The New New York Times.....

[GregV814]

NY Times hammered for article referring to biological women as ‘non-transgender women’​

okayyyyyyyy..

 

[glhs837]

NY Times hammered for article referring to biological women as ‘non-transgender women’​

okayyyyyyyy..

 

[vraiblonde]

Formerly known as "women".

 

[Merlin99]

NY Times hammered for article referring to biological women as ‘non-transgender women’​

okayyyyyyyy..

I'm not sure RR can we get a ruling here, is this a double negative or a double positive?

 

[GregV814]

This is new territory for Roberts Rules/// Maybe the Jeopardy writers/judges can poke their heads in and make a call...

 

[Kyle]

I'm not sure RR can we get a ruling here, is this a double negative or a double positive?

Tardish-Trope would be more fitting.

 

[Czar]

Grandma would have smacked that NYT editor with her wooden spoon.

 

[RoseRed]

I'm not sure RR can we get a ruling here, is this a double negative or a double positive?

Huh?

 

[Merlin99]

Huh?

You've always been the one to catch the to/too/two, their/there/they're errors, I figured that makes you the resident english expert.

 

[RoseRed]

You've always been the one to catch the to/too/two, their/there/they're errors, I figured that makes you the resident english expert.

I didn't read the article.