Saudi Oil

Gilligan

Gilligan

#*! boat!
PREMO Member
BernieP said:
:killingme - it's funny to read the reply to something I can't see (even the quote is blocked). But I suspect it's in response to one of the resident dimwits trolls.
Instead of living under a bridge, they live in their mom's basement.
Click to expand...
I blocked the Tranny tool a long time ago, but you can't miss the stench she leaves behind every thread she visits.
 
T

The Boss

Active Member
truby20 said:
Against my better judgment, I’m posting

Drone strikes against Saudi oil resources have taken out 50% of their oil production facilities

www.foxnews.com

Pompeo accuses Iran of 'unprecedented attack' after drones hit Saudi oil facilities

Secretary of State Mike Pompeo called on the international community to join him Saturday in condemning Iran for drone attacks on two Saudi oil facilities, which he described as "an unprecedented attack on the world’s energy supply."
www.foxnews.com www.foxnews.com

Saudi Arabia is the second largest oil producer, we’re #1

en.m.wikipedia.org

List of countries by oil production - Wikipedia

en.m.wikipedia.org en.m.wikipedia.org

What is our omnipresent leader going to do? Hold on for the spike in gas prices.
Click to expand...
No proof yet Iran did anything ,Pompeo is the one saying it.Don't put it past trump to do this just to start a war ,he thinks it will keep him in Office.
 
B

BernieP

Resident PIA
Gilligan said:
You think it was the same crew that put all the explosive charges in the World Trade Center towers?..or somebody else?
Click to expand...
Guess he didn't read the part about the Saudi government or the UN or the logistics of reaching the sight from Yemen.

Yet Trump is guilty, of something, haven't found it yet, but he'll keep looking.
In the mean time, ignore real evidence.
Unlikely the strike came from the south, from inside Yemen (as claimed by the rebels there).
But there is no question where the arms came from (reported by the UN, confirmed by the same rebels)
 
This_person

This_person

Well-Known Member
Clem72 said:
Iran? Maybe it's Malice's influence, but I feel like this was a US sponsored attack. 19 sites, just after 9-11 (you know, when 19 hijackers sponsored by SA attacked us), and conveniently just after Bolten leaves office so we can say "no, couldn't be us, we just got rid of the guy that gets harder than Portland cement every time someone says the words bomb and Iran in the same sentence".
Click to expand...
Just so you know, SA didn't "sponsor" the 9/11 attacks.
 
This_person

This_person

Well-Known Member
The Boss said:
No proof yet Iran did anything ,Pompeo is the one saying it.Don't put it past trump to do this just to start a war ,he thinks it will keep him in Office.
Click to expand...

Presidents have been known to do that. Remember this one, right before the 2012 election?
"We have been very clear to the Assad regime -- but also to other players on the ground -- that a red line for us is we start seeing a whole bunch of chemical weapons moving around or being utilized.
"That would change my calculus; that would change my equation."​

I would worry more about Trump being ready to do something, though, because Trump would actually do something.
 
T

The Boss

Active Member
Gilligan said:
You think it was the same crew that put all the explosive charges in the World Trade Center towers?..or somebody else?
Click to expand...
See that's just it I have no way of knowing but the sad thing is that I can't trust my president to find out or be honest it about it.
 
GURPS

GURPS

INGSOC
PREMO Member
The Boss said:
Don't put it past trump to do this just to start a war ,he thinks it will keep him in Office.
Click to expand...

Fantasy, Supposition, Innuendo, ASSUMPTION

If that were the case Trump would not have kicked out Bolton or stopped the attack on Iran a few weeks ago
 
Hijinx

Hijinx

Well-Known Member
The Boss said:
No proof yet Iran did anything ,Pompeo is the one saying it.Don't put it past trump to do this just to start a war ,he thinks it will keep him in Office.
Click to expand...

Trump doesn't need a war to keep him in office, when he has 20 Dildo's running against him and not one of them fit to shine his shoes.
 
Clem72

Clem72

Well-Known Member
This_person said:
Just so you know, SA didn't "sponsor" the 9/11 attacks.
Click to expand...

Didn't figure you for a spineless SA apologist. They provided monetary support, they funded dry-runs, they trained several of the attackers (a majority of which were from SA). The US government's official stance is "senior" members of the royal family did not provide support (oddly specific wording. Like saying the US Senate did not support X. What about the House? The President? Or any of the 3 letter agencies?). The US court system has okayed 911 victims and families to sue the government of SA.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alleged_Saudi_role_in_September_11_attacks
 
Clem72

Clem72

Well-Known Member
GURPS said:
If that were the case Trump would not have kicked out Bolton or stopped the attack on Iran a few weeks ago
Click to expand...

Aren't you the one that argues the President is playing 4 dimensional chess when everyone else plays checkers. If you decide you want to go to war with Iran, but don't want to look overly hawkish you "fire" bolton and you back off a meaningless attack playing up how you are being humane and saving lives. That's not even tic-tac-toe level strategizing.
 
Hijinx

Hijinx

Well-Known Member
Clem72 said:
Aren't you the one that argues the President is playing 4 dimensional chess when everyone else plays checkers. If you decide you want to go to war with Iran, but don't want to look overly hawkish you "fire" bolton and you back off a meaningless attack playing up how you are being humane and saving lives. That's not even tic-tac-toe level strategizing.
Click to expand...

A meaningless attack?
 
B

BernieP

Resident PIA
Trump did it, to sink his re-election campaign. Rise in crude prices could hurt the economy.

BTW, the word from experts is that it's temporary, that the Saudis will have the plant back up and fully operational soon.
 
This_person

This_person

Well-Known Member
Clem72 said:
Didn't figure you for a spineless SA apologist. They provided monetary support, they funded dry-runs, they trained several of the attackers (a majority of which were from SA). The US government's official stance is "senior" members of the royal family did not provide support (oddly specific wording. Like saying the US Senate did not support X. What about the House? The President? Or any of the 3 letter agencies?). The US court system has okayed 911 victims and families to sue the government of SA.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alleged_Saudi_role_in_September_11_attacks
Click to expand...
I'm no apologist. I think they're not great people.

But, your link provides a lot of conjecture with no substance. "May have", "could be"....it makes no sense for them to have done this, and also been so supportive of us.

Saudi Arabians were certainly involved in the greatest percentages, but that doesn't mean Saudi Arabia "sponsored".
 
GregV814

GregV814

Well-Known Member
Well trudydichweed, it looks like your silly rant is a misfire, as there will be no effect after all. Rebuilding is ahead of schedule and the refinery will reopen at 100% before the months end.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top