Reuters Hypes Hugo's Excellent Adventure in Marxis

cwo_ghwebb

No Use for Donk Twits
farming.

Leave it to Reuters in this April 29 article, to express surprise that Hugo Chavez' planned economy, complete with “land reform,” price controls and forced production, is failing. Even worse, reporter Frank Jack Daniels relied on a Marxist outlook and socialist jargon to pretend that those tired policies weren't to blame.

Chavez wants to increase domestic food production; so,
of course, the logical solution is to base the recovery on Marxist economics. After watching the failed totalitarian agronomics of Cuba and Russia, you'd think they could have invested a few bucks in a SimCity game so they could practice a little first.

Reuters framed the article as if it had been cribbed from a social justice and peace studies textbook. Daniels listed the same practices that devastated the Soviet Union's economy and resulted in bread lines, and yet, without a trace of facetiousness, wrote “Even so, some products have been scarce” as if the policies aren't related to the problems. That takes either a total lack of basic economics, which means he shouldn't be writing about Venezuela's economy, or Daniels has ignored the news for the last 30 years and believes planned economies work.


Reuters Hypes Hugo's Excellent Adventure in Marxist Farming | NewsBusters.org

Socialists are absolutely amazing in being able to ignore the facts. Socialism has never worked successfully. It assumes humans are little tin soldiers, all cast from the same die, and stifles the human condition.

Government does have usefulness in constraining those folks whose unbridled greed would harm the general population, i.e. controlling utilities.

Socialist always blame other factors for the failure of their economic system. They want to think it would work, if only they were in charge, but when they do get in charge, they find they're not quite as bright as they thought.
 

vraiblonde

Board Mommy
PREMO Member
Patron
you'd think they could have invested a few bucks in a SimCity game so they could practice a little first.

:lol:

Ever wonder why someone would subscribe to a theory that has never worked as advertised, and has done significant harm to mankind?

It's about power.

There is not one single Socialist or Communist government that doesn't have a dictator at the head of it, raking in the cash and goodies, executing/torturing/jailing people at-will, and generally reaping the rewards of their citizens' suffering.

What I don't understand is how free people can get on board with something like this. Leftist Progressives are not stupid people - many are highly educated and know a good bit about the world around them and history. Yet they STILL vote for ultimate government control, knowing full well how that's worked out for other countries.

So Lefties - answer the question. WHY do you support this sort of thing? Do you honestly think the US will do it right, when so many other countries have tried and failed?
 
Top