tenant refuses to pay last months rent

jasonandjen

New Member
we have a tenant that refused to pay last months rent after we gave them 45 days notice that we did not want to extend their lease. first he said he assumed they would be fine using his security deposit for last months rent. i told him thats not what it was for and that they had to pay or face legal proceedings. so they have not paid, also claiming they have no money now that they have to save up for their next place, since we are kicking them out. we have a court date this tuesday for failing to pay rent, and i was wondering if anyone has used the saint marys court system for evicting a tenant for failure to pay rent and what i should be expecting.
 

krb

New Member
Good luck to you. This county is HORRIBLE for the landlord (speaking SMC here). We've had situations where a tenant has owed SIX months rent and the judge kept giving more and more time. Ended up in an eviction and we are still out over six months rent.
 

bcp

In My Opinion
I owned a rental property in Virginia Beach years ago when I lived there.
I will NEVER go through that again. If one does, it is really worth paying a property manager to take care of things for you.
Tenents actually stole the copper pipes out of the crawl space and (I assume) sold the. Then they turned around and claimed that the house was unlivable because there was no running water. Naturally, they waited 2 years without water before complaining...
I had to pay to put the pipes back in to bring it up to code or face fines. Since we could not actually prove they took the pipes out, (like, WTF did they go??) they were not required to make any restitution.
Things may have changed over the years though.
 

Gilligan

#*! boat!
PREMO Member
I've 'won' every time I had to make a claim against a tenant for back rent and/or damages. The reason I always won was twofold and the same in every case:

1. I had reasonably good documentation of the claimed amount.

2. None of the defendants ever even showed to dispute the claims and were simply served later with the award notice.

It can be, and often is, far more complicated and less satisfactory an outcome than that..

Good luck.
 

Gilligan

#*! boat!
PREMO Member
You may have "won", but did you ever get your money?
I won too, but I never received payment, but that was in Calvert County.

Actually..yes I did. Probably more because the persons in question did not leave the general area and so I could continue to apply pressure for payment directly. Had they simply left the area..I'm pretty sure I would never have seen a penny of it.
 

VoteJP

J.P. Cusick
Excellent.

we have a tenant that refused to pay last months rent after we gave them 45 days notice that we did not want to extend their lease. first he said he assumed they would be fine using his security deposit for last months rent. i told him thats not what it was for and that they had to pay or face legal proceedings. so they have not paid, also claiming they have no money now that they have to save up for their next place, since we are kicking them out. we have a court date this tuesday for failing to pay rent, and i was wondering if anyone has used the saint marys court system for evicting a tenant for failure to pay rent and what i should be expecting.

Actually you did get paid for the last month as they gave you the security deposit.

So the only claim you have now is if the apartment is damaged or some claim against the security deposit.

If I were them then I would be happy to go to Court against your claim.

When I was in California then the Landlords there do NOT take any security deposit and they take the first-and-last months rent so that no one over in California pays their last month as it was already paid.

So your tenants might come from another State as Like California and they might have believed the security deposit was for the last month's rent.

Plus you are not saying that you have lost anything or any money as in fact you did get paid in full for that last month.

:shrug:
 

struggler44

A Salute to all on Watch
Actually you did get paid for the last month as they gave you the security deposit.

So the only claim you have now is if the apartment is damaged or some claim against the security deposit.

If I were them then I would be happy to go to Court against your claim.

When I was in California then the Landlords there do NOT take any security deposit and they take the first-and-last months rent so that no one over in California pays their last month as it was already paid.

So your tenants might come from another State as Like California and they might have believed the security deposit was for the last month's rent.

Plus you are not saying that you have lost anything or any money as in fact you did get paid in full for that last month.

:shrug:


You know as much about it as I do so STFU, Kreskin
 

bcp

In My Opinion
I know in the contracts (if you actually rent and are not supplied by the government) it clearly states first months rent.
They make sure to get the rent for the month before you live there for the month, you never pay after the fact.
The last months rent is usually stated that it will be taken as a security deposit, and the terms of getting it back are spelled out.
but regardless of that lets go back to the original thought here.
YOU PAY THE MONTH IN ADVANCE.
So lets say you move out on July 30. That means that you must have paid the July Rent by the end of June. So by law, and by contract, you would pay the rent for July, then at the end of July when you moved out you would have your deposit returned (less damage and in some peoples cases fumigation) after a set and agreed on period of time.
You cannot use the deposit to pay for the July rental then expect to be caught up when you just run out at the end of the month.
First off, if someone leaves in that manner, they are most likely pigs that destroyed the apartment and are trying to skip out on repairs and cleanings in excess of what could be considered normal for the time they were there.

That "last months rent" is held in an escrow account for the purpose of cleaning/repairs.
 

Merlin99

Visualize whirled peas
PREMO Member
Actually you did get paid for the last month as they gave you the security deposit.

So the only claim you have now is if the apartment is damaged or some claim against the security deposit.

If I were them then I would be happy to go to Court against your claim.

When I was in California then the Landlords there do NOT take any security deposit and they take the first-and-last months rent so that no one over in California pays their last month as it was already paid.

So your tenants might come from another State as Like California and they might have believed the security deposit was for the last month's rent.

Plus you are not saying that you have lost anything or any money as in fact you did get paid in full for that last month.

:shrug:
You are consistant, you know absolutely nothing in any field.
 

Namikazenaru

New Member
I've rented a few places over the past 5 years

As someone who has rented the past 5 years, (finally owning in a couple weeks :banana: ) it was common for me to see either the collection of first and last month's rent at the beginning of the lease or the use of the security deposit on the last month's rent. So there might have been confusion on the part of the renter as that was what they are used to. This doesn't mean they aren't responsible for the rent.

Though if there is no damage (besides normal wear and tear as that is stated as not coming out of the security deposit in the normal lease paperwork for the county), why not just avoid the court date and take that as the last month's rent.

To me it makes no sense to make two transfers of money (one the last month's rent to you and then you the security deposit back to them) if there is no difference.

Did the lease say 60 day notice to not renew lease? 45 days seems like an odd number and every lease I've signed in this county was a 60 day notice of termination of the lease either by the leasee or the landlord.

Also, last part of my thoughts on this and again trying not to make excuses for them, I assume they were renting a house well if their next place does first and last month's rent plus a security deposit that covers two months worth of rent (which I have had in the past), we could be talking easily $8,000 they had to put in for the new place.
 
Last edited:

Gilligan

#*! boat!
PREMO Member
You are consistant, you know absolutely nothing in any field.

That. Clueless beyond belief he is. I've been a landlord in MD, off and on, for about 20 years. I doubt JP has even owned the cup he drinks his coffee out of.
 

Roman

Active Member
You may have "won", but did you ever get your money?
I won too, but I never received payment, but that was in Calvert County.
We went through the same thing in Calvert! If the Tenant came to Court prepared with the Back Rent, the Court Vowed in his defence. It took us MONTHS to get him out of our OWN Property!
 

Chasey_Lane

Salt Life
If there are no damages to the property (and no utilities are owed), I'd use the security deposit as last month's rent. :shrug:
 

Gilligan

#*! boat!
PREMO Member
If there are no damages to the property (and no utilities are owed), I'd use the security deposit as last month's rent. :shrug:

As a practical matter, I do agree with you on that. While it might not be in accordance with the lease terms, if nothing was damaged.....:coffee:
 

Bustem' Down

Give Peas a Chance
As a practical matter, I do agree with you on that. While it might not be in accordance with the lease terms, if nothing was damaged.....:coffee:

How much was the security deposit? I've been in places where the deposit was both more and less than the rent amount. Usually more if you have pets because they always rolled that into it.
 

Gilligan

#*! boat!
PREMO Member
How much was the security deposit? I've been in places where the deposit was both more and less than the rent amount. Usually more if you have pets because they always rolled that into it.

Speaking from my own practices, I only asked for one month rent in advance as the security deposit amount. But I know that in recent years, two months is not that uncommon.
 

BadGirl

I am so very blessed
If there are no damages to the property (and no utilities are owed), I'd use the security deposit as last month's rent. :shrug:
But see, there is a downside to doing this.

As a renter, you could say, "the place is just like it was when I moved in, even better, in fact."

As a landlord, you could say, "the renters stole the hot water heater, had their 27 cats shiat on the hardwood floors, left a 3 month old meatloaf in the oven, and their three adopted children in the freezer in the garage."

Rent is supposed to be for rent. A security deposit is supposed to be for damages. If there are no damages to the property, then the deposit should be returned within 30 days WITH interest.

Most times, though, the security deposit will never cover the costs of the damages that some tenants cause. Damages over and above normal wear and tear, that is. A landlord should expect *some* level of minor damages....
 

Namikazenaru

New Member
But see, there is a downside to doing this.

As a renter, you could say, "the place is just like it was when I moved in, even better, in fact."

As a landlord, you could say, "the renters stole the hot water heater, had their 27 cats shiat on the hardwood floors, left a 3 month old meatloaf in the oven, and their three adopted children in the freezer in the garage."

Rent is supposed to be for rent. A security deposit is supposed to be for damages. If there are no damages to the property, then the deposit should be returned within 30 days WITH interest.

Most times, though, the security deposit will never cover the costs of the damages that some tenants cause. Damages over and above normal wear and tear, that is. A landlord should expect *some* level of minor damages....

Well the point is that the renters already said they thought that is what the security deposit was supposed to be for so if there is no damages fromt he normal wear and tear and they want it to go to the last months rent, why go through all the trouble of a court date. Just get in writing they accept the security dpeost is being used to cover the last motnhs rent, give them the interest and we saved everyone time and frustration.
 
Top