The transcript--this is for the truly stupid

transporter

Well-Known Member
For those who haven't read the report...

For those who ONLY get their "news" from Fox, brietbart or comrade GURPS day long posts from dailywire, townhall or other subversive publications...

For the likes of spitbubble, so she can actually understand what "context" means....

For This_person who clearly can't read English...

For the rest of the ignorati types who are the truly stupid...

Full Transcript of Mueller’s Statement on Russia Investigation

The order appointing me special counsel authorized us to investigate actions that could obstruct the investigation. We conducted that investigation, and we kept the office of the acting attorney general apprised of the progress of our work. And as set forth in the report, after that investigation, if we had had confidence that the president clearly did not commit a crime, we would have said so. We did not, however, make a determination as to whether the president did commit a crime.

First, the opinion explicitly permits the investigation of a sitting president, because it is important to preserve evidence while memories are fresh and documents available. Among other things, that evidence could be used if there were co-conspirators who could be charged now.

And second, the opinion says that the Constitution requires a process other than the criminal justice system to formally accuse a sitting president of wrongdoing. And beyond department policy, we were guided by principles of fairness. It would be unfair to potentially — it would be unfair to potentially accuse somebody of a crime when there can be no court resolution of the actual charge.

So that was Justice Department policy. Those were the principles under which we operated. And from them, we concluded that we would not reach a determination one way or the other about whether the president committed a crime. That is the office’s final position, and we will not comment on any other conclusions or hypotheticals about the president. We conducted an independent criminal investigation and reported the results to the attorney general, as required by department regulations.

Now for those on here who only read the two underlined lines and came to a conclusion that was completely out of context (Spitbubble, This_person and the rest of you morons)...

And for those who can't understand the English of the bolded text:

Mueller's team was never going to indict Trump.

For those who are actually paying attention, the bolded portion completely contradicts what AG Barr said when he spoke upon the release of his misleading summary of the Mueller report. Naturally none of the moron crew will understand this either.
 

This_person

Well-Known Member
For those who haven't read the report...

For those who ONLY get their "news" from Fox, brietbart or comrade GURPS day long posts from dailywire, townhall or other subversive publications...

For the likes of spitbubble, so she can actually understand what "context" means....

For This_person who clearly can't read English...

For the rest of the ignorati types who are the truly stupid...

Full Transcript of Mueller’s Statement on Russia Investigation



Now for those on here who only read the two underlined lines and came to a conclusion that was completely out of context (Spitbubble, This_person and the rest of you morons)...

And for those who can't understand the English of the bolded text:

Mueller's team was never going to indict Trump.

For those who are actually paying attention, the bolded portion completely contradicts what AG Barr said when he spoke upon the release of his misleading summary of the Mueller report. Naturally none of the moron crew will understand this either.
Why investigate, then say you know you can indict for post presidency prosecution, if you won't do that?
 

Yooper

Up. Identified. Lase. Fire. On the way.
Let's go with this in response. From John Hinderaker at Power Line:

Here is my question. (I know it has been asked before, but it can’t be repeated too often.) If Mueller’s charge was to investigate “Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election…[including] investigating any links or coordination between the Russian government and individuals associated with the Trump campaign,” why didn’t he look into the possibility that the false information fed by alleged Russian insiders to an agent of the Clinton campaign was a disinformation effort by the Russian government, meant to interfere in the 2016 presidential election–an effort in which the Clinton campaign colluded?

There is strong circumstantial evidence that the Steele dossier was exactly that, while there never was any evidence at all that the Trump campaign colluded in any way with Russians. So why was Mueller’s investigation confined to the wrong campaign?

The question answers itself. Mueller’s mission was the same as Christopher Steele’s mission, and Glenn Simpson’s, and Perkins Coie’s, and Hillary Clinton’s: to destroy Donald Trump, by hook or by crook. That is the only explanation for Mueller’s seeming myopia about his own failure to look for collusion where, in all likelihood, it actually existed.


More here:

--- End of line (MCP)
 
Last edited:

BOP

Well-Known Member
Mueller basically said, "We weren't able to prove Bigfoot exists. ‘If we had confidence that Bigfoot did not exist, we would have said so."

137573
 

littlelady

God bless the USA
Let's go with this in response. From John Hinderaker at Power Line:

Here is my question. (I know it has been asked before, but it can’t be repeated too often.) If Mueller’s charge was to investigate “Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election…[including] investigating any links or coordination between the Russian government and individuals associated with the Trump campaign,” why didn’t he look into the possibility that the false information fed by alleged Russian insiders to an agent of the Clinton campaign was a disinformation effort by the Russian government, meant to interfere in the 2016 presidential election–an effort in which the Clinton campaign colluded?

There is strong circumstantial evidence that the Steele dossier was exactly that, while there never was any evidence at all that the Trump campaign colluded in any way with Russians. So why was Mueller’s investigation confined to the wrong campaign?

The question answers itself. Mueller’s mission was the same as Christopher Steele’s mission, and Glenn Simpson’s, and Perkins Coie’s, and Hillary Clinton’s: to destroy Donald Trump, by hook or by crook. That is the only explanation for Mueller’s seeming myopia about his own failure to look for collusion where, in all likelihood, it actually existed.


More here:

--- End of line (MCP)

I am tired of shaking my head. Thank goodness I don’t get headaches. Didn’t know where to put this, so will put it here. Stacey Abrams to attend Bildeberg annual conference. Enough said. God bless America.

 
Last edited:
  • Wow
Reactions: BOP

littlelady

God bless the USA
Let's go with this in response. From John Hinderaker at Power Line:

Here is my question. (I know it has been asked before, but it can’t be repeated too often.) If Mueller’s charge was to investigate “Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election…[including] investigating any links or coordination between the Russian government and individuals associated with the Trump campaign,” why didn’t he look into the possibility that the false information fed by alleged Russian insiders to an agent of the Clinton campaign was a disinformation effort by the Russian government, meant to interfere in the 2016 presidential election–an effort in which the Clinton campaign colluded?

There is strong circumstantial evidence that the Steele dossier was exactly that, while there never was any evidence at all that the Trump campaign colluded in any way with Russians. So why was Mueller’s investigation confined to the wrong campaign?

The question answers itself. Mueller’s mission was the same as Christopher Steele’s mission, and Glenn Simpson’s, and Perkins Coie’s, and Hillary Clinton’s: to destroy Donald Trump, by hook or by crook. That is the only explanation for Mueller’s seeming myopia about his own failure to look for collusion where, in all likelihood, it actually existed.


More here:

--- End of line (MCP)

It is a bunch of gobbledygook because they have nothin’. What is scary is that they are not going to stop the nonsense, and lack of doing their job that WE pay for. And, they are running scared because they know they are part of the coup. That is why Mueller, abruptly, left, today.
 

littlelady

God bless the USA
Hey, TCROW. Why not post your thoughts, instead of an emogi? Coward.

Oh, so it seems TCROW is at a loss on his thoughts. This is why I get vigilante among the people that I may encounter. I live in Montgomery Cty, now, after all. Yikes. I have another story. We contacted the county 6 months ago that their mandated ditch was messed up in our yard. We were told we were 3500 on the list. They finally showed up today. And promptly, cut our Verizon connection. They said they called them to fix cuz it wasn’t buried deep enough, and Verizon would come to fix, immediately. Well, that didn’t happen. So, we called Verizon, and they said they never got the notification. Whatever. Such a bunch of crap all the time; no matter what the level of gov, or biz that want our money. We shall see what happens today. Consumer beware. They are supposed to be here between 12 and 2. The only reason I have been able to post is cuz we have WiFi on our phones. Happy Thursday, y’all! :)
 
Top