The Loneliness Epidemic

GURPS

INGSOC
PREMO Member
The Feds Want To Control Your Town And Friends



U.S. Surgeon General Vivek Murthy recently released an advisory titled “Our Epidemic of Loneliness and Isolation.” It warns that social isolation is a major public health problem. The 81-page document presents six government-directed “pillars” of action to address the health hazards of social isolation.

On the surface, these six directives may look innocuous, but they present a clear and present danger to the autonomy of our private lives and relationships. The project is potentially so massive in scope that it’s not an overstatement to say it threatens to regulate our freedom of association in ways we never could have imagined.

Let’s look in greater depth at those pillars and the risks they pose.

‘Building a Social Infrastructure’

The first stated goal is to “strengthen social infrastructure in local communities.” It defines “social infrastructure” as the regular events and institutions that make up community life, and says the federal government should both fund local organizations and direct how they’re structured, including their locations. This can only mean that all local communities must answer to the federal bureaucracy in the quest to strengthen social connections among people.

Social infrastructure, the report says, includes physical parts of a community, such as housing, libraries, parks and recreation spaces, transport systems, and so forth. The report expresses concern that some people have better access to such locations than other people, and recommends federal interventions.

Those are likely to be used to promote densified housing along the lines of the “15-minute city” (more accurately termed 15-minute ghettoes), as well as the eventual dismantling of single-family housing. The goal of replacing private vehicles with public transportation fits easily into this scheme too.

I don’t presume that this plan will, by itself, drive wholesale changes in our physical infrastructure. But it would certainly provide authority and justification for changes supported by radical environmentalists, all of which diminish our freedoms.

The advisory warns that participation is mandatory if the plan is to work: “It will take all of us — individuals, families, schools, and workplaces, health care and public health systems, technology companies, governments, faith organizations, and communities — working together…”

The report’s proposed infrastructure to solve the problem of social isolation seems designed to lock everybody into compliance with and dependence upon federal mandates. Local control is then lost.

We end up with a massive federal infrastructure that can monitor the levels of social connection and disconnection in every nook and cranny of society. As described in the report, this would mean every institution, every governmental department, every volunteer association, every locality, every church, every faith community, every organization, every club, every service club, every sports league, and so on, would likely be assessed and “strengthened” to promote social connection.
 
Last edited:

SamSpade

Well-Known Member
For whatever cause - it would seem that most social organizations are deteriorating rapidly. Organizations for children - ditto. Churches - same. These sorts of things were the backbone of our culture.

Then of course, there's family - and how it is getting hammered.

We have whole cities full of people who don't know their neighbors even after living near them for decades. Families that don't see each other and churches and fraternal organizations losing members.

I wouldn't say that government has been too kind in promoting or in any way encouraging them all.
 

Kyle

Beloved Misanthrope
PREMO Member
We have whole cities full of people who don't know their neighbors even after living near them for decades. Families that don't see each other and churches and fraternal organizations losing members.
As someone that fits that profile, in my defense... People, in general, have become bigger @$$holes over the last forty years so a little distance or separation can be a good thing too.
 

vraiblonde

Board Mommy
PREMO Member
Patron
I know all my neighbors and we chitty chat frequently, but I've always had good neighbors and a friendly relationship with them no matter where I've lived. I'm the most social antisocial you ever knew. :jet: and I don't need government to set up play dates for me.

But I want to point something out:

Democrats: "Erm, people are lonely and isolated and We Must Do Something ™ !"

Also Democrats: "We must lock people in their homes and shut down all gathering places so no one catches the flu!"

:tap:
 

Kyle

Beloved Misanthrope
PREMO Member
But I want to point something out:

Democrats: "Erm, people are lonely and isolated and We Must Do Something ™ !"

Also Democrats: "We must lock people in their homes and shut down all gathering places so no one catches the flu!"

:tap:
With so many similarly opposing positions, you'd think they'd all have whiplash by now.
 

Hijinx

Well-Known Member
I get along good with all my neighbors except the goofball that lives behind me with the Quarters in his ear lobes, and his pierced nose.
 

my-thyme

..if momma ain't happy...
Patron
Also Democrats: "We must lock people in their homes and shut down all gathering places so no one catches the flu!"

:tap:
And when all the family stopped going to her house so they didn't "make her sick", we kept going to my 98 yr old aunt's house and asked her if we should stop coming over.

She said she'd rather die of the flu than loneliness.

And most of the family have not picked back up going over. Guess they got out of the habit.
 

gemma_rae

Well-Known Member
yaknow........there's a massive center in Huntingtown, that started out as a humble church, run by a Capitol Hill lobbyist/rock star which now probably brings in more money than the tri-County revenue, (tax free of course). They used to suggest new members to join small groups to grow into the "environment."

So, lets see here.....
Church of the Chesapeake?
 

Gilligan

#*! boat!
PREMO Member
I've always been one who liked to know my neighbors and get to know a lot of folks in my little community. Was that way growing up on a farm in farm country 50 years ago too.

But now my hood is being taken over by come-downers with lots of money and no social graces. It's changing...a lot.
 

DaSDGuy

Well-Known Member
The Feds Want To Control Your Town And Friends



U.S. Surgeon General Vivek Murthy recently released an advisory titled “Our Epidemic of Loneliness and Isolation.” It warns that social isolation is a major public health problem. The 81-page document presents six government-directed “pillars” of action to address the health hazards of social isolation.

On the surface, these six directives may look innocuous, but they present a clear and present danger to the autonomy of our private lives and relationships. The project is potentially so massive in scope that it’s not an overstatement to say it threatens to regulate our freedom of association in ways we never could have imagined.

Let’s look in greater depth at those pillars and the risks they pose.

‘Building a Social Infrastructure’

The first stated goal is to “strengthen social infrastructure in local communities.” It defines “social infrastructure” as the regular events and institutions that make up community life, and says the federal government should both fund local organizations and direct how they’re structured, including their locations. This can only mean that all local communities must answer to the federal bureaucracy in the quest to strengthen social connections among people.

Social infrastructure, the report says, includes physical parts of a community, such as housing, libraries, parks and recreation spaces, transport systems, and so forth. The report expresses concern that some people have better access to such locations than other people, and recommends federal interventions.

Those are likely to be used to promote densified housing along the lines of the “15-minute city” (more accurately termed 15-minute ghettoes), as well as the eventual dismantling of single-family housing. The goal of replacing private vehicles with public transportation fits easily into this scheme too.

I don’t presume that this plan will, by itself, drive wholesale changes in our physical infrastructure. But it would certainly provide authority and justification for changes supported by radical environmentalists, all of which diminish our freedoms.

The advisory warns that participation is mandatory if the plan is to work: “It will take all of us — individuals, families, schools, and workplaces, health care and public health systems, technology companies, governments, faith organizations, and communities — working together…”

The report’s proposed infrastructure to solve the problem of social isolation seems designed to lock everybody into compliance with and dependence upon federal mandates. Local control is then lost.

We end up with a massive federal infrastructure that can monitor the levels of social connection and disconnection in every nook and cranny of society. As described in the report, this would mean every institution, every governmental department, every volunteer association, every locality, every church, every faith community, every organization, every club, every service club, every sports league, and so on, would likely be assessed and “strengthened” to promote social connection.
I like being alone most of the time. My SO understands and lets me be me. Evidently I am scaring the crap out of the Fed Government if they are starting this program to stop me. They should start this by REQUIRING Brandon to stay out of his basement and debate the other democratic candidates for the 2024 election. He can join the crowd first, as an example. Then we can get all Martha's Vineyard houses torn down first and build a bunch of 8a apartments there.
 
Top