So now they us want to re-write history

itsbob

I bowl overhand
But the balck units were depot oo support, so the chances were slim that the Japanese depicted in the film had seen any, and since it was writen/ recorded in the Japanese perspective, seems logical that movie would not have had any black people in it.
 

Major Bawls

New Member
Correct

I was wonderign about that, I had the impression that African Americans in the 1940’s only served in the Marine Corps the same way some women did, i.e. clerks.

They weren’t allowed in Marine Expeditionary Units (MEUs) or the Marine Aircraft Groups (MAGs) which is what went to fight in the island hopping campaign.

For Eastwood to have included an African-American, he would have had to rewrite history, something he and the authors of the book tried very hard to stop. Kinda like how, when Lee made Malcom X, he sorta conveniently forgot that whole part about X’s transformation, shortly before his assassination, from radical to more reasonable activist. He chose to completely downplay this aspect of Malcom X in order to perpetuate the militant “by any means necessary” character that he wanted him to remain.

Given that there were like 40,000 troops on the Island and both movies only depicted limited units, iirc. Statistically, I see no reason to include a “token” minority unless there were historical evidence that one of the major characters in the story were indeed black. The odds would be against it.

And also, weren’t all units segregated at that time? Unless an all-black unit was the focus of the story, including random blacks in the ranks would have been ahistorical

In part...and I commend your insight as to the historical nature.

Oh and I believe you will not find the word ahistorical anywhere...
 
Top