Real Lawyer Explains the The Mueller Report - Viva Frei Vlawg

[GURPS]

 

[Yooper]

Let's add this:

The Mueller report revisited

The investigative affiliate of RealClearPolitics has posted Aaron Maté's long examination of key findings in the Mueller report: 'CrowdStrikeOut: Mueller’s Own Report Undercuts Its Core Russia-Meddling Claims.' Among other things, according to Maté, largely undisputed headline assertions that...

www.powerlineblog.com

A snip to perhaps grab your interest (the last two paragraphs):

Maté concedes that the Mueller report’s core finding of “sweeping and systematic” Russian government election interference is not necessarily false, but argues that the report presents insufficient evidence to substantiate the thesis. That leaves serious doubt about the genesis and perpetuation of Russiagate and the performance of those tasked with investigating it.

Maté is a left-wing journalist and former host/producer for The Real News as well as Amy Goodman’s execrable Democracy Now! program. He has a long record of skepticism toward the Russiagate conspiracy reflected in his work for the Nation, compiled here. Even though Maté’s RCP piece in part revisits familiar ground, I thought that some readers would find it of interest, as I did.

--- End of line (MCP)

 

[GURPS]

Well that is just inconvenient to the Progressive Narrative

 

[Midnightrider]

if you read the report for yourself you don't need anyone to explain it to you. Seriously, think for yourselves.

 

[GregV814]

Well I follow every speck of your salient observations rumprider, with enthusiasm, then laugh. You know Mad Magazine is closing shop. Maybe you can join forces with those soon to be terminated writers and get a 3am cable channel in Salvador..

 

[SamSpade]

You know, we keep coming back to the nugget of news that says the Russians interfered in our election.

I'd like to thank whomever it was that created this next little meme, because I've used it a lot since :

If I piss in the ocean, I am certain it contributes to the rising of the seas - but it is clearly insignificant.


The "fact" that they interfered is irrelevant because it is positively clear it had no actual effect on the outcome - ANYWHERE.
No - it didn't. "But it MIGHT have changed enough minds to turn a state!". No, it didn't.

The concern of ours is - did Americans seek them out or cooperate with them ("collude"). Because although it didn't affect anything,
it's still illegal.

"But - but - Russians interfered! Do you deny that?". Of course not. PISS in the ocean. No really, go piss in the ocean.
See how much you change it. The Russian goal was not to thwart the election - it was to cause YOU to flip out over it.
And they succeeded.