The turbo cancer silence became tapping, which turned into drumbeats, which now sound like a roaring waterfall.
Just this morning, New Orleans local Fox 8 ran a story headlined, “
Oncologists alarmed as cancer cases rise among younger generations.”
By now,
they must know. But there remains an embargo against openly discussing the question of where turbo cancer came from, even with all the improvements in the speech climate since the bad old days, when you could get insta-canceled and slammed on the terrorist watchlist for just re-posting a Facebook meme connecting mRNA to cancer.
Let’s begin with these two remarkable sentences:
They’ll investigate every
other cause first. The first sentence above proved that Big Pharma is stronger than Big Food. Ultra-processed foods and seed oils are handy options for throwing under the bus. Maybe things would be different had Big Food, instead of Big Pharma, spent the last four years in close partnership with the federal government. Big Food might not be in line to get scapegoated.
The quote in the second sentence was attributed to Dr. Jonathan Mizrahi, a cancer doctor at a big Louisiana cancer center. Dr. Mizrahi observed with horror the flowering of young cancers
across all socioeconomic and demographic groups — so it’s got to be
something in the environment that’s happening to us.
By “young cancers,” Dr. Mizrahi explained he is seeing “more aggressive and advanced tumors in younger patients in their 20s to 40s.” More aggressive and advanced means
faster. (Turbo.) Dr. Mizrahi also said these new cancers are
different from cancers they’ve seen before. The new cancers don’t respond to normal treatment protocols.
“You’re throwing the best treatments you have at them and things aren’t working, and that is a very awful experience for our patients. It’s a humbling experience for us,” Mizrahi explained.
It would be one thing if a
specific type of cancer were on the rise. For instance, researchers in the 1940’s began linking lung cancer to asbestos exposure. Due to the traditionally slow, creeping, asymptomatic nature of cancer’s extended early stages, it was called
the silent killer. That’s why it took fifty years to connect a specific type of cancer, mesothelioma, to asbestos exposure.
But now, mesothelioma is considered a dead giveaway for asbestos-related injury, because that type of cancer was so historically uncommon, and because scientists could study the mechanism of disease, such as the embedded asbestos fibers in victims’ lung tissues.
Mesothelioma is a great example of what an environmental cancer
usually looks like. But what doctors are reporting now is nothing like any kind of normal, environmentally caused cancer outbreak. What we are seeing now, what Dr. Mizrahi diagnosed as “something happening
to us,” should terrify any
honest public health official.
The article delivered the bad news: “A recent American Cancer Society study highlights a troubling trend: 17 types of cancer are becoming more prevalent in younger generations, with death rates also rising.”
In other words, we have never seen anything like an environmental cancer disaster that increases
all types of cancers across
all demographics. A catastrophe of that scale would require a reagent reaching and damaging all types of cells, throughout the body. It would require a
new kind of environmental stimulant, something we’ve never before seen, which rules out ultra-processed foods and seed oils as the cause of
this disaster.
And if it
were the mRNA shots, we’d expect to see the populations most affected by these new cancers also being the ones most exposed to the shots through jab mandates. And that is exactly what we
are seeing, since college-aged and working-age folks —younger persons— were most likely to be jabbed, and most likely to be
repeatedly jabbed.
At this point, everyone knows. But the ‘experts’ are mute, baffled, useless. There’s not a bit of good news about the most ambitious vaccination scheme in human history. You’ve seen them, all the individual headlines, relentlessly trickling out. For example, the
Daily Mail, from two weeks ago:
The race is no longer a race to connect the jabs to the new epidemic of morbidity mortality. To the extent they are racing, the race is to
admit the connection.
Also last week, a French scientist published a preprint study in HAL Open Science, titled “
Confirmation of the Presence of Vaccine DNA in the Pfizer Anti-COVID-19 Vaccine. It became the fifth study to make the same findings. There are no studies going the other way.
In short, the paper described discovering unexpectedly high levels of
e. coli plasmid DNA and oncogenic SV40 promoter DNA —from a monkey virus— in the shots, neither of which should be there, and both of which provide sufficient potential ways to connect the mRNA shots to the young cancer epidemic. Not that any sane researcher who knows what’s good for them would touch this with a forty-foot stirring pipette.
The study helpfully cited the
four prior studies which got the same results: Speicher et al, 2023; McKernan et al, 2023; Konig and Kirchner, 2024; and Hughes, 2024. The new study expressed concern about the large amount of what it called “contaminant” DNA: “these results of huge quantities of plasmid DNA sequences per vaccine does notably raise issues regarding a putative risk of its integration in the human genome after its entry into cells.”
“Integration into the human genome” means that the cancer-causing
e. coli and SV40 genes could be incorporated into a person’s own DNA and passed to children, assuming they live long enough to have children. Horrifyingly, it would probably be better for the human race if they died faster, before they could have any kids.
Here’s the big problem. If the shots
are ever linked to the catastrophic cancer disaster Dr. Mizrahi described, the response would be politically and economically devastating. That news would probably collapse many governments and global health agencies. International companies would be destroyed, if not entire industries. Careers would be permanently ended for politicians, professors, scientists, journalists, and more.
The establishment will do everything it can to stop that from happening; and it will congratulate itself for preventing chaos while doing so. It will take relentless effort to bring accountability.
Trump swap Gaetz for Bondi and swap for judges; Tucker theory; turbo cancer picks up steam while experts resist; 5th contamination study; covid success; laugh and cry ads show conservative wins; more.
www.coffeeandcovid.com