Priest embezzles > $100K for his mom's cosmetic surgery

Monello

Smarter than the average bear
PREMO Member
No before & after pictures available.

An Italian priest is being investigated for embezzlement after squandering €100,000 which was intended for the poor on cars, holidays - and cosmetic treatments for his mother.
The generous sum came from a Paduan pharmacist who left €14 million to the Church when he died last year. The money was intended to go to the local branch of Caritas, a Catholic charity which offers humanitarian aid to the poor.
But when the priest, a 57-year-old who works in the village of Legnaro, was named custodian of the bequest, he ensured much of the money never made it to those in need, instead squandering it on personal luxuries.

what would Jesus do?
 

Gilligan

#*! boat!
PREMO Member
How can the average lay catholic stop it before it happens? There is not enough oversight or responsibility for the average Catholic because they obviously aren't allowed to do anything.

Unlike how much control you have over Osteen's millions and how he spends that..for example. Amirite?
 
C

Chuckt

Guest
Unlike how much control you have over Osteen's millions and how he spends that..for example. Amirite?

Dr. Walter Martin spoke out against Kenneth Copeland and he was off of channel 17 almost instantly. When you have radio power, a doctorate degree, the church and dedicated followers then you have authority and can do something like that.
Other people like me have a harder time because we don't have money, thousands of followers, many lawyers and many people willing to stick up for me.

Crime exists where people don't follow the Bible and when people don't have rules in place then others can do what they want.
 

TheLibertonian

New Member
The pope has begun cleaning out the catholic banking system quite thoroughly, but let me throw this out there.

A local mcdonalds manager embezzles money to pay for his own holiday.

Why aren't you talking about how mcdonalds is corrupt to the core and how the regular employees can't do anything? Or how about the McDonalds CEO should know how about every single managers personal accounts and finances.

And like the McDonalds, the catholic church has rules, and if you violate those rules and the central authority finds out they tend to land like a sack of bricks on top of you.

Also, not all priest take vows of poverty. It's a vow.

"I saw a preacher man in cuffs, he'd taken money from the church, he'd stuffed his bank account with righteous dollar bills. But even still I can't say much, because I know we're all the same, we all seek out to satisfy those thrills".
 

Monello

Smarter than the average bear
PREMO Member
the catholic church has rules, and if you violate those rules and the central authority finds out they tend to land like a sack of bricks on top of you.

Unless you are a pedophile, then the central authority just moves you to another church.
 

TheLibertonian

New Member
Which central authority? The pope? The pope didn't know.

It's hard to be objective, I know. But think. If you must hate, sharpen your hatred with facts, not stereotypes.

Indeed, catholic bishops in the U.S. and over the world did shuffle around pedophile priest in order to save the church face.

However, to go back to my McDonalds analogy, and yes I'm aware this isn't how McDonalds operates but I'm trying to make a point:

A McDonalds regional manager finds out that the manager of a local McDonalds is a pedophile. Obviously if this comes out it will be a major blow to the franchises image, and firing him isn't something that can be done without investigation, which would also be bad. So the regional manager decides to shuffle the local manager off.

Do you think it would be reasonable for the CEO of the corporation to know that a regional manager decided to move a local manager to a different store? Keeping in mind the regional manager is seperated by three degrees from the CEO.

To put it more bluntly, there are 240 bishops in the united states who oversee 194 dioceses. There are 45 arch bishops, and 13 cardinals in the U.S.

We don't KNOW how many priest there are in the United States.

I certainly think the guilty should be bought to justice under both secular and religious law, but, and this is important, saying that an entire organization is corrupt because of the actions of a relatively small percentage of actors is, well, stupid. And again, the current pope has been doing work to take care of this issue.

The church has always had a wall of silence though. It's finally breaking. It may not comfort those who have suffered for it but it can prevent it in the future.

And ultimately, everyone is human. Pedophiles are sympathetic in the sense that, they were BORN pedophiles. If homosexuality, heterosexuality, et al, is not a choice, then neither is any other form of sexuality. In the churches past, it acted as a bastion (ironically) for homosexuals to both live their lives in peace and sometimes find other homosexuals to have relations with. Pedophilia when ACTED upon is illegal and abhorrent. Merely -being- a pedophile is not, because they got boned when the dice were rolled on assigning sexuality.

The church must clean up, it must hold accountable those within the organization, and in most ways the current Pope is doing just that. Not sure what else you want.
 
Last edited:
C

Chuckt

Guest
Which central authority? The pope? The pope didn't know.

Our local church started saving for a building but then a dozen or more people put their names on the account making it an "AND" (joint account) account so without the other signatures, the money couldn't be spent because all names a required to sign. It reduces fraud.

However, when Catholics say that the Church is the authority then the church never does anything wrong and there is no need for oversight which tells me that there is probably more things going on that you will never hear about because there is no oversight and no accountability. This mindset allows the pedifilia to go on, the embezzlement to go on, etc., because the person in the pew cannot question the authority. If I go to the local Catholic church, can I see their books or can I see the cooked books?

The McDonald's analogy is their application process is, "Do you want a job" and they are kids who want no responsibility which is why they don't really have real jobs.
 

Bird Dog

Bird Dog
PREMO Member
Our local church started saving for a building but then a dozen or more people put their names on the account making it an "AND" (joint account) account so without the other signatures, the money couldn't be spent because all names a required to sign. It reduces fraud.

If I go to the local Catholic church, can I see their books or can I see the cooked books?

.
Of course...local chuches have local boards and public accountants that do their books. As usual you don't know what the F..k your talking about.
Genius
 
C

Chuckt

Guest
Of course...local chuches have local boards and public accountants that do their books. As usual you don't know what the F..k your talking about.
Genius

The company where I work has accountants and we are audited by outside accountants. It has been corrected but one of the past accountants didn't pay the worker's social security for a year and it wasn't discovered until someone went to retire.
Just because you have an accountant doesn't mean that it can't happen. It means your church may not be sophisticated enough to figure out the problem.
 

Monello

Smarter than the average bear
PREMO Member
PricewaterhouseCoopers to audit the Vatican

This is a good first step. The results could be quite interesting.

The Vatican on Saturday announced that accounting giant PricewaterhouseCoopers will carry out its first external audit, as Pope Francis seeks to make the Holy See's finances more transparent

Show PWC the money
 

TheLibertonian

New Member
Our local church started saving for a building but then a dozen or more people put their names on the account making it an "AND" (joint account) account so without the other signatures, the money couldn't be spent because all names a required to sign. It reduces fraud.

However, when Catholics say that the Church is the authority then the church never does anything wrong and there is no need for oversight which tells me that there is probably more things going on that you will never hear about because there is no oversight and no accountability. This mindset allows the pedifilia to go on, the embezzlement to go on, etc., because the person in the pew cannot question the authority. If I go to the local Catholic church, can I see their books or can I see the cooked books?

The McDonald's analogy is their application process is, "Do you want a job" and they are kids who want no responsibility which is why they don't really have real jobs.

I'm sorry, you seemed to have catholicism and protestantism confused. Catholic priest are required to earn a degree. Then they have to display their knowledge of biblical theology, NOT TEXT, to other priest, and they have to complete at least four years of seminary.

http://study.com/articles/Become_a_Catholic_Priest_Step-by-Step_Career_Guide.html

Any protestant can declare themselves a priest, admittedly depending on individual denominations and such. Which is why catholic priest tend to be decent theologians and a lot of protestant reborn preachers not so much.

One of the reasons the goers of the church may not question everything the priest says is because the priest spent 4 years studying theology and the bible at seminary before being allowed to become a priest. Far be it from me to declare the greengrocer reborn can't be a good theologian though.

Also, you're flat out wrong. Again, you're confusing protestant fundamentalism with catholic interpretation. I'ts one of the key differences between Catholicism and parts of Protestantism.

The church is not considered infallible, by any stretch, because catholic doctrine is that they don't believe that the bible was literally written by god. It's a book about god written by men, who are fallible. The bible is not to be literally taken.

The concept of Papal Infallibility is often misunderstood. The infallibility of the pope is only brought in when he speaks "ex cathedra", which is a specific thing that he has to declare before hand. Otherwise, if the pope is NOT speaking ex cathedra, he's not considered to be infallible.

"the Roman Pontiff"
"speaks ex cathedra" ("that is, when in the discharge of his office as shepherd and teacher of all Christians, and by virtue of his supreme apostolic authority....")
"he defines"
"that a doctrine concerning faith or morals"
"must be held by the whole Church"
 

onel0126

Bead mumbler
"the Roman Pontiff" "speaks ex cathedra" ("that is, when in the discharge of his office as shepherd and teacher of all Christians, and by virtue of his supreme apostolic authority....") "he defines" "that a doctrine concerning faith or morals" "must be held by the whole Church"

And in two thousand years, this has only been done twice!
 
C

Chuckt

Guest
I'm sorry, you seemed to have catholicism and protestantism confused. Catholic priest are required to earn a degree. Then they have to display their knowledge of biblical theology, NOT TEXT, to other priest, and they have to complete at least four years of seminary.

http://study.com/articles/Become_a_Catholic_Priest_Step-by-Step_Career_Guide.html

Any protestant can declare themselves a priest, admittedly depending on individual denominations and such. Which is why catholic priest tend to be decent theologians and a lot of protestant reborn preachers not so much.

One of the reasons the goers of the church may not question everything the priest says is because the priest spent 4 years studying theology and the bible at seminary before being allowed to become a priest. Far be it from me to declare the greengrocer reborn can't be a good theologian though.

Also, you're flat out wrong. Again, you're confusing protestant fundamentalism with catholic interpretation. I'ts one of the key differences between Catholicism and parts of Protestantism.

The church is not considered infallible, by any stretch, because catholic doctrine is that they don't believe that the bible was literally written by god. It's a book about god written by men, who are fallible. The bible is not to be literally taken.

The concept of Papal Infallibility is often misunderstood. The infallibility of the pope is only brought in when he speaks "ex cathedra", which is a specific thing that he has to declare before hand. Otherwise, if the pope is NOT speaking ex cathedra, he's not considered to be infallible.

"the Roman Pontiff"
"speaks ex cathedra" ("that is, when in the discharge of his office as shepherd and teacher of all Christians, and by virtue of his supreme apostolic authority....")
"he defines"
"that a doctrine concerning faith or morals"
"must be held by the whole Church"

You're changing what I'm talking about. I never said that Catholic priests didn't have education.
 

TheLibertonian

New Member
It's nice to have another apologetic here.
I wish I was as well versed as you two......

Apologetic?

I'm an Atheist. I just happen to have a background in religious history.

I apologize for nothing. But if people are going to hate, going to despise, going to destroy, they must do so from a position of knowledge. Hating something based on ignorance is foolish. Hate something because of the truth of it.

IF I need to make crap up to hate something then it probably doesn't deserve my hate, say, unlike stalinism or facism or the castes system etc.
 
Top