Politics of Covid 19 Vaccines

GURPS

INGSOC
PREMO Member

VAIDS (Vaccine Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome) Crisis Imminent: in this case COVID vaccine related


Good review by Igor, good reporting:

‘My nurse tipster has been employed at the Nicklaus Children’s Hospital in Miami for a decade, and emailed yours truly the following:

I’ve been working at a Miami children’s hospital for 10 years and we are now going back to doubling rooms because there is no space for the patients.
Admission numbers are astronomical. We are now doubling rooms which was eliminated prior to covid, and this would have been considered unheard of after covid.
Every sort of disease and ailment is on the rise. Symptomatic covid is barely a blip, as it does nothing to children other than mild cold/flu symptoms.
Staffing is always short and new hires are nurses straight out of nursing school with no desire to work this hard and with a serious culture shock.
We are stretched super thin and holes are being filled by inexperienced staff when they are even available.
Upper respiratory infections are common now along with reoccurring chronic conditions. Saw two teenage patients recently with vasculitis.
None of this is normal. I have never seen these kinds of admissions like this especially during early fall. Based on the trends I am seeing I think what you have been writing is right and things will get a lot worse all because of the vaccine.
 

GURPS

INGSOC
PREMO Member
💉 Last month, the Atlantic ran a story headlined, “Did a Famous Doctor’s Covid Shot Make His Cancer Worse?” The sub-headline explains, “A lifelong promoter of vaccines suspects he might be the rare, unfortunate exception.”

Almost exactly one year prior to the article’s publication, Belgian immunologist Michael Goldman, 67, one of Europe’s best-known champions of medical research, rolled up his sleeve at a clinic and gratefully received his covid booster.

He was grateful because he’d just been diagnosed with an early case of lymphoma, a cancer of the immune system. Because Goldman knew he’d have to take immune-suppressing drugs as part of his cancer treatment, he wanted to get his booster fast, while there was still time for it to have an effect.

But after the jab, he quickly started feeling even worse, and more worrisome, his lymph nodes were swelling fast. Three weeks later, he went back to see his cancer doctor (coincidentally, his brother), and both men were astounded that the new scans showed “a brand-new barrage of cancer lesions—so many spots that it looked like someone had set off fireworks inside Michel’s body” — especially in his right armpit and along the right side of his body.

Oddly, the same side where he’d got his third covid shot.

Goldman immediately suspected the vaccine, but he wasn’t sure. He used to run an institute for vaccine-technology research, and he’s been interviewed many times about covid, reassuring the public of the safety of the jabs, and the safety of mRNA vaccines in particular. In December 2020, he told an interviewer that “if there was a real problem with the technology, we’d have seen it before now for sure.”

For SURE.

As he began and continued his cancer treatment, Goldman also was researching HOW there might be a link between the jab and his surging cancer. He finally found a theory, and in November, 2021 published a study titled “Rapid Progression of Angioimmunoblastic T Cell Lymphoma Following BNT162b2 mRNA Vaccine Booster Shot.”

The Atlantic article spends most of its energy emphasizing how Goldman struggled over whether to admit that his cancer got worse because of his jab, and the reporter stressed over and over how rare his syndrome was. The article’s author even puts herself in the story, describing her own struggle over whether to write the piece in the first place, because of her fear that anti-vaxxers would abuse the story.

His cancer is now back under control. These days, according to the Atlantic, Goldman often contemplates the possible connection between his lymphoma flare-up and his covid vaccination. “If it exists, it must be very rare,” he said. But he doesn’t regret going public with his case, saying, “I’m still convinced it was the right thing to do.”

But Goldman admits he’s struggling over whether to take the fourth shot. “I don’t know what I will do,” he told the reporter.

Well. I know what I would do. But Goldman’s an expert, and so he’s baffled.




 

GURPS

INGSOC
PREMO Member
What is Gene Therapy


Human gene therapy seeks to modify or manipulate the expression of a gene or to alter the biological properties of living cells for therapeutic use 1.


Nayerossadat et al.: "Viral and nonviral delivery systems for gene delivery"; whenever you hear someone arguing that COVID injections are vaccines, show them this study and what defines 'gene therapy'


SOURCE:

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3507026/



https%3A%2F%2Fbucketeer-e05bbc84-baa3-437e-9518-adb32be77984.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2Fb9881f87-50c4-4e49-b484-9fae357a3c0d_1920x1020.png
 

GURPS

INGSOC
PREMO Member

One in Every 500 Small Children Who Receive the Pfizer Vaccine are Hospitalised By It, Study Finds



One in every 500 children under five years who received the Pfizer mRNA Covid vaccine were hospitalised with a vaccine injury, and one in 200 had symptoms ongoing for weeks or months afterwards, a study has found.

The study published in JAMA included 7,806 children aged five or younger who were followed up of for an average of 91.4 days following their first Pfizer vaccination. It was a retrospective cohort study done as an authenticated online survey (response rate 41.1%) in spring 2022 which included parents or caregivers who registered children for SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in outpatient care facilities in Germany. It compared the adverse events to those of the same children with other vaccinations in order to control for over-reporting.

It concluded that the symptoms reported after Pfizer vaccination were “comparable overall” to those for other vaccines. Let’s see.

  • Any symptoms: 62% higher
  • Musculoskeletal (muscles and bones) symptoms: 155% higher
  • Dermatologic (skin) symptoms: 118% higher
  • Otolaryngologic (ears, nose and throat) symptoms: 537% higher
  • Cardiovascular (heart etc.): 36% higher
  • Gastrointestinal (stomach etc.): 54% higher
 

GURPS

INGSOC
PREMO Member

Vaccines Never Prevented the Transmission of COVID




By now, many studies have shown that some of the once-censored concerns of “vaccine hesitant” people actually had validity. Facebook explicitly prohibited the claim that breast milk from vaccinated women could be harmful, but now a recent study has found that mRNA was present in breast milk, and the study urged caution when breastfeeding shortly after vaccination. The CDC previously told breastfeeding mothers that getting vaccinated was likely to benefit their babies, and many pregnant women were mandated to get vaccinated even though this population had been excluded from the vaccine trials.

A claim on Facebook or Twitter like “children who have had COVID should not get vaccinated” could also be subject to censorship, but new data suggests that young children who were previously infected might not see long-term benefits from vaccination. A study in the New England Journal of Medicine now shows that children ages 5-11 who had a prior infection but were not vaccinated had a lower risk of being reinfected than children who had a prior infection and did get vaccinated. After five months, protection against reinfection for the vaccinated children was negative.

Concealing important data and censoring the debate helped create an illusion of consensus and, as people were removed from social media platforms, erased the record of disagreement and skepticism.
Open discussion of conditions like myocarditis and pericarditis or cardiac deaths was also penalized despite 2021 data from Israel that confirmed elevated rates of myocarditis linked to vaccination. A later Israeli study from May 2022 found that cardiac arrest among people under 40 increased by 25% during the vaccine rollout. In the United States, the CDC was supposed to make its “v-safe” safety data public by Sept. 30. The CDC failed to do so but was forced to reveal this data through a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit. Of 10 million people in the “v-safe” program, 25% had a vaccine side effect that caused them to miss school or work and 7.7% had to seek medical care. Should Americans only be hearing about this kind of safety data now, or should it have been available before vaccine mandates were put in place?

[clip]

In the case of COVID, while claiming that it was the dissenters who caused harm, it was in fact the censors and enforcers of speech restrictions who caused immense damage to the social fabric and to the lives of individuals. The excuse that medical segregation was once necessary but is no longer necessary because “the facts changed” or “the science changed” is demonstrably false. The facts didn’t change. They were just banned.
 

GURPS

INGSOC
PREMO Member

Fact Checkers Come for Tucker Carlson Over Kid Vax Mandate Claim








“The CDC sets the standard and then it becomes required across the country,” Carlson said. On Thursday, the fact-checkers came out in force to dispute that, with the Associated Press, the Washington Post, ABC News, Politico, and many others arguing that Carlson is peddling misinformation. From the AP:

CLAIM: If the CDC adds the COVID-19 vaccine to the immunization schedule for children, the shots will be mandatory to attend school.
THE FACTS: The false claim gained momentum after it was shared by Fox News host Tucker Carlson this week.

The AP continued, reporting that CDC wrote in an email that the agency “only makes recommendations for use of vaccines, while school-entry vaccination requirements are determined by state or local jurisdictions.”

Carlson had asserted that “more than a dozen states follow the CDC’s immunization schedule to set vaccination requirements—not suggestions, requirements—for children to be educated.” Fact-checkers countered that Virginia and Massachusetts, two states which Carlson referred to, do not require the annual flu vaccine in order to attend school—even though the vaccine appears on the CDC’s schedule.

Dr. William Schaffner, a vaccine policy expert and professor at Vanderbilt University Medical Center (which is currently under fire for its transgender surgeries on minors), said he did not know of any states that automatically require all vaccines as a requirement to go to school. “Those are recommendations that go to pediatricians and family doctors as they care for children,” Schaffner said. “They’re just recommendations, there are no automatic mandates that follow.”

Other articles across the mainstream media cheered on the CDC, and were similarly agitated that anybody would dare to call this a “mandate.”

My question is, if the new guidance is so unimportant, why did the CDC bother issuing it? We’re really supposed to believe that this will have no effect? Of course it will. Blue state governors like California’s Gavin Newsom and Illinois’ J.B. Pritzker are certainly reading the new vax schedule, and you can bet they’ll be in a hurry to use it to impose state-wide mandates. Parents don’t want their kids getting jabbed, though: just look at the 9 percent vaccination rate in kids up to age 5.








 

GURPS

INGSOC
PREMO Member

GOP governors push back as CDC adds COVID vax to immunization schedule despite data on risk to kids



Following a CDC panel's unanimous vote to add COVID-19 vaccines to the 2023 immunization schedule, several governors — including a centrist Democrat dubbed a potential "answer [to] Democrats' 2024 prayers" — are scrambling to assure their constituents that state requirements aren't changing.

The Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices' (ACIP) approval of 3-4 dose COVID shots for adults and children starting at 6 months — a first for vaccines still under emergency use authorization — stands in sharp relief to growing reluctance abroad to jab certain age groups and ongoing research documenting serious adverse events.

The political backlash reflects the general disinclination of American parents to inoculate their preteens against COVID.


 

herb749

Well-Known Member
I did see this morning that once the govt stops offering free shots Pfizer is going to sell them for 400% over what the govt paid. Not sure if insurance companies will pick up the tab.
 

GURPS

INGSOC
PREMO Member
💉 Uh-oh! The new bivalent boosters are working SO very well that even CDC Director Rochelle Walensky, if that is her real name, is now covid-infected and symptomatic, a mere 30 days after getting her new and improved bivalent covid shot.

Here she is back on September 22:







And now, a month later on October 22:

https://twitter.com/disclosetv/status/1583858733733777411?s=20&t=TXHUCNtvOxkckb-Oe-Ppig





According to media reports, Director Walensky is “experiencing mild symptoms.” Fortunately Pfizer has ANOTHER drug for her to take, Paxlovid, which she’d better start taking asap. Allegedly, last month’s shot was Walensky’s FIFTH safe and effective injection. Don’t mock. It could have been SO much worse. And, they never said it would stop infections.

You remember that not happening, right?







The quintuple-jabbed CDC Director will be staying at home this week so as not to infect her jabbed co-workers, since the fully-vaccinated CDC staff remains at risk of dying from covid. Safety first.

Pfizer’s eight mice ‘volunteers’ couldn’t be reached for comment, because immediately after the trials, they were executed, burned to ashes, and their ashes were sealed up in eight tiny lead coffins that were promptly chucked overboard into the Marianas Trench.






 

GURPS

INGSOC
PREMO Member
💉 So, you won’t be surprised to hear that the none of the currently trending covid variants ones that the ‘bivalent’ booster shots elicit antibodies for. That’s the speed of science for you.

A few days ago, covid statistics miner Ethical Skeptic reported that the two new variants producing the most interest lately, BQ.1 and BQ.1.1, appear to prefer RECENTLY jabbed people, if you can believe that. The data suggests jabbed people are +22% more likely to be infected with one of the new variants, while unjabbed folks are -4% likely to catch it.

https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch...f95-12eb-4a43-88c9-ec82c101b400_1380x1438.png

https%3A%2F%2Fbucketeer-e05bbc84-baa3-437e-9518-adb32be77984.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F7688df95-12eb-4a43-88c9-ec82c101b400_1380x1438.png



I’m starting to think that the reason corporate media stopped reporting the new variants is because they’re coming so fast now. It’s impossible to keep up with them in a normal news cycle.

This news is interesting because if the new variants are now preferring recently-jabbed folks, one wonders how it will affect the recommended booster interval? Could they go to weekly? Daily? They may need at-home injections.


 

TPD

the poor dad
This news is interesting because if the new variants are now preferring recently-jabbed folks, one wonders how it will affect the recommended booster interval? Could they go to weekly? Daily? They may need at-home injections.
LOL at home injections for the rona, just like insulin!
 

GURPS

INGSOC
PREMO Member

Court Orders New York City To Reinstate Unvaccinated Employees, Give Backpay



Justice Ralph Porzio ordered the city to reinstate all fired employees and grant them backpay, citing the fact that being vaccinated against COVID-19 does not stop an individual from catching or spreading the virus, and thus being vaccinated does not grant enough community-wide benefit to warrant a mandate. The health commissioner “acted beyond his authority” by issuing an indefinite vaccine mandate rather than a temporary one, according to the court.





“States of emergency are meant to be temporary,” the court said in its ruling. “The question presented is whether the health commissioner has the authority to enact a permanent condition of employment during a state of emergency.”

The court ultimately found that the commissioner did not have that right.
 

GURPS

INGSOC
PREMO Member

Sheriffs Are The Key To Resisting Unconstitutional Gun Control And COVID Mandates




A number of sheriffs in upstate New York are declaring that their officers will not prioritize or “aggressively enforce” the state’s recently enacted, highly restrictive gun control law. These elected sheriffs have concluded quite correctly that the state’s new law is at odds with both the Constitution of the United States and with the most recent U.S. Supreme Court decision that declared New York’s previous and long-standing gun control law – the Sullivan Act – unconstitutional.

The sheriffs’ actions have rekindled a recurring debate about the powers of the more than three thousand local sheriffs serving in every state except Alaska and Connecticut.

The United States has had elected sheriffs long before there was a “United States of America,” with the first one taking office in Virginia in 1652. Police departments, on the other hand, are a relatively new phenomenon. The first municipal police department not established until 1838 in Boston, Massachusetts.
 
Top