Midnightrider
Well-Known Member
Show me the ones that were protesting with the Nazis, but were not white supremacists. It should be easy
The "Fine People" Hoax Funnel
- Thread starter Yooper
- Start date
-
- Tags
- persuasion psychology
Midnightrider
Well-Known Member
The protesters that had the permit were white supremacists/Nazis. I don’t have to prove who they were. Their permit said it all
This_person
Well-Known Member
You realize you're basing your arguments on assumptions right? YOU are assuming that there was no one else but Nazis there, everyone else is assuming that there were people there who were NOT Nazis. Unless we have a roster of everyone who was there and their totality of internal beliefs documented, no one can prove either way (that includes you can't prove they were all Nazis and everyone else can't prove they weren't, just for your clarity).
So, you are asking to prove a negative either way. It's just that one is statistically likely (there were other-than-Nazis there), and one is statistically unlikely (your position).
I hope that helps with your understanding that your argument is both futile and unlikely to be accurate.
NPC
Active Member
Midnightrider
Well-Known Member
Now that’s funny coming from a guy who is fixated on things he claims to be ignoring.
This_person
Well-Known Member
The REALLY funny thing is that you can't answer MY question about knowing your argument is just assumption, and your side is the lower-likelihood side.
Ah. No.
Midnightrider
Well-Known Member
Show me. The Nazis had the permit. Show me the ‘fine people’ who went to protest with them.
This_person
Well-Known Member
Bob, Sue, Jane, and Stan are all fine people who didn't sign the permit but were there.
Now, you can be done with it - you've been told who was there that were fine people and not Nazis but marching with them.
Midnightrider
Well-Known Member
As long as you are pulling things out of your ass, you might want to get your head out of there.
This_person
Well-Known Member
Prove me wrong.
It makes as much sense as your request to prove an assumption on your part.
Yooper
Up. Identified. Lase. Fire. On the way.
Adams, in his podcast yesterday, provided the results of his A-B test (i.e., whether YouTube would demonitize his video for simply mentioning the Fine People Hoax (FPH)). And guess what, YouTube did. Bottom line, whether as a result of a less-than-mature algorithm or overt political bias this a real problem.
Here's the link:
He speaks about the A-B test for the FPH starting at about 3:30 (goes to about 8:45).
--- End of line (MCP)
NPC
Active Member
Do You have any proof otherwise, are you friends with Gurps ?
You are an angry hateful individual, you need to have your programming adjusted.
It’s not a ‘mommy’ reference. It’s a reference to the fact that gurps actually lives with his mother.
What is wrong with living with family members - mother's, father's, brother's cousin's ..... etc
You Really are a hateful mean person.
What is it with your pathological obsession with the living arrangements of a forum member, that you continually engage in Ad Hominem Attacks attempting to down play someone else's position, by virtue of where they live.. You should realize any personal attacks invalidate any moral high ground you THINK you may hold, in a discussion, showing that all you have is distain and hatred, and have no apparent desire for meaningful conversation, but then your comments and the responses you garner show you here just to be as obtuse as possible offering no real substance.
He's related to ChrisO?
Yooper
Up. Identified. Lase. Fire. On the way.
Tells me that you didn't actually read Scott Adams article that is at the root of this thread. He quotes the sources that report the presence of non-nazi protestors at the festivities in Charlottesville that day.
Some of the counter-protestors were violent antifa thugs, some where episcopal and lutheran priests. Same diversity along the axis of 'violence', just different color of clothing and different ideology.