Love this guy.
Takeaways:
Be sure to see his other video about Sandmann's suit against Comcast Universal:
https://forums.somd.com/threads/real-lawyer-explains-nicholas-sandmann-defamation-lawsuit-against-nbc.341713/
Takeaways:
- Even if the respective court doesn't require it, he's surprised that they didn't number the lines or paragraphs in the document; thus making it so much harder to refer to anything. (each court might have different requirements)
- This doesn't even resemble a Motion to Dismiss. They're essentially arguing the case on evidence that has yet to be presented/determined. Example of a legit motion to dismiss: Even if we assume plaintiff is 100% correct in his allegations, we are 5 years past the statute of limitations to file the case.
- No way they'll prevail and the case will proceed.
- Why did the WaPo lawyers even bother to submit this motion? “Procedural harassment”… make Sandmann’s lawyers work, incur fees. That’s one reason. But we’ll talk about the rest [at a later time]. (he added this remark to the comments section when the question was posed by a viewer...he forgot to address it in the video)
Be sure to see his other video about Sandmann's suit against Comcast Universal:
https://forums.somd.com/threads/real-lawyer-explains-nicholas-sandmann-defamation-lawsuit-against-nbc.341713/
Last edited: