Solution for c/s.

Roberta

OLD WISE ONE
JPC sr said:
:jameo: I do not say that we can know what Eddie Murphy thinks as I do not read minds.

So he did not say much in the quote you posted:

"Notice he said he will continue to honor his responsibilities as a father."

IMO, his responsibility is to fight the injustice in Court and pay that woman nothing.

It would be great if he got some big lawyers to fight the child support injustice.

But I think that Murphy does not know how to fight the injustice as I know how,
and the chicken-crap lawyers have all sold-out to the injustice too so he will not get help.

I suppose he will be forced to accept paying some half a million or more per year instead of fighting.

The info you are seeing here from me is far beyond what is available to them there. :whistle:

SPRAY PAINTING COURT HOUSES, really got you SOME WHERE!!!!!!!!!!! :killingme :killingme
 

This_person

Well-Known Member
hvp05 said:
We covered that days ago. :rolleyes:
Sorry, I was more interested in seeing him try to defend the emotional abandonment than the financial one. He can't defend either, but since he did both, I thought it would be interesting to see him try.
By the way...
Thanks, but the name is not "HPV"; that is something else entirely. :twitch:
Dyslexia strikes again.
And we have addressed the inconsistencies between his purported beliefs (at the start of this thread) and his son's case... So he will address his son's case only to the point of declaring what his son provides willingly. Then he becomes tight-lipped. What's funny is, I would accept even a simple answer; something like, "Yes, he sends his daughter cash," or "Yes, he buys her clothes,"... anything. I'd have to believe it because I can't easily disprove the claim. But even JPC, pathological liar that he is, can not seem to bring himself to lie about that. Interesting, I think.
As you say, it has been covered. He does not believe that a non-custodial parent has any obligation, moral or ethical (and doesn't agree with the legal, so chooses to ignore the legal), to provide for a child. I think he would be ashamed of his son if his son actually did something for the child.

I wasn't really asking about his son's case, though. I wanted to hear from him what, of the actions he has been willing to share with us he was proud of. Jimmy made the comment that he was proud of his son, and I was curious what it was that made him proud of such an abusively neglectful, criminal load on society.

You're right about the lying for his son, it's an interesting bit honor on his part. However, it's my guess that he thinks somehow this forum could be used against his son in his son's valiant (sic) fight against "big daddy gov".
 

JPC sr

James P. Cusick Sr.
Scofflaw and Personal Responsibility.

Roberta said:
SPRAY PAINTING COURT HOUSES, really got you SOME WHERE!!!!!!!!!!! :killingme :killingme
:whistle: It really was very effective in my opinion.

But it was mostly self empowering as that was my first official crime.

That is "official" by my standards.

After that I was free to fight the thievery by any and all efforts.

The child support turns parents into criminals and I chose to be an offencive criminal instead of retreat.

That first spray painting of the Court House was a big turning moment for me. :howdy:
 

JPC sr

James P. Cusick Sr.
Scofflaw and Personal Responsibility.

This_person said:
How was it effective - it made you "free" to be a bigger criminal?
:whistle: That is what I said and that is what I meant, duh.

When there are unjust laws and immoral gov then being a criminal is the right way.

Before that Court House spray paint I was still willing to pay the child support as I thought it was the rightful law, but the c/s law left me on the streets to die and I was pushed into immoral crime or civil disobediance and I chose to fight back.

It was a big moment for me and my destiny. :elaine:
 

This_person

Well-Known Member
JPC sr said:
That is what I said and that is what I meant, duh.
You start saying "duh" a lot when you're proven stupid. You must have had that said to you a lot so it makes you feel good to say it to others - some sort of superiority or power thing......
Before that Court House spray paint I was still willing to pay the child support as I thought it was the rightful law, but the c/s law left me on the streets to die and I was pushed into immoral crime or civil disobediance and I chose to fight back. It was a big moment for me and my destiny.
So, before you spray painted verbal idiocy on the court house walls deriding the child support laws, you thought they were "rightful law", but once you spray painted how unjust you thought the laws were, you decided they were unjust?

Do you even make sense to you?

Have you ever come to grips with the concept that it wasn't the law that left you "on the streets", as all your needs were met and overflowing, but that it was your desertion of your family and poor work history that did it? That if you'd chosen to put the effort into working for a living, and providing for your child, that you put into "fighting back" against the idea that you are responsible as a parent to your child, you wouldn't have been "on the streets to die"?

Because, after all, there are no hungry people, on the streets left to die. That's just slander, and doesn't exist! :twitch:
 

hvp05

Methodically disorganized
This_person said:
Because, after all, there are no hungry people, on the streets left to die. That's just slander, and doesn't exist! :twitch:
That's the first response that came to my mind. :lmao: I'll have to be faster next time.
 

This_person

Well-Known Member
This_person said:
Have you ever come to grips with the concept that it wasn't the law that left you "on the streets", but that it was your desertion of your family and poor work history that did it? That, if you'd chosen to put the effort into working for a living and providing for your child that you put into "fighting back" against the idea that you are responsible as a parent to your child, you wouldn't have been "on the streets to die"?
This was a real question, Jimmy. Goes to the "personal responsibility" discussion that's underlined all of our conversation.
 

This_person

Well-Known Member
JPC sr said:
This_person said:
My serious question is, do you see that the government had nothing to do with the predicament you were in, that it was ALL your doing?

Do you understand that spraypainting walls like an undisciplined three year old is not being a responsible citizen whose voice will be listened to?

Do you understand that you got so far in debt with child support because you shirked your parental duties, not because child support was expected?
:jameo: No to first, no to second and no to third question.
This_person said:
The list goes on and on, but it boils down to: do you take responsibility for your actions, or do you just blame others for what you are? Meaning, do others make you what you are, or do you make you what you are?
:jameo: I take all responsibility for all my actions,

but I take no responsibility for the actions of other or of the thieving child support.
:elaine:
Okay, you actually are oblivious to reality.

YOUR actions are what caused you to be in debt. YOUR actions are what caused you to go to jail. YOUR actions are why you are who you are and why you had the life you've had.

Since you can't see that, you are truly hopeless in ever becoming a functioning memeber of society or useful as a human. You'll continue to be a load in every single way, not contributing - and actually hurting the world with the way you speak out your idiocy and lies, and the way you advise your ex-wife's step-son to act.

Barring any more direct attacks on me, good bye, Jimmy. I've said this before, but I allowed myself to think I could come back and help you. When you're ready for help, I'll be glad to help you. But, until you recognize how much you've hurt people, how much you've ruined your son's life, how you're hurting people now, and (most importantly) how much you've wasted your own life, you can't be helped, and I'll stop trying to help you.
 

JPC sr

James P. Cusick Sr.
Scofflaw and Personal Responsibility.

This_person said:
Okay, you actually are oblivious to reality.

YOUR actions are what caused you to be in debt. YOUR actions are what caused you to go to jail. YOUR actions are why you are who you are and why you had the life you've had.

Since you can't see that, you are truly hopeless in ever becoming a functioning memeber of society or useful as a human. You'll continue to be a load in every single way, not contributing - and actually hurting the world with the way you speak out your idiocy and lies, and the way you advise your ex-wife's step-son to act.

Barring any more direct attacks on me, good bye, Jimmy. I've said this before, but I allowed myself to think I could come back and help you. When you're ready for help, I'll be glad to help you. But, until you recognize how much you've hurt people, how much you've ruined your son's life, how you're hurting people now, and (most importantly) how much you've wasted your own life, you can't be helped, and I'll stop trying to help you
.
:whistle: Amen. :larry:
 

Pandora

New Member
I have nothing to add to this thread or topic, but I do have one request JPC, you are ruining the :whistle: and :larry: smilies with your constant use.

My brain has now associated those smilies to you and they are somewhat annoying to me now. :bawl: Thanks a lot! I really liked those smilies until you came along. :mad:
 

JPC sr

James P. Cusick Sr.
Scofflaw and Personal Responsibility.

Pandora said:
I have nothing to add to this thread or topic, but I do have one request JPC, you are ruining the :whistle: and :larry: smilies with your constant use.

My brain has now associated those smilies to you and they are somewhat annoying to me now. :bawl: Thanks a lot! I really liked those smilies until you came along. :mad:
:whistle: Well I do understand that and I even agree,

because even I have associated those smilies with myself.

They are sticking in my brain too.

I just use them to decorate the post and for paragraphs but most mean nothing to me.

Some time back the administration changed the smilie selection so I started using other icons but many complained about the change and the administration brought back the old ones and I was stuck.

But for the record that one smilie really rocks = :larry:
 

High EGT

Gort! Klaatu barada nikto
Argusation:
Describes a particularly long-winded argument that never achieves the critical mass to explode and finish, but goes on and on and on.
Example: I wouldn't go in there. Your parents are having another argusation.
Pretty much sums up this thread
 
Top