Their anti-vitamin D propaganda is so lazy that they don’t even bother switching up the thumbnails in their hit pieces anymore.
Let’s take the first propaganda piece, “Vitamin D won’t protect you from Covid or respiratory infections, studies say.”
The first study cited in the article to debunk vitamin D’s utility for immune system health involved giving patients a vitamin D supplement and then swabbing them for COVID-19 infections over the course of six months. It had exactly nothing to say about the severity of COVID-19 in positive cases or whether the test subjects were even symptomatic.
[clip]
In the above article, as in virtually all others, CNN eventually meanders to the punchline: “We can be completely sure that vaccination is way more effective than vitamin D which probably does not prevent COVID-19 at all.”
One would be hard-pressed to find a single corporate media article covering vitamin D that does not promote COVID-19 vaxxes at some point, even though the two topics are ostensibly unrelated.
Not a single supplement, arguably, has a more extensive track record of study documenting its medicinal properties than vitamin D. Any uncorrupted immunologist worth his salt will tell you the truth based on decades of research (see here, here, and here).
But the New York Times won’t let that stop its propaganda:
Nonsense. There are dozens, if not hundreds or thousands, of supplements that boost immunity — zinc, various mushroom extracts, vitamin C, and elderberry, just to name a few. Vitamin D just happens to trump them all in terms of clinical research. It’s the most reliably effective means to naturally augment immunity, which is why it must be demonized.
Let’s take the first propaganda piece, “Vitamin D won’t protect you from Covid or respiratory infections, studies say.”
The first study cited in the article to debunk vitamin D’s utility for immune system health involved giving patients a vitamin D supplement and then swabbing them for COVID-19 infections over the course of six months. It had exactly nothing to say about the severity of COVID-19 in positive cases or whether the test subjects were even symptomatic.
[clip]
In the above article, as in virtually all others, CNN eventually meanders to the punchline: “We can be completely sure that vaccination is way more effective than vitamin D which probably does not prevent COVID-19 at all.”
One would be hard-pressed to find a single corporate media article covering vitamin D that does not promote COVID-19 vaxxes at some point, even though the two topics are ostensibly unrelated.
Not a single supplement, arguably, has a more extensive track record of study documenting its medicinal properties than vitamin D. Any uncorrupted immunologist worth his salt will tell you the truth based on decades of research (see here, here, and here).
But the New York Times won’t let that stop its propaganda:
Nonsense. There are dozens, if not hundreds or thousands, of supplements that boost immunity — zinc, various mushroom extracts, vitamin C, and elderberry, just to name a few. Vitamin D just happens to trump them all in terms of clinical research. It’s the most reliably effective means to naturally augment immunity, which is why it must be demonized.
