Forestool posted the major Democrat talking points against Palin.
1. Palin's against abortion, so much so she delivered a child with Down's syndrome. Conservatives and liberals disagree on the subject. This would be brought up as an issue no matter who the candidate is.
2. Palin is willing to send our sons and daughters to Iraq die for Big Oil. The argument started out well, but lost credibility with the "BIG OIL" comment. Palin has taken on "BIG OIL" in Alaska and won. If Forestool still believes the United States went to Iraq for "BIG OIL", he's delusional. Again, the argument would be brought up as an issue no matter who the candidate is.
3. Apparently a flip-flopper regarding the "Bridge to Nowhere". I believe she acted as a politician in this case. $223 million to connect a town (whose Mayor criticized Palin) to another town of 12 folks. The other complaint came from the State House Speaker, a Republican, who supported Palin's opponent. The earmark was withdrawn but Alaska was still granted an equivalent amount of transportation money to be used at its own discretion. She did so at her discretion and stopped programs that had serious cost overruns. Again, all four candidates have flip-flopped on a position in this campaign. In this case, I believe using the taxpayers money wisely is a good action.
4. Can I imagine her staring down Putin? I don't see why not. Is this a sexist remark? She took on a corrupt establishment during her governor's campaign and won. She has negotiated with Canada and Russia over various issues related to Alaska. Is Obama meeting without preconditions a hostile leader any different than a woman executive meeting with a hostile leader?
5. If anything looked like affirmative action this is it. Name a minority person you wouldn't have said this about. I'd like to point out that Republicans have many accomplished minority members in their ranks. I believe even Forestool can think of a few. Imagine his outrage and attacks if Condolezza Rice were selected as the VP candidate.
6. Another Clinton "sniper" hunt moment? Traveling abroad doesn't give one foreign 'policy' experience. I'm well traveled and wouldn't consider myself a foreign policy expert. The number of stamps in a passport doesn't qualify as policy experience. Neither does being the spouse of an executive. Living in a foreign country as a young child doesn't give one foreign policy experience. Negotiating treaties or trade agreements does, and let the candidates explain what they have done along those lines.
7. Cynicism and condescension. That's what a 'so-called' feminist calls the selection of Palin. Palin doesn't fit their mold of a 'feminist'. A successful executive in higher office, with a traditional family outrages these women. Liberal definitions of a woman's role and conservative definitions seem surprisingly out of whack here. Palin is accomplished but doesn't hold the radical left wing views of Dowd and company. And these so-called feminists are angry she's successful? We all don't travel the same road to success. Sounds more like sour grapes to me that someone who doesn't hold to their beliefs could actually be successful.
These arguments against Palin would have been brought up against any conservative woman in that position. I'm actually surprised you didn't throw in the mix the idea that she should stay home and take care of Trig.
Debate issues, not character assassination.