Project 2025

Kyle

Beloved Misanthrope
PREMO Member
IMG_0759.jpeg
 

Merlin99

Visualize whirled peas
PREMO Member
I looked over the P2025 proposal and I can see a lot of things that I agree with in it. The thing I like best is canx the DOE. It’s biggest purpose in existence was to use as a club to enforce federal dogma.
 

Sneakers

Just sneakin' around....
I looked over the P2025 proposal and I can see a lot of things that I agree with in it. The thing I like best is canx the DOE. It’s biggest purpose in existence was to use as a club to enforce federal dogma.
Yes, and no. I do remember back in the day (50-60s) when my dad worked at a nuke research facility. The DoE was pretty on top of nuke safety and protocols, and they took their jobs seriously. Not so much these days.
 

HemiHauler

Well-Known Member
Yes, and no. I do remember back in the day (50-60s) when my dad worked at a nuke research facility. The DoE was pretty on top of nuke safety and protocols, and they took their jobs seriously. Not so much these days.
Department of Education
 

HemiHauler

Well-Known Member
I don’t see much wrong with Project 2025. The problem is that Trump will not do a thing with any of it. He’s demonstrated loud and clear he has no intention/interest in reducing the size/scope of the federal juggernaut.

Removing a few regulations in his first term does not a small government adherent make.

No 2A supporter here will bother to look, but his antagonism towards firearms should be quite alarming.

But cults. That’s how they work.
 

stgislander

Well-Known Member
PREMO Member
Yes, and no. I do remember back in the day (50-60s) when my dad worked at a nuke research facility. The DoE was pretty on top of nuke safety and protocols, and they took their jobs seriously. Not so much these days.
I think she meant Dept of Education.
 

LightRoasted

If I may ...
For your consideration ...

I don’t see much wrong with Project 2025. The problem is that Trump will not do a thing with any of it. He’s demonstrated loud and clear he has no intention/interest in reducing the size/scope of the federal juggernaut.

And just how would he do this without Congress. There is only so much executive orders can do. Besides, tackling the mountain that is government would create a huge avalanche of blowback. He can chip away it, but a direct assault would be an exercise in futility; unless he had the actionable support of Congress and the people.
 

HemiHauler

Well-Known Member
For your consideration ...



And just how would he do this without Congress. There is only so much executive orders can do. Besides, tackling the mountain that is government would create a huge avalanche of blowback. He can chip away it, but a direct assault would be an exercise in futility; unless he had the actionable support of Congress and the people.
And that too.

Spreading FUD as usual.
 
Top