NorthJersey.com reported Wednesday that “the comparisons are not only offensive but also inaccurate, say Muslims.” One of the principal reasons why is that Islam isn’t even pro-life: “Under most interpretations of Islamic law, abortion is permitted within the first 120 days.” The report asserted that “today, some American states have tougher abortion laws than Afghanistan, which allows the procedure if the mother’s life is at risk or if the child will be born with severe disabilities.”
Accordingly, the founder of the New York-based Women’s Islamic Initiative in Spirituality and Equality, Daisy Khan (whose husband, Faisal Abdul Rauf, was a prime mover behind the ill-fated Ground Zero Mosque initiative a few years ago), declared: “We cannot preach women’s rights to other countries when we are stepping back the rights [American] women have to control their own reproduction.”
And we especially cannot preach abortion, in the view of Khan and her allies, by likening its foes to Muslims who follow Islamic law down to the last detail. Sahar Aziz of Rutgers University Law School complains that “liberals are seeking to protect women’s right to privacy and autonomy over her body. They are perversely doing so by maligning Islam as misogynistic by comparing the opposition to Sharia.”
Abed Awad, whom NorthJersey.com says is “a national expert in Islamic law,” without explaining what exactly constitutes a “national expert,” “said he has grown frustrated with the spread of misinformation about Sharia over two decades, most recently with the abortion debate.” Ah, there’s that word again. If only we had, say, a Disinformation Governance Board to go after the miscreants who spread this alleged misinformation! “Sharia,” says Awad, “when it comes to the right to terminate a pregnancy, is far more egalitarian and progressive.” So comparing pro-lifers to the Taliban is just the wrong look; after all, who could possibly be more egalitarian and progressive than the Taliban?
Accordingly, the founder of the New York-based Women’s Islamic Initiative in Spirituality and Equality, Daisy Khan (whose husband, Faisal Abdul Rauf, was a prime mover behind the ill-fated Ground Zero Mosque initiative a few years ago), declared: “We cannot preach women’s rights to other countries when we are stepping back the rights [American] women have to control their own reproduction.”
And we especially cannot preach abortion, in the view of Khan and her allies, by likening its foes to Muslims who follow Islamic law down to the last detail. Sahar Aziz of Rutgers University Law School complains that “liberals are seeking to protect women’s right to privacy and autonomy over her body. They are perversely doing so by maligning Islam as misogynistic by comparing the opposition to Sharia.”
Abed Awad, whom NorthJersey.com says is “a national expert in Islamic law,” without explaining what exactly constitutes a “national expert,” “said he has grown frustrated with the spread of misinformation about Sharia over two decades, most recently with the abortion debate.” Ah, there’s that word again. If only we had, say, a Disinformation Governance Board to go after the miscreants who spread this alleged misinformation! “Sharia,” says Awad, “when it comes to the right to terminate a pregnancy, is far more egalitarian and progressive.” So comparing pro-lifers to the Taliban is just the wrong look; after all, who could possibly be more egalitarian and progressive than the Taliban?
