Until maybe 5 minutes ago I was all for it. Then I saw this:
Rosa DeLauro reps an extremely Democrat district in CT. She has been in that seat since....1991. Before many of her voters were even born.
I don't find this vid super cringe - it's like children cussing: inappropriate, but still funny.
Anyway, let's say she gets term limited out; who will replace her?
That's right, another far Left Democrat.
Not only that, but voters have complete control over term limits. They can vote out the incumbent any time they want. I mean, the real fact is these people get so entrenched that they win their elections come hell or high water, but even if there is a limit on how long they can serve it's not like voters in those districts/cities/states are going to go, "Y'know, I'm tired of Marxist crazy and being insulted. I'ma vote for a conservative this time."
As we've seen in so SO many elections, Democrats in particular - who have spent 4+ years doing nothing but bitch about Democrat policies - will not only vote for another Democrat, they will go even FURTHER Left. Look at that kook in Chicago, and all the kooks in NYC, and that kook ya'll Marylanders put in the Governor seat.
CA has done nothing but bitch about Gavin Newsom and yet when they had the opportunity to recall him....they voted to keep him.
AOC has been a disaster but she will hold that seat until she runs for Senator; then she'll hold that seat for as long as she wants it. Her re-elections weren't even close, which is why I don't want to hear her whiny baby constituents bitching about her.
I mean, it doesn't really matter anyway because slimy politicians aren't going to enact legislation that removes them from power. "I vote to fire myself after a certain number of years!"
So that's what I'm thinking about this morning....
The other thing I'm thinking about is how they were trying to get NE to change to winner take all electorals. IMO that is going the wrong way. What should happen is ALL states award electorals based on district. That's the only way the people who live in a state dominated by major metro areas can be represented and have their vote count. If you live in NY or MD or CA your state is red-red-red....except for a blob of blue where all the tards live. And yet that blob disenfranchises you to the point you might as well not even vote.
Democrats say they want all votes to count, but what they mean by that is they want all votes *for them* to count. Everyone else can piss off.
Rosa DeLauro reps an extremely Democrat district in CT. She has been in that seat since....1991. Before many of her voters were even born.
I don't find this vid super cringe - it's like children cussing: inappropriate, but still funny.
Anyway, let's say she gets term limited out; who will replace her?
That's right, another far Left Democrat.
Not only that, but voters have complete control over term limits. They can vote out the incumbent any time they want. I mean, the real fact is these people get so entrenched that they win their elections come hell or high water, but even if there is a limit on how long they can serve it's not like voters in those districts/cities/states are going to go, "Y'know, I'm tired of Marxist crazy and being insulted. I'ma vote for a conservative this time."
As we've seen in so SO many elections, Democrats in particular - who have spent 4+ years doing nothing but bitch about Democrat policies - will not only vote for another Democrat, they will go even FURTHER Left. Look at that kook in Chicago, and all the kooks in NYC, and that kook ya'll Marylanders put in the Governor seat.
CA has done nothing but bitch about Gavin Newsom and yet when they had the opportunity to recall him....they voted to keep him.
AOC has been a disaster but she will hold that seat until she runs for Senator; then she'll hold that seat for as long as she wants it. Her re-elections weren't even close, which is why I don't want to hear her whiny baby constituents bitching about her.
I mean, it doesn't really matter anyway because slimy politicians aren't going to enact legislation that removes them from power. "I vote to fire myself after a certain number of years!"
So that's what I'm thinking about this morning....
The other thing I'm thinking about is how they were trying to get NE to change to winner take all electorals. IMO that is going the wrong way. What should happen is ALL states award electorals based on district. That's the only way the people who live in a state dominated by major metro areas can be represented and have their vote count. If you live in NY or MD or CA your state is red-red-red....except for a blob of blue where all the tards live. And yet that blob disenfranchises you to the point you might as well not even vote.
Democrats say they want all votes to count, but what they mean by that is they want all votes *for them* to count. Everyone else can piss off.