Robert Swanson
New Member
(this information is posted here so that any members of the Seafarers International Union which is located in Maryland and has a School at Piney Point Maryland will know that they are spending your money illegally to try to derail the rank and file union effort which is being fostered by the Seamen's Justice Center)
The Seafarers International Union has been harassing me for over 2
years now and recently filed this action in State Court-Again. It was
voluntarily dismissed once because the SIU's lawyer was forum
shopping. It was refiled in Federal Court, two branches before they
got that right. It was later dismissed by the District Court For the
Southern District of Iowa because the SIU has members in Iowa and
therefor could not claim Diversity. The poor souls they just can't
seem to get it right no matter how hard they try. This time they have
included a False Affidavit from the writer who initially provided us
with the information that Mike Sacco is a made member of the mob. I
don't know how they turned the guy but I can imagine either money or
pressure. I have included that affidavit with the true facts after
each averment.
I would appreciate any help members of this forum can give me in
re-posting this information to other labor groups.
Thank You
Robert Swanson
IN THE IOWA DISTRICT COURT IN AND FOR CLINTON COUNTY
SEAFARERS INTERNATIONAL UNION,
Atlantic, Gulf, Lakes CASE NO. CV3 1086
and Inland Waters
District! NMU, AFL-CIO,
MEMORANDUM
Plaintiff, IN SUPPORT OF
ROBERT E. SWANSON and RQUEST FOR INJUNCTION
SEAMEN'S JUSTICE CENTER,
Defendants.
COMES NOW the Plaintiff and in support of its request for injunctive
relief does respectfully state to the court as follows:
LEGAL STANDARD
Iowa Rule of Civil Procedure 1. 1502 describes the circumstances in
which a court may issue temporary injunctive relief. The Plaintiff
alleges that ICRP 1.1502(1) provides the court with the authority for
temporary injunctive relief in this case. That Rule provides that a
temporary injunction may be allowed,
When the petition, supported by affidavit, shows that the plaintiff is
entitled to relief which includes restraining the commission or
continuance of some act which would greatly or irreparably injure the
plaintiff.
A party requesting injunctive relief must show (1) an invasion or
threatened invasion of a right, (2) substantial injury or damages will
occur unless an injunction is granted and (3) no adequate remedy is
available at law. Opat u. Ludekir~g, 666 N.W.2d 597 (Iowa 2003),
quoting Skow v. Goforth, 618 N.W2d 275 (Iowa 2000). In considering
whether to issue an injunction, the court must weigh the relative
hardship on the parties which would result from the denial or granting
of the injunction. Myers v. Caple, 258 N.W.2d 301 (Iowa 1977). A
temporary injunction may be granted under the same standard as a
permanent injunction, however, the burden of proof is different.
Temporary injunction5 require a showing of the likelihood of success
on the merits whereas permanent injunctions require actual success.
PIG USA u. North carolina Farm Partners hzp, et al., 672 N.W.2d 718
(Iowa 2003).
APPLICATION OF THE STANDARD
The Petition in this case alleges that the Defendants Robert E.
Swanson and the non-profit corporation, the Seamen's Justice Center
have defamed the Plaintiff Seafarer's International Union, by among
other things, falsely claiming that the Union's President, Michael
Sacco, is a "made member of the Mafia" or is otherwise involved in
organized crime.
Defendants have disseminated this defamatory information primarily
through the use of the internet, including on the Defendant's own
website the address of which is www.seajustice.org and which is
operated by Defendant Robert E. Swanson, as webmaster, from his home
in DeWitt. That website has from time to time, included information
concerning purported links between President Sacco and organized
crime. Examples are attached hereto as Exhibit A.
In a deposition taken in earlier proceedings, Defendant Swanson
described three main "sources" for his claims: (1.) John Touhy, a
freelance journalist who has written extensively about organized
crime, (2) two individuals who Defendant Swanson refused to identify
and (3) anonymous calls and emails, The complete transcript is attaché
hereto as Exhibit 13. Most of the discussion of sources appears at pp.
87-92.
John Tuohy has provided an affidavit in which he repudiates the claims
attributed to him by Defendant Swanson. Tuohy's affidavit is attached
as Exhibit C. .The affidavit was provided to Defendant Swanson,
through his counsel, on June 30, 2004. Defendants have continued their
defamatory statements even though it is apparent that they have no
basis in fact.
The Defendants' defamatory statements have caused irreparable injury
to the Plaintiff by interfering with its ability to organize workers
in the maritime industry and to recruit new members. Affidavits from
John Spadaro, Jordan Biscardo, Thomas Orzechowki and Jessica Smith are
attached hereto as Exhibits D, E, F and G, respectively. Those
affidavits detail the negative effects that have resulted from
Defendants' defamatory statements.
The Plaintiff is requesting that Defendants be temporarily restrained
from making unfounded accusations of criminal activity against
President Sacco or other officers or agents of the Union, while this
action is pending.
Without this injunctive relief, the Plaintiff will continue to suffer
irreparable harm, Plaintiff's have no adequate remedy at law. Given
the Defendants' financial circumstances it is unlikely that the
Plaintiff will ever recover damages sufficient to compensate it for
its losses.
The issuance of a tempory restraining order, as described above, will
not adversely affect the rights of the Defendants or the interests of
the public. Plaintiff's request is limited in scope and in time and
seeks only to prohibit the dissemination of clearly false, defamatory
and damaging information
WHEREFORE the Plaintiff requests that the Defendants be temporarily
restrained from making Unfounded accusations of criminal activity
against President Sacco or other officers or agents of the Union,
while this action is pending.
MATTHEW GLASSON L10001818
Glasson, Sole, McManus & Pearson, P.C.
118 3rU Ave. S.E,, Suite 830
Cedar Rapids, IA 52401-1440
(319) 366-4313 phone
(319) 366-0368 fax
maglasson@qwest.net
ATTORNEY FOR PLAINTIFF
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
IN THE IOWA DISTRICT COURT FOR CLINTON COUNTY
SEAFARERS INTERNATIONAL UNION, ) LAW NO. CV3 1086
Atlantic. Gulf. Lakes and Inland Water )
District/NMU, AFL-CIO, )
)
Plaintiffs, )
)
vs. )
ROBERT E. SWANSON and )
SEAMAN'S JUSTICE CENTER, )
)
Defendants. )
COME NOW the defendants by their attorneys McCarthy, Lamniers & Hines
and resists the plaintiff's motion for injunctive relief as follows:
1. This is the same action that the plaintiff filed two years ago in
this court in cause no. CV29267. In that action the plaintiff
requested an injunction for the same reasons it now urges and that
injunction was denied by an order of this court in that cause on
November 24, 2003. The defendants request this court take judicial
notice of its own file in CV29627, including all matters pleaded and
filed in that cause. The plaintiffs motion for injunction should be
denied for the same reasons set out by this court in its ruling two
years ago, i.e., the plaintiff has an adequate remedy at law and it
has a heavy burden of proof under the New York Times v. Sullivan
standard to establish actual malice in defamation action. The actual
malice standard in defamation actions apply to claims in the union
context. Old Dominion Branch No. 496, National Association of Letter
Carriers v. Austin, 418 U.S. 264 (1974).
2. The granting of an injunction against the defendants in this case
would violate the defendants' free speech rights under the
constitution of the United States and the State of Iowa, which prevent
the imposition of prior restraint against speech except in the most
serious circumstance. Des Moines Register and Tribune Company v.
Osmundson, 248 N.W.2d 493, 498 (Iowa 1976); Organization for a Better
Austin v. Keefe, 402 U.S. 415, 419 (1971).
3. The plaintiffs cannot establish the necessary element of
irreparable injury. However, prior restraint of speech by this court
would constitute irreparable injury to the defendants for which there
can be no redress. The loss of first amendment freedoms, even for
minimal periods of time, unquestionably constitutes irreparable
injury. Iowa Right to Life v. Williams, 187 F.3d 963, 970 (8th Cir.
1999).
4. If the plaintiff has been harmed, such harm is readily compensable
by money damages. Successful defamation plaintiffs regularly prove and
receive money damages. For this reason, absent extraordinary
circumstances an injunction should not ordinarily issue in defamation
cases. Metropolitan Opera Association v. Local 100, 239 F.3d 172 (2fld
Cir. 2001).
WHEREFORE, the defendants pray the court deny the plaintiffs motion
for injunction. They pray for such other and further relief as the
court deems equitable in the premises.
McCARTHY, LAMMERS & HINES
The Seafarers International Union has been harassing me for over 2
years now and recently filed this action in State Court-Again. It was
voluntarily dismissed once because the SIU's lawyer was forum
shopping. It was refiled in Federal Court, two branches before they
got that right. It was later dismissed by the District Court For the
Southern District of Iowa because the SIU has members in Iowa and
therefor could not claim Diversity. The poor souls they just can't
seem to get it right no matter how hard they try. This time they have
included a False Affidavit from the writer who initially provided us
with the information that Mike Sacco is a made member of the mob. I
don't know how they turned the guy but I can imagine either money or
pressure. I have included that affidavit with the true facts after
each averment.
I would appreciate any help members of this forum can give me in
re-posting this information to other labor groups.
Thank You
Robert Swanson
IN THE IOWA DISTRICT COURT IN AND FOR CLINTON COUNTY
SEAFARERS INTERNATIONAL UNION,
Atlantic, Gulf, Lakes CASE NO. CV3 1086
and Inland Waters
District! NMU, AFL-CIO,
MEMORANDUM
Plaintiff, IN SUPPORT OF
ROBERT E. SWANSON and RQUEST FOR INJUNCTION
SEAMEN'S JUSTICE CENTER,
Defendants.
COMES NOW the Plaintiff and in support of its request for injunctive
relief does respectfully state to the court as follows:
LEGAL STANDARD
Iowa Rule of Civil Procedure 1. 1502 describes the circumstances in
which a court may issue temporary injunctive relief. The Plaintiff
alleges that ICRP 1.1502(1) provides the court with the authority for
temporary injunctive relief in this case. That Rule provides that a
temporary injunction may be allowed,
When the petition, supported by affidavit, shows that the plaintiff is
entitled to relief which includes restraining the commission or
continuance of some act which would greatly or irreparably injure the
plaintiff.
A party requesting injunctive relief must show (1) an invasion or
threatened invasion of a right, (2) substantial injury or damages will
occur unless an injunction is granted and (3) no adequate remedy is
available at law. Opat u. Ludekir~g, 666 N.W.2d 597 (Iowa 2003),
quoting Skow v. Goforth, 618 N.W2d 275 (Iowa 2000). In considering
whether to issue an injunction, the court must weigh the relative
hardship on the parties which would result from the denial or granting
of the injunction. Myers v. Caple, 258 N.W.2d 301 (Iowa 1977). A
temporary injunction may be granted under the same standard as a
permanent injunction, however, the burden of proof is different.
Temporary injunction5 require a showing of the likelihood of success
on the merits whereas permanent injunctions require actual success.
PIG USA u. North carolina Farm Partners hzp, et al., 672 N.W.2d 718
(Iowa 2003).
APPLICATION OF THE STANDARD
The Petition in this case alleges that the Defendants Robert E.
Swanson and the non-profit corporation, the Seamen's Justice Center
have defamed the Plaintiff Seafarer's International Union, by among
other things, falsely claiming that the Union's President, Michael
Sacco, is a "made member of the Mafia" or is otherwise involved in
organized crime.
Defendants have disseminated this defamatory information primarily
through the use of the internet, including on the Defendant's own
website the address of which is www.seajustice.org and which is
operated by Defendant Robert E. Swanson, as webmaster, from his home
in DeWitt. That website has from time to time, included information
concerning purported links between President Sacco and organized
crime. Examples are attached hereto as Exhibit A.
In a deposition taken in earlier proceedings, Defendant Swanson
described three main "sources" for his claims: (1.) John Touhy, a
freelance journalist who has written extensively about organized
crime, (2) two individuals who Defendant Swanson refused to identify
and (3) anonymous calls and emails, The complete transcript is attaché
hereto as Exhibit 13. Most of the discussion of sources appears at pp.
87-92.
John Tuohy has provided an affidavit in which he repudiates the claims
attributed to him by Defendant Swanson. Tuohy's affidavit is attached
as Exhibit C. .The affidavit was provided to Defendant Swanson,
through his counsel, on June 30, 2004. Defendants have continued their
defamatory statements even though it is apparent that they have no
basis in fact.
The Defendants' defamatory statements have caused irreparable injury
to the Plaintiff by interfering with its ability to organize workers
in the maritime industry and to recruit new members. Affidavits from
John Spadaro, Jordan Biscardo, Thomas Orzechowki and Jessica Smith are
attached hereto as Exhibits D, E, F and G, respectively. Those
affidavits detail the negative effects that have resulted from
Defendants' defamatory statements.
The Plaintiff is requesting that Defendants be temporarily restrained
from making unfounded accusations of criminal activity against
President Sacco or other officers or agents of the Union, while this
action is pending.
Without this injunctive relief, the Plaintiff will continue to suffer
irreparable harm, Plaintiff's have no adequate remedy at law. Given
the Defendants' financial circumstances it is unlikely that the
Plaintiff will ever recover damages sufficient to compensate it for
its losses.
The issuance of a tempory restraining order, as described above, will
not adversely affect the rights of the Defendants or the interests of
the public. Plaintiff's request is limited in scope and in time and
seeks only to prohibit the dissemination of clearly false, defamatory
and damaging information
WHEREFORE the Plaintiff requests that the Defendants be temporarily
restrained from making Unfounded accusations of criminal activity
against President Sacco or other officers or agents of the Union,
while this action is pending.
MATTHEW GLASSON L10001818
Glasson, Sole, McManus & Pearson, P.C.
118 3rU Ave. S.E,, Suite 830
Cedar Rapids, IA 52401-1440
(319) 366-4313 phone
(319) 366-0368 fax
maglasson@qwest.net
ATTORNEY FOR PLAINTIFF
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
IN THE IOWA DISTRICT COURT FOR CLINTON COUNTY
SEAFARERS INTERNATIONAL UNION, ) LAW NO. CV3 1086
Atlantic. Gulf. Lakes and Inland Water )
District/NMU, AFL-CIO, )
)
Plaintiffs, )
)
vs. )
ROBERT E. SWANSON and )
SEAMAN'S JUSTICE CENTER, )
)
Defendants. )
COME NOW the defendants by their attorneys McCarthy, Lamniers & Hines
and resists the plaintiff's motion for injunctive relief as follows:
1. This is the same action that the plaintiff filed two years ago in
this court in cause no. CV29267. In that action the plaintiff
requested an injunction for the same reasons it now urges and that
injunction was denied by an order of this court in that cause on
November 24, 2003. The defendants request this court take judicial
notice of its own file in CV29627, including all matters pleaded and
filed in that cause. The plaintiffs motion for injunction should be
denied for the same reasons set out by this court in its ruling two
years ago, i.e., the plaintiff has an adequate remedy at law and it
has a heavy burden of proof under the New York Times v. Sullivan
standard to establish actual malice in defamation action. The actual
malice standard in defamation actions apply to claims in the union
context. Old Dominion Branch No. 496, National Association of Letter
Carriers v. Austin, 418 U.S. 264 (1974).
2. The granting of an injunction against the defendants in this case
would violate the defendants' free speech rights under the
constitution of the United States and the State of Iowa, which prevent
the imposition of prior restraint against speech except in the most
serious circumstance. Des Moines Register and Tribune Company v.
Osmundson, 248 N.W.2d 493, 498 (Iowa 1976); Organization for a Better
Austin v. Keefe, 402 U.S. 415, 419 (1971).
3. The plaintiffs cannot establish the necessary element of
irreparable injury. However, prior restraint of speech by this court
would constitute irreparable injury to the defendants for which there
can be no redress. The loss of first amendment freedoms, even for
minimal periods of time, unquestionably constitutes irreparable
injury. Iowa Right to Life v. Williams, 187 F.3d 963, 970 (8th Cir.
1999).
4. If the plaintiff has been harmed, such harm is readily compensable
by money damages. Successful defamation plaintiffs regularly prove and
receive money damages. For this reason, absent extraordinary
circumstances an injunction should not ordinarily issue in defamation
cases. Metropolitan Opera Association v. Local 100, 239 F.3d 172 (2fld
Cir. 2001).
WHEREFORE, the defendants pray the court deny the plaintiffs motion
for injunction. They pray for such other and further relief as the
court deems equitable in the premises.
McCARTHY, LAMMERS & HINES