Like most published studies, you can cherry pick facts to support your arguments. The article is still an interesting read. I don't think there is any way to quantify just how much is too much. It varies by the child.
http://www.cnn.com/2014/05/09/opinion/drexler-mamas-boys/index.html?hpt=hp_t4
Mama's boys are often perceived as weak; a close relationship between mother and son is viewed as suspect. And yet studies support the idea that boys who grow up having tight relationships with their mothers have a certain advantage. They become strong, independent leaders. Just look at the commander in chief. Barack Obama has gladly admitted: He was a mama's boy.
kids, especially boys, who have secure attachments to their mothers tended to have fewer behavioral problems throughout their childhoods. Later on, they were expected to display fewer signs of aggression and hostility. They were, it stands to reason, more adaptable, more patient.
They were more likely to have a healthy respect for women. I learned that mothers who allowed and encouraged boys to show their more emotional side helped their sons develop confidence and empathy.
http://www.cnn.com/2014/05/09/opinion/drexler-mamas-boys/index.html?hpt=hp_t4
Last edited: