Techno-skeptics’ objection growing louder
Taylor is a 21st-century digital dissenter. She’s one of the many technophiles unhappy about the way the tech revolution has played out. Political progressives once embraced the utopian promise of the Internet as a democratizing force, but they’ve been dismayed by the rise of the “surveillance state,” and the near-monopolization of digital platforms by huge corporations.
Last month, Taylor and more than 1,000 activists, scholars and techies gathered at the New School in New York City for a conference to talk about reinventing the Internet. They dream of a co-op model: people dealing directly with one another without having to go through a data-sucking corporate hub.
[clip]
Other critics are alarmed by the erosion of privacy. The Edward Snowden revelations incited widespread fear of government surveillance. That debate has been complicated by the terrorist attacks in Paris and San Bernardino, because national security officials say terrorists have exploited new types of encrypted social media.
Some dissenters think technology is driving economic inequality. There are grave concerns that robots are taking the jobs of humans. And the robot issue leads inevitably to the most apocalyptic fear: that machine intelligence could run away from its human inventors, leaving us enslaved — or worse — by the machines we created.
well the problem is that interconnected network .....
routers, switches, servers .....
all COST MONEY ...
unless they want to go back to the BBS dial up days, 'their' data is going across someones 'network'
with a BBS you direct dial into [what we would call a server today] node that can accept multiple connections ... the problem is, it still costs money
sure you can set up a cheap PC, but those phone lines are gonna cost you
yeah that BBS Could be 'private' as well only allowing 'trusted' individuals access ....