop was probably a former TSA agent putting her training "into" good use.

 

[Kris10]

that can't be legal.......can it??

 

[Chris0nllyn]

Paging "itsrequired"...

Maybe you could tell us all how this story is bs, and the cops did everything by the book?

 

[bcp]

What I think is going on is that law enforcement is under orders to start doing this type of thing to get people used to the idea of total government control.

I bet if they were black women, the turd chunk in the whitehouse would have already made comments about if that was his wife.
(of course if it was his wife I think it would have requried a Veterinarian to do the search.)

 

[itsrequired]

Paging "itsrequired"...

Maybe you could tell us all how this story is bs, and the cops did everything by the book?

Why would I defend this? It is clearly inappropriate for the officer to search someone who is not under arrest in that manner. Unlike you, I can tell when police are doing something wrong and be objective about their actions.

 

[Gilligan]

:kicksrock: utscopcostumeupforsaleoncraiglist:

 

[Chris0nllyn]

Why would I defend this? It is clearly inappropriate for the officer to search someone who is not under arrest in that manner. Unlike you, I can tell when police are doing something wrong and be objective about their actions.

Remember the officer who shot the dog? He was in the right, according to you.

 

[dontknowwhy]

Remember the officer who shot the dog? He was in the right, according to you.

the yorkie, the blak lab, the bay retriever, the chihuahua, or the pitbull?

which one? there have been so many...

 

[itsrequired]

Remember the officer who shot the dog? He was in the right, according to you.

Police work is inherently dangerous. Dogs are shot many times by police. If you want me to remember each time you have falsely accused police officers of doing something wrong, I can’t. You have cried wolf far too many times.

 

[gary_webb]

This is surreal. If the cop was so positive they had drugs he should have placed them under arrest and had this done at the police station. There is no excuse for this, these supposed 'officers' are guilty of sexual assault at minimum.

 

[Chris0nllyn]

Police work is inherently dangerous. Dogs are shot many times by police. If you want me to remember each time you have falsely accused police officers of doing something wrong, I can’t. You have cried wolf far too many times.

It seems "doing wrong" is very different in the eyes of the public, and the police....some times.

http://forums.somd.com/news-current-events/260856-another-dog-shot-police.html

 

[itsrequired]

It seems "doing wrong" is very different in the eyes of the public, and the police....some times.

http://forums.somd.com/news-current-events/260856-another-dog-shot-police.html

As I stated, you have falsely accused the police of several things.

 

[Chris0nllyn]

As I stated, you have falsely accused the police of several things.

Oh, that cop seen shooting the dog on video must have not been a cop.

My apologies.

 

[Tech]

Throwing a butt out the window? Can we get these cops to Chancellors Run & 235?

 

[itsrequired]

Oh, that cop seen shooting the dog on video must have not been a cop.

My apologies.

No...he's a cop. Just because you and a couple other people on here disagree with the way he handled a situation doesn't make it wrong.

 

[Chris0nllyn]

No...he's a cop. Just because you and a couple other people on here disagree with the way he handled a situation doesn't make it wrong.

What makes it right?

Because his fellow officers, or some internal review said it was?

 

[itsrequired]

What makes it right?

Because his fellow officers, or some internal review said it was?

What makes it wrong? Because you or someone else who wasn't in the position of the officer said so?