transporter
Well-Known Member
For those who haven't read the report...
For those who ONLY get their "news" from Fox, brietbart or comrade GURPS day long posts from dailywire, townhall or other subversive publications...
For the likes of spitbubble, so she can actually understand what "context" means....
For This_person who clearly can't read English...
For the rest of the ignorati types who are the truly stupid...
Full Transcript of Mueller’s Statement on Russia Investigation
Now for those on here who only read the two underlined lines and came to a conclusion that was completely out of context (Spitbubble, This_person and the rest of you morons)...
And for those who can't understand the English of the bolded text:
Mueller's team was never going to indict Trump.
For those who are actually paying attention, the bolded portion completely contradicts what AG Barr said when he spoke upon the release of his misleading summary of the Mueller report. Naturally none of the moron crew will understand this either.
For those who ONLY get their "news" from Fox, brietbart or comrade GURPS day long posts from dailywire, townhall or other subversive publications...
For the likes of spitbubble, so she can actually understand what "context" means....
For This_person who clearly can't read English...
For the rest of the ignorati types who are the truly stupid...
Full Transcript of Mueller’s Statement on Russia Investigation
The order appointing me special counsel authorized us to investigate actions that could obstruct the investigation. We conducted that investigation, and we kept the office of the acting attorney general apprised of the progress of our work. And as set forth in the report, after that investigation, if we had had confidence that the president clearly did not commit a crime, we would have said so. We did not, however, make a determination as to whether the president did commit a crime.
First, the opinion explicitly permits the investigation of a sitting president, because it is important to preserve evidence while memories are fresh and documents available. Among other things, that evidence could be used if there were co-conspirators who could be charged now.
And second, the opinion says that the Constitution requires a process other than the criminal justice system to formally accuse a sitting president of wrongdoing. And beyond department policy, we were guided by principles of fairness. It would be unfair to potentially — it would be unfair to potentially accuse somebody of a crime when there can be no court resolution of the actual charge.
So that was Justice Department policy. Those were the principles under which we operated. And from them, we concluded that we would not reach a determination one way or the other about whether the president committed a crime. That is the office’s final position, and we will not comment on any other conclusions or hypotheticals about the president. We conducted an independent criminal investigation and reported the results to the attorney general, as required by department regulations.
Now for those on here who only read the two underlined lines and came to a conclusion that was completely out of context (Spitbubble, This_person and the rest of you morons)...
And for those who can't understand the English of the bolded text:
Mueller's team was never going to indict Trump.
For those who are actually paying attention, the bolded portion completely contradicts what AG Barr said when he spoke upon the release of his misleading summary of the Mueller report. Naturally none of the moron crew will understand this either.