Sequestration Follies

BOP

Well-Known Member
PREMO Member
Try sitting in the middle of the Persian Gulf, in the middle of July, on a steel ship. The shop was 95 and the flight deck was 140. At night, the temp on deck got down to about 90/95 and the shop got down to 80. As soon as you stepped out of the shower, you started to sweat and as you walked down the 03 level, you would get rained on by the condensation dripping off of the over head. When you took a shower, it was with hot water because there wasn't anyway to chill it since the water temp was 95. If you sat for too long, you would leave a pool of sweat under your chair.

After going threw that on several cruises, 80 is nothing, and I get to go home after nine hours and take a cool shower.

Think of it this way, at least you aren't sitting in some steel box getting rained on, taking hot showers, working 16 on 8 off and eating three day old box lunches for four months straight.
You act like nobody else here has gone through that, or similar. News Flash: many of us, including the womenz on this forum, have been there, done that.

:buddies:
 

GW8345

Not White House Approved
You act like nobody else here has gone through that, or similar. News Flash: many of us, including the womenz on this forum, have been there, done that.

:buddies:
From the way civilians and contractor act on base, I would say there isn't many former/retired military working on base. I constantly see people driving around talking on cell phones, using the bike lanes as travel lanes, speeding, parking all over the grass because they are too lazy to eff'ing walk 30 feet.

There is former/retire military working on base, too bad we are few and far between. My message isn't directed to those few, it's directed to all those who I just listed above. It's directed to those civilians and contractors who think Pax River is some glorified corporate head quarter and not a military base.
 

DoWhat

Go Trump!!!!!
PREMO Member
From the way civilians and contractor act on base, I would say there isn't many former/retired military working on base. I constantly see people driving around talking on cell phones, using the bike lanes as travel lanes, speeding, parking all over the grass because they are too lazy to eff'ing walk 30 feet.

There is former/retire military working on base, too bad we are few and far between. My message isn't directed to those few, it's directed to all those who I just listed above. It's directed to those civilians and contractors who think Pax River is some glorified corporate head quarter and not a military base.
You sound to me like a complete idiot.
 
C

czygvtwkr

Guest
From the way civilians and contractor act on base, I would say there isn't many former/retired military working on base. I constantly see people driving around talking on cell phones, using the bike lanes as travel lanes, speeding, parking all over the grass because they are too lazy to eff'ing walk 30 feet.

There is former/retire military working on base, too bad we are few and far between. My message isn't directed to those few, it's directed to all those who I just listed above. It's directed to those civilians and contractors who think Pax River is some glorified corporate head quarter and not a military base.
Yea because former military don't talk on cellphones and drive badly............
 

DoWhat

Go Trump!!!!!
PREMO Member
And that's suppose to mean that you are smart?

Hell, Barry got a degree from Harvard and he's still one of the dumbest oxygen stealers' on the planet.
You talk about being in the Military.
What was your rate?
 

DoWhat

Go Trump!!!!!
PREMO Member
What difference does it make what rate I was?

If you are as smart as you say you are, you would have figured it out by now.
When did I say I was smart?
I just think you are an idiot, and that is coming from a dumba$$.
 

popsicle

Member
Hot off the presses

Subject: NEWS: Politico - Pentagon furloughs planned at 11 days

Pentagon furloughs planned at 11 days

Politico By STEPHANIE GASKELL | 5/14/13 8:09 AM EDT

Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel plans to announce Tuesday the Pentagon will furlough about 800,000 civilian employees to pay for budget cuts under sequestration, but for just 11 days, not 14 as previously contemplated, a senior Defense official told POLITICO.

The Pentagon had originally proposed 22 days of furloughs, but Hagel and his staff were able to reduce that to 14 days last month and vowed to try to further savings to mitigate the forced days off.

Hagel is expected to announce his decision Tuesday afternoon during a town hall meeting at the MARK Center in Alexandria, Va.

"He's reducing the number of furlough days from 14 to 11 and tried to reduce the number even more," the senior Defense official said. "But after several rounds of meetings on sequestration and asking for different furlough scenarios, he decided that we really don't have a choice but to save money for the remainder of FY13 to support military readiness, operations, and training."

"No one is happy with having to make this tough decision, especially him," the official added

Hagel will also allow exemptions for thousands of workers, The Associated Press first reported, including Navy employees working at shipyards.

The issue of furloughs has been looming over the Pentagon for months as defense leaders tried to find a way to pay for about $43 billion in cuts from sequestration, which began going into effect on March 1.

Navy Secretary Ray Mabus said he found savings within his department and would be able to avoid furloughing his civilian employees. But Hagel appeared to strike that down, saying the cuts would be implemented across the services in a "one team, one fight" approach.
 

edinsomd

New Member
Subject: NEWS: Politico - Pentagon furloughs planned at 11 days

Pentagon furloughs planned at 11 days

Politico By STEPHANIE GASKELL | 5/14/13 8:09 AM EDT

Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel plans to announce Tuesday the Pentagon will furlough about 800,000 civilian employees to pay for budget cuts under sequestration, but for just 11 days, not 14 as previously contemplated, a senior Defense official told POLITICO.

The Pentagon had originally proposed 22 days of furloughs, but Hagel and his staff were able to reduce that to 14 days last month and vowed to try to further savings to mitigate the forced days off.

Hagel is expected to announce his decision Tuesday afternoon during a town hall meeting at the MARK Center in Alexandria, Va.

"He's reducing the number of furlough days from 14 to 11 and tried to reduce the number even more," the senior Defense official said. "But after several rounds of meetings on sequestration and asking for different furlough scenarios, he decided that we really don't have a choice but to save money for the remainder of FY13 to support military readiness, operations, and training."

"No one is happy with having to make this tough decision, especially him," the official added

Hagel will also allow exemptions for thousands of workers, The Associated Press first reported, including Navy employees working at shipyards.

The issue of furloughs has been looming over the Pentagon for months as defense leaders tried to find a way to pay for about $43 billion in cuts from sequestration, which began going into effect on March 1.

Navy Secretary Ray Mabus said he found savings within his department and would be able to avoid furloughing his civilian employees. But Hagel appeared to strike that down, saying the cuts would be implemented across the services in a "one team, one fight" approach.
linkey---> Pentagon furloughs planned at 11 days - Stephanie Gaskell - POLITICO.com
 

NTNG

Member
In related news, NAWCAD provided a grant of $250,000 to the local school system, to help open the "Southern MD Flight Academy" at the tech center, as part of the local STEM program. How is NAWCAD allowed to "grant" taxpayer funds? I understand investing in your future, but when thermostats are locked, coffee pots secured, grass not cut, and all the other BS that is being tossed at us, $250,000 ( one quarter MILLION dollars) to " learn about aviation in an immersive game based learning environment" seems a little much. How many furlough days does that grant equate to? How many other areas do DOD funds get poured into like this, that dont make the news?
 
Top