Sick of Faucism

GURPS

INGSOC
PREMO Member

Dr. Fauci Makes Long-Disproven Claim About COVID Lockdowns





The amount of information we have on this pandemic is mindblowing and has been the subject of countless studies, and for Fauci to claim unequivocally that the lockdowns prevented infections, hospitalizations and deaths is flat-out wrong.

Since fairly early in the pandemic, we’ve known that the lockdowns did very little to slow the spread of COVID. A study from July 2020, which was published in The Lancet and based on data from 50 countries, found no reduction in COVID-related mortality. Another study published a few months later relied on data from 160 countries and reached a similar conclusion. There have been many studies since that have also reached similar conclusions, including a Johns Hopkins University study released last month.

Despite all the data and studies suggesting the lockdowns weren’t effective, Fauci has been vehemently pro-lockdown. In fact, in the fall of 2020, Fauci orchestrated a “quick and devastating” takedown of The Great Barrington Declaration, a document authored by experts who advocated for herd immunity to stop the pandemic and “focused protection” for the most vulnerable populations over universal lockdowns.

The health officials in charge of our nation’s pandemic response never wanted to engage with those who held different ideas for getting us through the pandemic. Last year, Fauci had the arrogance to claim that anyone criticizing him was dangerous because he represents science.

Fauci will never admit the lockdowns were ineffective, and he’ll never admit that he was wrong. But, as a government official, he’ll always be on the side of whatever involves controlling the population.


look at the numbers for yourself

 

GURPS

INGSOC
PREMO Member

‘The View’ Host Says She Considered Suing Trump After In-Laws Died Of COVID





“It was very painful and that’s the reason why I had to do something, but I know I alienated a lot of the Trump people, maybe, in fact, all of the Trump people,” Fauci said. “I had to go to the podium and say, I’m sorry, I disagree with you, but his staff declared war on me, and war on me was they did sort of opposition research on me, and sent out information that I didn’t know what I was talking about. So my position in the White House became extremely uncomfortable, and, in fact, untenable because I kept on telling the truth.”

“He also agreed that if the former administration had focused on public health instead of the politics, a lot of lives could have been saved,” Goldberg continued.

🤣

Convicted murderer Arnett Thomas did file a class-action lawsuit against the former president in 2021, accusing him of using the American people as essentially guinea pigs in a massive experiment on herd immunity.

“Trump did not kill just one person on Fifth Avenue in New York City and got away with that murder, he is responsible for the deaths of hundreds of thousands of people across the expanse of America,” Thomas claimed in the suit.



I'm sure the claim will be


Trump should have locked down the country


even though the Federal Gov lacks the authority to do so .... or other extreme measures - and at the same time for 4 yrs claiming Trump was a fascist dictator

Now Fauci claims he was persecuted by Trump
 

GURPS

INGSOC
PREMO Member

s the Fauci-Mengele comparison out of bounds?


By Lloyd Billingsley


Fox News has parted company with Laura Logan, the journalist contends, for relaying viewers’ comments that Dr. Anthony Fauci does not represent science, as the Biden adviser has claimed, and instead represents Nazi doctor Josef Mengele. Logan, formerly with CBS News, had in mind the fallout from COVID, but a different context might be more appropriate.

Josef Mengele earned a medical degree in 1938, the same year he joined the Nazis’ Waffen SS, where he volunteered for medical service. At Nazi concentration camps, Mengele would decide which arrivals would live or die.

At Auschwitz, Mengele conducted agonizing and lethal experiments on Jewish and Gypsy twins, most of them children. In his review of The Real Anthony Fauci, by Robert F. Kennedy Jr., economist Thomas DiLorenzo calls out Fauci’s “Dr. Mengele–style ‘experiments,’” which also took place on unwilling subjects.

Fauci’s National Institute for Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) provided funding for the Incarnation Children’s Center (ICC) in New York as an outpatient clinic for HIV-positive children. The city’s Administration for Children’s Services (ACS) offered up children under its care, nearly all of them African American or Hispanic, for secretive drug experimentation. The BBC told the story in the 2004 documentary Guinea Pig Kids.

As biochemist Dr. David Rasnick explained, children as young as three months were given “cocktails” of drugs with dangerous side effects. Rasnick described Didanosene as “very dangerous,” and Nevirapene as “dangerous and debilitating... horrible and painful and also lethal.” The children were also given Zidovdine, another name for AZT (azidothymidine), a DNA chain terminator that cures and prevents nothing.

ICC nurse Jacklyn Hoerger was ordered to give kids regular and sometimes large doses of AZT. According to Hoerger some 80 children died in the experiments. For further reading see Poison by Prescription: The AZT Story, by John Lauritsen

Fauci’s NIAID funded agonizing and deadly experiments on unwilling subjects, so DiLorenzo was not out of line in his comparison with Josef Mengele. As Kennedy shows, Fauci’s NIAID also conducts drug trials in Africa, where subjects can be unwitting as to adverse consequences and less likely to draw attention from American journalists.
 

GURPS

INGSOC
PREMO Member

Fauci Suggests Judge Did Not Have Authority To Overturn Mask Mandate










“This is completely dangerous & insane,” tweeted WMAL host Vince Coglianese. “Fauci is declaring the CDC above judicial scrutiny. Dangerous lunacy. It’s long past time for Fauci to go.”

The director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases also sparked a backlash last week when he said that governments use lockdowns to “get people vaccinated” as he discussed China’s heavily restrictive coronavirus lockdowns.

Fauci said that China has a “number of problems,” noting that the country’s strict lockdowns would never be able to be implemented in the United States, “although that prevents the spread of infection.”

“I remember early on they were saying, and I think accurately, that they were doing better than almost anyone else,” Fauci said.

“But lockdown has its consequences,” he continued. “You use lockdowns to get people vaccinated so that when you open up, you won’t have a surge of infections, because you are dealing with an immunologically naïve population, to the virus, because they’ve not really been exposed because of the lockdown.”
 

GURPS

INGSOC
PREMO Member

Fauci's Complaints on 'Dangerous Precedent' of Mask Mandate Ruling Exposes a Disturbing Sense of Entitlement



In multiple interviews, Dr. Anthony Fauci has weighed in on the Monday ruling from United States District Judge Kathryn Kimball Mizelle, which struck down the travel mask mandate. President Joe Biden's Department of Justice (DOJ) has decided to appeal Judge Mizelle's ruling. The Centers for Disease Control (CDC) has also told the DOJ to reinstate the mandate.


Speaking with CBS News' Robert Costa, Dr. Fauci lamented that a judge would dare to rule on the mask mandate as it applied to the CDC overstepping its authority, including when it comes to the Administrative Procedure Act (APA). Costa had asked Fauci "does the CDC, with all respect, have any power anymore if one judge can say 'no thanks' to its mandates," expressing a rather narrow-minded oversimplification of the issue.

Fauci emphasized that they were "worried," as he noted "we're worried about a precedent that would be a dangerous precedent. The CDC has the capability, through a large number of trained epidemiologists and scientists, to be able to make projections and make recommendations. Far more than a judge with no experience in public health," Fauci claimed.
 

GURPS

INGSOC
PREMO Member

Fauci Lets His Megalomania Show




The Biden administration’s chief medical adviser made last year what C.S. Lewis might have called a “lunatic, liar, or lord” statement when he essentially claimed to be the embodiment of science. (Hint: he’s a bit of the first, all of the second, but wants to be the third.) Five days ago, this man went even further, declaring that the executive branch should be free to act outside of boundaries put in place to prevent an all-powerful presidency.

He’s a menace. We’d all be better off if he were a Washington Nationals batboy rather than a powerful government functionary and influential media darling.

Anthony Fauci – we won’t grant him the honor of the title of “Dr.” because he’s far more bureaucrat than healer – who heads the National Institute of Allergies and Infectious Diseases is not science, even though in June 2021 he said his critics, of whom there are many but not enough, are “really criticizing science because I represent science.”

But he does have the mindset of an authoritarian.
 

GURPS

INGSOC
PREMO Member

Fauci wants courts to defer to public health experts for 'public health decisions'



"The point that I was making [was] that this is a public health decision, and I think it's a bad precedent when decisions about public health issues are made by people, be they judges or what have you, that don't have experience or expertise in public health," Fauci told Fox News’ Neil Cavuto.

Fauci clarified comments made on Thursday about a U.S. district court judge striking down the travel mask mandate, noting while he respects judicial decisions, "this is a public health issue."

"I wasn't at all defying the authority of a judge because when the judge makes a decision, you abide by that decision," Fauci said. "I was concerned about the principle of having nonpublic health people making public health decisions."





Judges should be making decisions on the rule of law ... that includes over reaching public health technocrats
 

GURPS

INGSOC
PREMO Member

Fauci thinks arrogant technocrats should trump the rule of law




Anthony Fauci was “surprised and disappointed” by last week’s ruling against the mask mandate for travelers issued by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. “This is a CDC issue,” President Joe Biden’s top medical adviser told CNN. “It should not have been a court issue.”

Fauci, who objects to federalism as well as judicial review, embodies the mild-mannered arrogance of technocrats who assume their scientific expertise trumps the rule of law. Because they believe they know what is best for us, they are dismayed by any attempt to limit their influence or restrain their power.

Fauci did vaguely criticize the substance of US District Judge Kathryn Kimball Mizelle’s decision, calling her reasoning “not sound” and “not particularly firm.” But his main point was that she had no business determining whether the CDC had complied with the law because courts should not be “getting involved in things that are unequivocally public-health decisions.”

White House Press Secretary Jen Psaki concurred: “Public-health decisions shouldn’t be made by the courts. They should be made by public-health experts.”

But Mizelle did not make a public-health decision; she made a legal decision, based on her understanding of the relevant statute. Contrary to Psaki’s implication, courts are not only authorized but obligated to make such decisions, as she surely would have conceded had Mizelle ruled in the CDC’s favor.

[clip]

If there is “no place for the courts” to assess the legality of disease-control edicts, as Fauci maintains, it follows that the Supreme Court erred not only by blocking the CDC’s nationwide eviction moratorium but even by taking up the issue. Evidently, it also should have stayed out of the dispute over the federal vaccination-or-testing requirement for private employees, which it likewise deemed illegal.

Fauci’s impatience with legal niceties has been apparent for some time. “The states are very often given a considerable amount of leeway in doing things the way they want to do it,” he complained in a 2020 interview with BBC Radio 4, “as opposed to in response to federal mandates, which are relatively rarely given.”

The “leeway” that bothers Fauci is required by the Constitution, which leaves states with the primary responsibility for addressing public-health threats under a broad “police power” that the federal government was never given. So his beef is not simply with the way COVID-19 policy happened to play out in the United States; it is an objection to our system of government.
 
Last edited:

GURPS

INGSOC
PREMO Member





From the Reliable Sources newsletter:

The nation’s top doctor will no longer be attending the White House Correspondents Association Dinner this Saturday. Dr. Anthony Fauci had been invited to attend as a guest of ABC News and had planned on going, sources familiar with the matter told Kaitlan Collins and me. But he recently decided to abandon those plans and inform ABC that he would no longer attend because of an individual assessment of his own personal risk, the sources said. Fauci’s decision comes amid concerns that the event could become a superspreader like the annual Gridiron Dinner held weeks ago, even though the WHCA is taking all the expected Covid precautions. Fauci’s decision also comes as the omicron sub-variant sweeps the nation…


If it’s not safe for 81-year-old Anthony Fauci, the nation’s top expert on all this, how is it safe from 79-year-old Joe Biden to go?




 

GURPS

INGSOC
PREMO Member

Fauci Went Maskless at Correspondents’ Dinner Pre-Party and That’s Only the Third-Worst Part of It



After keeping as many Americans as possible cowering behind slave masks throughout the Plandemic, Anthony Fauci attended yesterday’s White House Correspondents’ Dinner pre-party without a mask. The crowded room would have been called a super-spreader event if there were Republicans there, but since it was mostly leftist politicians and corporate media folks, they didn’t even pretend to social distance.

Today, Pandemic Panic Theater has diminished so it’s reasonable to expect such displays. In fact, we would be lambasting them if the progressive glamour crowd had been wearing slave masks at all now that they’ve been essentially debunked as a means of stopping anything other than freedom. That’s why this is only the third-worst example of hypocrisy on display surrounding Fauci.

The two biggest despicable actions are tossups as to which is worse. On one hand, you have the class-separation fully invoked since all of the staff were forced to don slave masks.


 

GURPS

INGSOC
PREMO Member

Fauci's researchers find better antibody response from natural immunity than Moderna vaccine



Amonth before America's top infectious disease bureaucrat conceded that mRNA vaccines offer only short-lived protection against COVID-19, Anthony Fauci's researchers at the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease (NIAID) offered a possible explanation why.

These vaccines target COVID's spike protein, whereas natural immunity recognizes the whole of the virus, including the nucleocapsid protein that envelops the RNA core.






 

GURPS

INGSOC
PREMO Member

Six Reasons Dr. Fauci Needs to Go Now


He’s a partisan hack.​

Last year, Fauci was accused of violating the Hatch Act — which prohibits government employees from “us[ing] his official authority or influence for the purpose of interfering with or affecting the result of an election.” The complaint, filed by Protect the Public’s Trust (PPT), a non-profit organization, said Fauci violated the Hatch Act by conducting an interview with the Washington Post days before the presidential election in November 2020, in which he made political statements about the election and the two major party candidates, Trump and Biden.

“Dr. Anthony Fauci’s evaluation of the two candidates running for President during his interview with The Washington Post on October 30, 2020 demonstrated a clear intent to use his influence as one of the nation’s leading COVID-19 experts to affect the outcome of the coming national election,” the complaint read.

He’s since been highly critical of Trump, accusing him of responding poorly to the pandemic, even though Fauci was the architect of the nation’s response.

He lied about COVID’s origins.​

He lied about funding the Wuhan lab.​


He pushed universal masking.​

In the early days of the pandemic, Fauci infamously told Americans they didn’t need to wear masks. Later, he pushed for universal masking and double-masking, even though he knew that there was no data indicating that it offered superior protection.

However, despite his evangelism for face masks, he knew they weren’t effective at protecting people from COVID.

“Masks are really for infected people to protect them from spreading infection to people who are not infected rather than protecting uninfected people from acquiring infection,” Fauci wrote on Feb. 5, 2020. “The typical mask you buy in the drug store is not really effective in keeping out [the] virus, which is small enough to pass through the material.”

He lied about herd immunity.​

His division funded cruel puppy experiments.​

 

GURPS

INGSOC
PREMO Member

Fauci Admits Children Don't Actually Need to be Boosted



Although the fully vaccinated and doubled boosted Dr. Fauci had to testify virtually at a Senate hearing due to contracting the Wuhan Coronavirus, he was still well enough to go neck and neck with Sen. Rand Paul once again over the infamous Covid pandemic that was fueled and funded by the doctor himself.

Paul asked Fauci if he was familiar with the fact that no studies showed a reduction in deaths or hospitalizations for children who had received boosters.

To which, the doctor acknowledged that there’s not actually enough data to support the need for children to get boosted.

“Right now, there's not enough data that has been accumulated, Senator Paul, to indicate that that's the case,” Fauci started to say before Paul interrupted.

“So there are no studies. And Americans should all know this. There are no studies on children showing a reduction in hospitalization or death with taking a booster,” Paul reiterated.
 

GURPS

INGSOC
PREMO Member

CDC & NIH/NIAID (Fauci, Francis Collins, Walensky, Bourla-Pfizer, Bancel-Modeerna) LIED & knew they were lying on natural immunity; they knew cellular immunity (memory T & B-cell) was 'more potent



Scientific consensus on the COVID-19 pandemic: we need to act now

She and they duplicitously wrote: “Furthermore, there is no evidence for lasting protective immunity to SARS-CoV-2 following natural infection”:

Walensky and the other co-authors lied brazenly to us all! She knew this statement was completely false.

The CDC, NIH, NIAID, Drs. Francis Collins, Anthony Fauci, and Rochelle Walensky et al. all lied to you the society and anyone listening, and they knew they were duplicitous and deceitful and misleading and continued to lie to scare you and force you into compliance to take the COVID injection that turned out to be ineffective and unsafe. They even knew that the COVID inoculation (especially the mRNA gene delivery platforms) was not needed, and their actions and policies from failed lockdowns, to failed school closures, to failed business closures, to failed shelter-in-place policies, to failed mask mandates and to the failed non-sterilizing (non-neutralizing vaccinal antibodies; non-neutralizing Abs prevent the virus from entering the cells and replicating) vaccines, have severely harmed Americans, especially our children. They killed people with their baseless, unscientific lockdown lunatic policies.

These lockdown lunacy policies killed Americans, beyond anything the virus ever did. They knew that these mRNA injections could not stop infection, replication, and transmission and as such would be subjected to selection pressure by the sub-optimal immune vaccinal antibodies (Abs) placed directly on the infectiousness of the virus (the spike protein). They knew one month post March 2020 that COVID-19 was amenable to risk stratification and that baseline risk was prognostic on severity of outcome/mortality. They knew because we, I told them so. We/I wrote it many times, we spoke about it.
 
Top