Awesome!
Also, his posts annoy people so much that they stalk him and rush to quote before he can delete it.
POLL: Ban Lance or Not?
- Thread starter David
- Start date
Also, his posts annoy people so much that they stalk him and rush to quote before he can delete it.
aps45819
24/7 Single Dad
Mornin, these posts will remain here mayb & elsewhere 4eva. Just made it easier 2 add haters 2 an ignore list. TIA.) Have a Gr8 Day
Saved for Posterity and Privity 4eva
I voted to ban you
Not everyone knows how to operate a high-speed-telepathy cranial linking device like you do...
Dakota
~~~~~~~
I know.... so I think many really do like Lance.
Misfit
Lawful neutral
Lord of the flies. :shrug:
gemma_rae
Well-Known Member
don't OvrlOd the 4mz Sir!ty
dang
lovinmaryland
Well-Known Member
love that smileyI do not care!
Misfit
Lawful neutral
I wonder how many tissues Lance has used reading a whole thread about himself..
Why is he sensitive?
warneckutz
Well-Known Member
You know you messed up if TWL is voting against you...
warneckutz
Well-Known Member
So what if your plan backfires and you get your ass beat?
warneckutz
Well-Known Member
Violence never solves anything...
Hank
my war
awww...did your wittle internet feewings get hurt, tinkypoo?
I wonder how many tissues Lance has used reading a whole thread about himself..
Toxick
Splat
I'd like to see Lance fall down a well and decompose into an algae covered ball of squirming feces. However, I would only like to see this if it is of his own doing preferably while he's doing something stupid and Karma decides enough is enough.
That said, I am totally against banning someone just because they're a huge bag of used horse douche. If he's following the rules, it doesn't matter that he sucks wet ass.
I can deal with brainless asinine rejects from society in real life, I can deal with it here too.
That said, I am totally against banning someone just because they're a huge bag of used horse douche. If he's following the rules, it doesn't matter that he sucks wet ass.
I can deal with brainless asinine rejects from society in real life, I can deal with it here too.
Tilted
..
I wouldn't be in favor of him being banned just because he quickly deletes most posts or based on a generally annoying nature. I would, however, be in favor of him being banned because he routinely violates forum rules (e.g. threatening people, unabashed racism), if such is the case. I would hope that admins could read deleted posts so as to be able to determine for themselves whether he violates rules often enough to warrant being banned (or, obviously, whether they feel he sure be banned for whatever other reason they might have). I haven't read enough of his posts to have a definitive opinion myself, but my sense is that he's probably earned a banning.
That said, how effective can an IP-banning really be? I realize (or at least think) that vrai has to approve new screen names before they can start posting, but how hard would it be to get around an IP-banning and continually register new screen names? It shouldn't require more than a tiny bit of cleverness. While many fool's errands are likely to result in little more than an innocuous waste of effort, some are likely to exacerbate the problem they're meant to mitigate. My guess would be that a banning in this case would be more likely to exacerbate the perceived problem than to mitigate it.
That said, how effective can an IP-banning really be? I realize (or at least think) that vrai has to approve new screen names before they can start posting, but how hard would it be to get around an IP-banning and continually register new screen names? It shouldn't require more than a tiny bit of cleverness. While many fool's errands are likely to result in little more than an innocuous waste of effort, some are likely to exacerbate the problem they're meant to mitigate. My guess would be that a banning in this case would be more likely to exacerbate the perceived problem than to mitigate it.