I've never used a pressure cooker, but I've always thought that poking holes in meat was seldom a good thing (regardless of the cooking method). He made it look tasty (and visually appealing) with different color bell peppers, and my taste buds were anticipating liking the flavor combos.
But I'm thinking the meat would absorb the flavors without losing their juices while not poking holes in it, right? It sounds to me like great tasting gravy, but dry meat.
If anyone tries this, would you let me know how it turns out? I'm truly curious.
America's Test Kitchen says that poking holes = dry meat is a myth. But I am lifelong conditioned to not poking holes in meat, either to marinade or to flip on the grill.
Same here on the marinating or grilling. I can see ATK's theory carrying weight for things like probing for an instant read temperature (minimal liquid escaping). But I'm thinking when liquid finds a way out from multiple piercings like in this demo, you're more likely going to get good potential flavor from the gravy. And you may be fooled into thinking it tastes good because of the gravy, but the meat is still dry from not retaining the juice. It might be something worth researching again, though. Still learning here. :shrug:
America's Test Kitchen says that poking holes = dry meat is a myth. But I am lifelong conditioned to not poking holes in meat, either to marinade or to flip on the grill.
I've never used a pressure cooker, but I've always thought that poking holes in meat was seldom a good thing (regardless of the cooking method). He made it look tasty (and visually appealing) with different color bell peppers, and my taste buds were anticipating liking the flavor combos.
But I'm thinking the meat would absorb the flavors without losing their juices while not poking holes in it, right? It sounds to me like great tasting gravy, but dry meat.
If anyone tries this, would you let me know how it turns out? I'm truly curious.