How come? Because Starbucks supports gay issues?It's not just coffee, SMC removed Starbucks coffee several years ago and replaced it with a Fair Trade alternative Fair Trade Coffee, Tea, Chocolate, Almonds, Olive Oil and Gifts
How come? Because Starbucks supports gay issues?It's not just coffee, SMC removed Starbucks coffee several years ago and replaced it with a Fair Trade alternative Fair Trade Coffee, Tea, Chocolate, Almonds, Olive Oil and Gifts
And I might ask you the same question - why the outrage at CFA and not SMC?
I have no vested interest in whether or not students can easily get a chicken sandwich on campus. Blue Wind has better food anyway. What I do have a vested interest in is activists not being able to dictate to the rest of us what choices we can and cannot make.
What would your reaction be if Bob Jones University (or wherever) pulled Starbucks off campus because they support gay causes? I mean, it's just coffee, right?
It's not just coffee, SMC removed Starbucks coffee several years ago and replaced it with a Fair Trade alternative Fair Trade Coffee, Tea, Chocolate, Almonds, Olive Oil and Gifts

I was going to eat this apple here on my desk, but after looking up the number on the sticker found that the apple used to grow the tree that it came from came from a company in guatamala that, before it was a seed company, distributed macrame from a small company in south africa that, get this, trafficked PURE unicorn tears. No ####. I immediately threw it at the nearest chik fil A eat more chicken mascot.. two birds, one totally offensive stone.

I mean, Chick-Fil-A was always ~3$ for the sandwiches that they sold on campus which isn't exactly dollar menu, but the new offerings are definitely a few dollars more. Ahhhh I love sweet poetic justice!
Also, it might be worth pointing out that Chick-Fil-A sandwiches were only sold on Thursdays from 10AM-2PM or so. They were not a major institution here. Yet the whiny ass liberals had them booted for more expensive sammiches! Typical democrats in training!

Aren't "pure" unicorn tears outlawed by the UN?yeah, vrai
You have obv forgotten that every single food item has the ability to be outrageously offensive.
I was going to eat this apple here on my desk, but after looking up the number on the sticker found that the apple used to grow the tree that it came from came from a company in guatamala that, before it was a seed company, distributed macrame from a small company in south africa that, get this, trafficked PURE unicorn tears. No ####. I immediately threw it at the nearest chik fil A eat more chicken mascot.. two birds, one totally offensive stone.
I never said I was outraged, or even upset. I just think it's ridiculous to point the finger at SMC and completely ignore the actions of CFA. Especially if we factor in the number of people impacted and the severity of the impact of the actions.And I might ask you the same question - why the outrage at CFA and not SMC?
We are in agreement here.What I do have a vested interest in is activists not being able to dictate to the rest of us what choices we can and cannot make.
Bob Jones is a private entity, aren't they?What would your reaction be if Bob Jones University (or wherever) pulled Starbucks off campus because they support gay causes? I mean, it's just coffee, right?
The number of people directly impacted by CFA's actions is...zero. The severity of impact is....zero. Gays are making great strides in gaining equality, much more so than ever before in history. So clearly CFA donating money to traditional family groups is not hurting anyone.I never said I was outraged, or even upset. I just think it's ridiculous to point the finger at SMC and completely ignore the actions of CFA. Especially if we factor in the number of people impacted and the severity of the impact of the actions.
Exactly.The point is that SMC removed a business entity whose principles and values they don't agree with.....in the spirit of diversity and tolerance. And THAT is your irony alert for the day. WOOT!
Which one?So inalienable rights, not so much?
I do not agree. By giving money to groups that try to reinforce the idea that there is something wrong with being gay, they help create a hostile environment for gay people. Is it directly measurable? Probably not.The number of people directly impacted by CFA's actions is...zero. The severity of impact is....zero. Gays are making great strides in gaining equality, much more so than ever before in history. So clearly CFA donating money to traditional family groups is not hurting anyone.
Homosexual Behavior & Pedophilia said:...one of the primary goals of the homosexual rights movement is to abolish all age of consent laws and to eventually recognize pedophiles as the 'prophets' of a new sexual order.
Homosexual Behavior & Pedophilia said:Gaining access to children has been a long-term goal of the homosexual movement.
Are you sure that is not simply the inevitable result of the continuous agressive push and creeping successes of organizations like NAMBLA?I do not agree. By giving money to groups that try to reinforce the idea that there is something wrong with being gay, they help create a hostile environment for gay people. Is it directly measurable? Probably not.
The Family Research Council in particular attempts to demonize gays by saying they are really pedophiles. They do so in publications and provide legal briefs and training for attorneys to promote these ideas. Here are a few choice quotes:
I'm pretty sure if Mr. Cathy read one or two of your posts he wouldn't want you in any of his establishments either.CFA is a privately owned company whose business philosophy is based on good old, fundamentalist Christian values, from hiring Christian employees to donating to Christian organizations whose mission is to relegate people who are gay to the back of the bus. The owners of CFA say that they love and respect everyone, including those who disagree with CFA's devout Christianity. Of course they love everyone, a buck is a buck!
Interestingly though, CFA's strict hiring practices were tested in a 2002 lawsuit after a Muslim employee sued them after he was fired for refusing to pray to Jesus during a training session. Now on that note and knowing how many of you feel about anyone who is different, especially Muslims, I am fairly confident if CFA was a Muslim owned business run and based on strict Muslim values, you folks would be having an absolute fit. Frankly, I don't support CFA and I don't eat their food nor would I support a business who loved everyone but believed in slavery or sexism.
I say good going SMC students and if any students feel deprived or discriminated against, let them drive to our local CFA. It's one thing having diverse religious clubs/groups on campus and another having a major corporation whose profits, in part, are used to support bigotry.
Just like it's my money to chose to spend at CF or not, it's CF'Smoney to.spend how they want.I thought the initial ariticles appeared to make it look private, but I just looked into it is owed/operated by St. Marys College
I would say both are wrong.
And if both are wrong, why the outrage at the SMC students and not Chik-Filet?
I don't understand, there are not any apples that are made from unicorn tears because unicorns do not exist. If you wanted to boycott this company for using unicorn tears and encourage others from supporting this unicorn tear company, I don't see the issue (other than the lack of unicorn existence). I mean I understand your sarcasm, but I don't completely understand its relevance, please elaborate further?yeah, vrai
You have obv forgotten that every single food item has the ability to be outrageously offensive.
I was going to eat this apple here on my desk, but after looking up the number on the sticker found that the apple used to grow the tree that it came from came from a company in guatamala that, before it was a seed company, distributed macrame from a small company in south africa that, get this, trafficked PURE unicorn tears. No ####. I immediately threw it at the nearest chik fil A eat more chicken mascot.. two birds, one totally offensive stone.
What is the poetic justice? I don't think anyone cared that much about the price, the product is still selling out within hours. I don't understand what supporting local businesses has to do with political ideologies. Please explain further.
I don't understand what you mean. I explained why SMC removed Starbucks. If Bob Jones University wants to remove Starbucks because they support pro-gay initiatives then that is their prerogative, I don't really care. I was just commenting on why SMC removed Starbucks several years ago.How come? Because Starbucks supports gay issues?
Wirelessly posted
I'm SURE you know this but I feel I must point out that most of the students (including myself) I knew at SMCM when I attended (math dept, admittedly very different from te arts depts) were there on their own dime via loans and/or their own jobs.
Just sayin'![]()

There is an age requirement for voting, yes? Is it written in the constitution? No. Only the age requirement to qualify as potus. So, where do those numbers come from, voting eligible at 18? Wherever they came from, it is too low. Especially for children who get all worked up over a chicken joint that, apparently, is scared of what people do in their bedrooms. If they really care about gay rights, at 18, Uncle Sam will give them a rifle and transportation and they can go kill people who REALLY have something against homosexuals yet screw little boys for pleasure.I have decided to defend St. Mary's.
You're right. And that 9.1% of the country currently unemployed and not paying taxes shouldn't be able to vote or voice their opinion either. I totally forgot about the part of the first amendment written in invisible ink stipulating that you must be financial invested in something for constitutional protections to kick in.
Student loans are like the housing market; the implied federal backing via Sallie Mae. Sallie Mae, like Freddie Mac, was created to help people who otherwise couldn't get money for school and homes. This, of course, adds costs. Take away Sallie and the easy money dries up because the taxpayer would no longer be on the hook.Listen, dad, I am 22
That's akin to "get your government hands off my Medicare." The easy loans come from private lenders. Government loans are capped at reasonable amounts, it's simply not possible to end up with $100,000 in government loans. .
