Scientist fired from university after discovering shocking d

[Chuckt]

Scientist fired from university after discovering shocking dinosaur bones believed to be only 4,000 years old

(NaturalNews) A recent archaeological discovery that throws a wrench into the conventional theory of evolution has reportedly cost a California professor his job. Mark Armitage, a former scientist at California State University, Northridge (CSUN), was reportedly fired after claiming to have unearthed a dinosaur fossil that still contains soft, flexible tissue, suggesting that it can't be millions of years old.

http://www.naturalnews.com/046315_dinosaur_fossils_soft_tissue_wrongful_termination.html

 

[onel0126]

Scientist fired from university after discovering shocking dinosaur bones believed to be only 4,000 years old http://www.naturalnews.com/046315_dinosaur_fossils_soft_tissue_wrongful_termination.html

Oh dear Lord you're a young earther to boot...I wish Ken Lamb was not the go to guy for debates against the Bill Nye's of the world. They need to stick a good Jesuit scientist up there sometime.

 

[Chuckt]

Oh dear Lord you're a young earther to boot...I wish Ken Lamb was not the go to guy for debates against the Bill Nye's of the world. They need to stick a good Jesuit scientist up there sometime.

Instead of saying, "no" and instead of deferring to some Jesuit scientist, why don't you ask, "Why?" and think for yourself?

 

[MMDad]

Shouldn't this be in the "conspiracy theory" forum instead of religion?

 

[Chuckt]

Shouldn't this be in the "conspiracy theory" forum instead of religion?

If you look at the fossil under the microscope and see that it has soft tissue then you either think for yourself or shelf it to the conspiracy theory shelf.

His findings were published in a peer reviewed scientific journal, been a college professor for thirty years, etc.

http://losangeles.cbslocal.com/2014...-discovery-of-soft-tissue-on-dinosaur-fossil/

http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0065128113000020

 

[MMDad]

4,000 year old dinosaur bones. Right. What a buffoon.

 

[stgislander]

Maybe it was a dragon. :shrug:

 

[Gilligan]

Maybe it was a dragon. :shrug:

There ^..bet that's what it was. Lots of dragons around then.

 

[ProximaCentauri]

Scientist fired from university after discovering shocking dinosaur bones believed to be only 4,000 years old



http://www.naturalnews.com/046315_dinosaur_fossils_soft_tissue_wrongful_termination.html

It's too bad we can't transport humans like yourself back to this time period to find out for yourself. With a one way ticket. You really should not be living in the 21st century.

 

[stgislander]

There ^..bet that's what it was. Lots of dragons around then.

Druids know all about dragons huh?

 

[Gilligan]

Druids know all about dragons huh?

Yup. We even domesticated them. Kinda a stupid move, in hindsight, considering what they eat and how much of it. And dragon poop...shewweee...worse than a golden retriever smells after rolling in a 10-day-old fish carcass.

If ya know what I mean.

 

[Chuckt]

4,000 year old dinosaur bones. Right. What a buffoon.

Nobody here asked why there was soft tissue on the dinosaur bone. If you are so tolerant of others asking questions than why are you calling me a buffoon?

 

[jrt_ms1995]

Nobody here asked why there was soft tissue on the dinosaur bone.

Dead worms, maybe?

 

[Chuckt]

Dead worms, maybe?

Wouldn't they be able to tell the difference in tissue with a microscope?

 

[MMDad]

Wouldn't they be able to tell the difference in tissue with a microscope?

Do you have some dinosaur tissue to use as a comparison?

Tell us all about those 4,000 year old dinosaur bones.

 

[Chuckt]

Do you have some dinosaur tissue to use as a comparison?

Tell us all about those 4,000 year old dinosaur bones.

No but I think if you compared tissues from many other animals and bodies donated to research, you could tell the difference between a worm on a fossil and tissue that was from skeletal remains.