Priest Tells Paper of Innappropriate Behavior with Foley

vraiblonde

Board Mommy
PREMO Member
Patron
I wish with all my heart that these nasty old men would keep their ridiculous sex lives to themselves. That story just gave me a mental picture that is better for appetite suppressing that phen-phen.

:dead:
 

harleygirl

Working for the weekend
nachomama said:
SARASOTA, Florida (AP) -- A Roman Catholic priest said he had an inappropriate two-year relationship with former Rep. Mark Foley in the 1960s that included massaging the boy in the nude, but he did not specifically remember having sex, a newspaper reported Thursday.

http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/10/19/foley.priest.ap/index.html
Why does he not take responsibility for his actions?? I am sooo sick of people blaming something else for their deviant behavior......... :banghead:

Mercieca said there was one night when he was in a drug-induced stupor and there was an incident but he couldn't clearly remember, the newspaper reported.

"I have to confess, I was going through a nervous breakdown," the newspaper reported Mercieca as saying from his home on the island of Gozo, south of Sicily. "I was taking pills -- tranquilizers. I used to take them all the time. They affected my mind a little bit."
 

nachomama

All Up In Your Grill
I think what bothers me more is that had Foley not been caught doing what he did, this priest would have taken that secret to his grave. It's a vicious cycle. His treatment toward Foley caused Foley to treat other teens the same way. And we are raised to respect clergy. I think I'd rather my kids watch church tv on Sundays; at least that way they may be safer. I can't even look at a priest without wondering if he's done something like that to a child.
 

vraiblonde

Board Mommy
PREMO Member
Patron
desertrat said:
I love the way Foley is now the victim.
I'm totally over Foley. Now I'm focused on why this priest decided to share his deviant sexual desires with the world. :twitch:

He could have simply acknowledged the pedophilia (which WAS pedophlia because Foley was only 13 when this crap took place) and left out the details.

And the kicker:
Mercieca said although Foley plans to "expose him to the world," he still has "great memories of our trips," the newspaper reported.

I'm sure you do, creepo. :dead:
 

SamSpade

Well-Known Member
PREMO Member
nachomama said:
I can't even look at a priest without wondering if he's done something like that to a child.

I've read statistics that show that pedophilia is no more prevalent among priests than among the general public. It's even less if you dismiss the cases with teenagers who are consenting. It's still predatory, but it's not pedophilia.

We consider it outrageous when *priests* do it, because we presume that as servants of God, they're supposed to be held to a higher moral standard - and I think that's right, actually. They should be. If you're dedicating your life to serving God as your full-time work, I would expect your morals to be at least better than average. Actually, I feel that way about anyone who wears their religion on their sleeve - if you preach it, you must practice it and be at least a cut above ME, or I won't respect you or your words (because being more righteous than ME is not a big task).

It just seems more outrageous because we trust these men.

But other statistics DID alarm me. Teachers, and day care workers. Pedophilia BETTER BE less prevalent among them. Priests, my kids aren't gonna be around them much. *Teachers* and day-care workers, they're going to be EXCLUSIVELY around these, and therefore they have to be above reproach in these areas.
 

nachomama

All Up In Your Grill
SamSpade said:
Teachers, and day care workers. Pedophilia BETTER BE less prevalent among them. Priests, my kids aren't gonna be around them much. *Teachers* and day-care workers, they're going to be EXCLUSIVELY around these, and therefore they have to be above reproach in these areas.

So true!
 
Top